• Comment (4)

Should the Democratic Party Include Gay Marriage in Its 2012 Platform?

Nancy Pelosi supports including same-sex marriage in the platform of the Democratic Party

February 15, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi would get behind a Democratic Party platform that included language supporting gay marriage, according to her spokesperson Drew Hammill. Her support comes in response to campaign launched by gay marriage organization Freedom to Marry called "Democrats Say I Do" which calls for "the national Democratic Party to include a plank supporting gay and lesbian couples' freedom to marry in the party's 2012 platform."

"Leader Pelosi supports this language," Hammill told told Metro Weekly, Washington, D.C. gay news magazine. Freedom to Marry president Eric Wolson said his organization is "proud to have Leader Pelosi joining our call to put the Democratic Party squarely on record in support of the freedom to marry as part of the national platform."

[See a collection of political cartoons on gay marriage.]

Gay marriage is a highly contentious issue. Republican presidential candidates fomer Gov. Mitt Romney, former Sen. Rick Santorum, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have all expressed opposition to gay marriage; they all instead support a federal amendment that would make same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Many Democrats oppose gay marriage as well. President Obama opposed gay marriage in his 2008 campaign. However since in office, he has enacted a number of other policies supporting gay rights and said in 2010 that his views on gay marriage were "evolving."  

A U.S. News Debate Club covered both sides of the argument over legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide. Wolson himself stated,

Government has no business blocking people seeking to care for their loved ones, particularly in these tough economic times, nor should it punish children by depriving their families of the critical safety net and meaning marriage brings.

However, according to Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, gay marriage threatens traditional heterosexual marriage:

Changing the natural definition of marriage would amount to a declaration that procreation is unimportant, and that children do not need a mother or father. This would inevitably lead to a further deconstruction of marriage and the family—and fewer children being raised by a married mother and father—at a time when those institutions should be strengthened instead.

With Washington being the latest state to legalize same sex marriage, and Pelosi support of including it in the Democratic platform, it will no doubt be a heated issue in the 2012 election.

What do you think? Should the Democratic Party include gay marriage in its 2012 platform? Take the poll and comment below.

Should the Democratic Party include gay marriage in its 2012 platform?

View Results

Previously: Should the Payroll Tax Cuts Be Extended?

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
LGBT rights,
Barack Obama,
Nancy Pelosi,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Personally, I'm totally in favour of gay marriage, but I think the issue should be left up to each state to decide whether or not to allow it.

Ames of NY 1:34AM August 26, 2012

If Santorum becomes the Republican nominee there would be no political reason for it. The term "Log Cabin Republicans" would mean as much as "Jewish Nazis".

Although polling suggests this issue is trending toward the Democratic side, it probably affects actual votes and turnout more on the anti-gay side.

This is an issue Democrats might want to have patience with.

Steve of FL 9:29AM February 16, 2012

I hope you people realized that as I write this, innumerable married gays around the world are committing acts of what I have taken to calling “homoterrorism”.

Homeland Security agents across this great nation should be on the lookout for same-sex love acts that, while seemingly inconsequential to the untrained eye, are part of a devious conspiracy calculated to destroy Traditional Marriage by promoting a Godless, gay, faux-nuptialed lifestyle. If a large number of lesbians were to hug one another, it could cause the collapse of the Greek economy, for example. (SEE! I TOLD YOU!). A sufficient volume of men kissing other men would undoubtedly result in The End of Days.

In terms of national security, this clearly constitutes a "fuchsia-level" alert situation (which is super-high).

To learn aboutmore on the web at www.mymarriageruinsyours.com

PeteG of ME 8:59PM February 15, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement