Some scientists are now theorizing that a "once-in-many-lifetimes," as Texas State University physicist Donald Olson put it, lunar-Earth alignment may have caused the Titanic to sink a century ago. According to Olson’s team of forensic astronomers, the so-called “supermoon” would have raised ocean tides so much as to cause the type of large iceberg that sunk the Titanic to drift into the ship's path, far south of the Newfoundland and Labrador coasts where such an iceberg would normally have been stuck in the shallow waters. Usually this type of iceberg could not have floated south into the shipping lanes traveled by the Titanic without melting a bit, but a particularly high tide caused by the "supermoon" pulled it away from a Greenland glacier, so the theory goes. It would have taken three months for such an iceberg to travel from Greenland to the waters the Titanic traveled, according to Olsen’s research. He believes the phenomenon that brought the moon closest to Earth as it had been in 1,400 years occurred Jan. 4, 1912; the Titanic sank April 15 of that same year. This theory also could explain why the experienced Titanic captain Edward Smith seemed to brush off warnings of icebergs in the waters: He could not have expected an iceberg so large to have drifted so far south.
What do you think? Did the moon sink the Titanic? Take the poll and comment below.
This poll is now closed, but the debate continues in the comments section.
Previously: Should Newt Gingrich Drop Out of the 2012 Race?