• Comment (3)

Thomas Frank: Obama Will Not Stand Up for His Party's Politics

The author of Pity the Billionaire discusses Rick Santorum as class warrior, the appeal of Occupy Wall Street, and the Republican Party's road to the right

March 30, 2012 RSS Feed Print

After Barack Obama and the Democrats won the White House and Congress in 2008, many commentators pronounced conservatism dead and argued that the Republicans would have to steer to the middle. Instead the GOP embraced more ideologically pure free-market beliefs and drubbed the Democrats in 2010. In his new book, Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right, historian and Harper's magazine columnist Thomas Frank, whose 2004 What's the Matter With Kansas? made him a liberal icon, examines that turnaround. He recently chatted with U.S. News about how Democrats let the GOP steal their moment and what they can do to revive themselves. Excerpts:

Are you a class warrior?

What's really curious is you often hear a guy like Rick Santorum, who I'm pretty sure has denounced class war—

I think he's denounced the idea of classes.

He denounced the whole idea of classes but then he plays on it really fortissimo, talking about his blue-collar ancestors, and how they worked so hard, and his outreach to working people, his contempt for Obama as a snob. That's a class term. These people want to have it both ways.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Rick Santorum.]

Why did the left let conservatives get away with this?

The main reason is that there isn't much of a left in America. Organized labor would be the traditional bearer of the New Deal economic vision, and they really have been beaten. The mainstream Democrats—their heart was never in it. They might do things like the stimulus package [and] healthcare reform. But they have a lot of trouble talking about why they're doing them. They could not confront the other side on the ideology of it.

[Read more author Q&As in U.S. News Weekly, now available on iPad.]

So what is the ideological answer?

You remember in World War II—and I still to this day don't understand why the Obama people didn't use this imagery—they used to call it the Four Freedoms. One of them was freedom from want. You had "town hall summer," 2009; all those angry people showed up at the town hall meetings to berate their member of Congress about the healthcare legislation. The constituents always tended to be angry about the same thing: freedom, tyranny, isn't this taking us down the road to serfdom. And the response of the Democrats on the hot seat was always: "This is what the experts tell us to do." That's your answer? They want to have a debate over first principles, the Tea Party types—and they had every right to a debate like that. Those were good questions. I couldn't believe that the Democrats never had an answer. They could not talk about how universal healthcare increases freedom.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Tea Party.]

And it's a poor response to charges of elitism.

The term for that is walking into the buzz saw. This is what the Democrats do again and again. And the really creepy thing is that there's a lot of accuracy about that critique, because the Democrats are before our eyes becoming the party of professionals. Now they might be lucky this fall because Mitt Romney has shown zero ability to bust this critique on anybody.

Have Democrats learned their lessons?

Obama's rhetoric has changed. There's been this very recent shift toward populism. But it's been a very strictly superficial shift. It's strictly in terms of rhetoric. The way these people think, all battles are battles over the center. So they look at a critique like mine and say, "Well, this guy is saying that in order to deal with this challenge on our right that we should move to our left, and anybody can see that that doesn't make any sense."

Is this pure free-market conservatism a viable long-term strategy for the GOP?

I don't think that they need to go much longer. The point is to prevent something like the New Deal from ever happening again. They've already won, because they did prevent it. In a sort of perverse sense they should thank Barack Obama—he's the one who really pulled it off.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican party.]

What do you make of the "99 percent" and Occupy movements?

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
Democratic Party,
Occupy Wall Street,
Obama administration,
Republican Party,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

furjug of WA

Yeah few Democrats stood up ADMITTING voting for bumacare for Nov. 1, 2010 elections. Those Demo's passed it brushing off BAD POLLS.

Not EVERYONE THOUGHT we needed it. Took a lot of PORK & bought votes to pass bumacare.

Maybe you can answer ? This great thing called bumacare, why 4 + year wait for all of it. Surely Dem's would be a shoe in at election time WITH THAT GREAT WORK OF ART. JUST LIKE HAPPENED NOV. 1, 2010.

Bill Hedges of MO 5:29PM April 01, 2012

Sadly, I must agree that dems are unwilling to say why they support the things we all agree are good things, even if we disagree as to how to achieve them.

Dems seem to be talking to a hypothetical "center" that doesn't understand america and has not lived through the last 40 years.

furjug of WA 10:48AM March 31, 2012

You are so right. You have identified all the sweet spots of the democratic party and what is lacking in their message to the American voter. They should take your advice and get to work NOW!

Mando of TX 7:01AM March 31, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

advertisement