• Comment (10)

Zuckerman: With Fracking America Can Escape the Energy Trap

How natural gas can remake our energy future

December 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Can America escape the energy trap? Must our lives and security be forever held hostage to the vagaries of political power in the Middle East oil states? Yes, we can escape, thanks to American technology and enterprise, but only if we can sort out our priorities.

The good news is that America is at the center of a global energy map revolution. Our development of innovative shale gas technology offers the prospect of a huge bonanza of natural gas (and some oil as well). It's the most positive event in the U.S. energy outlook in a half century. Let's celebrate the achievement before looking at what needs to be done to bring it to full fruition.

Our geologists have long been aware that gas (and oil) lies hidden in the country's shale beds and under the ocean, but we had no chance to extract it until American entrepreneurial energy inspired companies to gamble on new technologies.

[See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

In a phrase, technology has trumped geology. Advances in computer processing power yielded seismic mapping and three-dimensional imaging, enabling geologists to "see" through the thick layers of salt obscuring the reservoirs thousands of feet or more below the surface. We've combined that information capacity with new drilling technology. Once we've penetrated thousands of feet of impervious rock with new super strong alloy drill bits, we can turn a corner and continue drilling horizontally for several thousand more feet to reach the buried treasure of millions of cubic feet of gas. It's trapped in the shale, but it can be released by the process known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking." Millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals are blasted in at high pressure. Fissures open up, and the gas seeps out (and oil, too). Fields of energy regarded as dead can be restored to productive life.

The process of finding and producing hydrocarbons from this shale has taken off with such velocity that it has already significantly altered government and corporate energy expectations. The production costs of shale gas are about one half to one third the costs associated with new conventional gas wells in North America. The result is a glut of new supply. The price of natural gas has plummeted. Energy companies have become exporters. The United States has passed Russia as the world's leading gas producer.

[Read Mort Zuckerman, Robert Schlesinger, and other U.S. News columnists in U.S. News Weekly, now available on the iPad.]

Shale gas production is now more than five times what it was in 2006 and has climbed from 2 percent of domestic natural gas production in 2001 to almost 30 percent. A whole series of possible reserves or "plays" are now accessible across the United States, raising the estimates of recoverable shale gas in North America from about 39 trillion cubic feet in 2003 to perhaps 50 times that amount. Recoverable shale gas reserves in the United States are an estimated 600 trillion to 700 trillion cubic feet.

This good news about energy is rare. It represents a broad historical shift. It could bring us back to the time when the United States and its neighbors in the hemisphere were self-sufficient and even a major source of energy for the world at large.

[See a slide show of a reality check on U.S. energy sources.]

So what's the snag—and how serious is it? Communities where fracking has taken place, notably in Ohio and Pennsylvania, protest the noise and scarring of the landscape during the initial explorations. Restoration and compensation can ameliorate those concerns. The most significant fear is that the wastewater with chemicals from the fracking process, called "flowback," can contaminate the aquifers and hence drinking water. State regulators in Alaska, Colorado, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming have stated that there have been no verified or documented cases of groundwater contamination as a result of hydraulic fracking.

Tags:
energy

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have worked in the oilfield 40 years. Fracing has been used in almost every well drilled since 1948. That would total millions of wells fraced here in the US and hundreds of millions of wells world wide.

The eco-nazis are trying their best to get people's panties in a twist about fracing, because it's a new word for lots of people. And it can be painted to be scarey.

Here's the deal about the various shale deposits. The oil companies have known about most of them for years, but they weren't economical to explore. Down here in South Texas, the Eagle Ford shale is booming right now. Each well drilled costs between 5 to 8 million dollars and only about one hole in the ground out of twenty will be a productive well. The only way this field can keep busy is that oil prices remain close or above $100 a barrel.

Ya'll need to get used to the idea that oil prices will more than likely go up than down, and that no amount of drilling is going to supply all of our demands for petroleum. And fracing doesn't hurt anything.

Chuck of TX 10:31AM January 18, 2012

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fracking-20111209,0,1034865.story

The problem with fracking is nobody has really studied it and the few studies we have are inconclusive or damaging. There is zero proof it does no har to drinking water. Last I check clean water was fundamental to life. Let's get our facts first before we do something stupid. Let's also re-examine whether we can do this process more cleanly. AS I understand it, the water can be cleaned after the fracking process, but it would cut in to profits. It would still be profitable, but not as profitable. Boo-hoo. That's the price of doing something well instead of doing something dumb.

Bobbarooni of ID 8:01PM December 09, 2011

Chipmunk, you have filled your gray matter cavity with so many words, that you left no place for facts.

Converting ICE's to NGV is not a complicated nor expensive proposition. Countries like Argentina and Brazil have been doing it for decades, and last time I was there I did not see any huge explosions, nor is there a danger of that happening because of the use of composite material containers which do not blow up in case of accident but release their contents in a harmless manner. If the market will be there you can bet that inexpensive conversion kits will pop up like mushrooms after the rain.The manufacturers will certainly jump in with dual use vehicles. More viable a solution than battery powered vehicles, although Natural gas powered hybrids might be ....well that is another whole subject for discussion.

Rick of CA 8:08AM December 06, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

advertisement