• Comment (3)

Should Twitter Be Censored?

Twitter announces it will be able to censor tweets on a country-by-country basis

January 27, 2012 RSS Feed Print

In a blog post, social media service Twitter announced changes to its censorship practices that will allow it to censor certain tweets and users on country-by-country basis:

As we continue to grow internationally, we will enter countries that have different ideas about the contours of freedom of expression…Until now, the only way we could take account of those countries' limits was to remove content globally. Starting today, we give ourselves the ability to reactively withhold content from users in a specific country — while keeping it available in the rest of the world.

Twitter claims that it will do so in a transparent fashion. If a tweet or user is being censored on one's timeline, a "Tweet withheld" message will appear in its place that says, "This tweet from @Username has been withheld in: Country." or "This account has been withheld in: Country." with a link to "Learn more." It is also partnering up free speech organization Chilling Effects to log tweets and users being blocked. However, Internet activists are not satisfied, especially considering the role Twitter played in mobilizing the Arab Spring and other pro-democracy movements. They are organizing a boycott of Twitter for Saturday, January 28, using the hashtag (a tool on social media to disseminate trends) #TwitterBlackout. This protest comes less than two weeks after many websites across the internet blacked out their content in objection to anti-piracy legislation SOPA and PROTECT-IP.

What do you think? Should Twitter be censored? Take the poll and comment below.

Should Twitter be censored?

View Results

Previously: Is Newt Gingrich Right About Going to the Moon?

Tags:
internet,
Twitter

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

California fascists are already working on it. http://youtu.be/x_UV2Mao2-E

Youknow Who of CA 4:51AM January 30, 2012

The answer is absolutely NO ! All of the agencies have a history of magnifying any and every move on privacy. An example would be they are allowed to tap a person's phone calls if they have obtained a warrant. Then they "slip" and fail to get a warrant yet still tape conversations.

Then they continue to eavesdrop on everything that person does even if it is not warrantied. To me they should be required to justify before a judge their intentions and suspicions. They should be allowed to monitor suspicious people ( suspected terrorist) but not everyone in general. Some people joke in a sick manner having no thoughts of doing anything. Some say things to get attention but do not have evil intentions.

So unless the FBI can show cause they should not be able to monitor anyone they want. Some would use the right to monitor wives, husbands, girlfriends, boyfriends etc for their own private reasons. They should still get a warrant.

vageorge of VA 1:54PM January 29, 2012

The censors never give up, and emerge out of every crack. Look at this new film, exposing horrific corruption in Australia:

http://www.expendable.tv

Try to find a single reference to it in the Australian media, online or offline. There is none.

We have Sopa, Pipa, MegaUpload and now Twitter. Depressing.

Nicola Weaver of LA 4:41PM January 27, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

advertisement