George McGovern: Barack Obama, Democrats Need a Backbone

The one-time presidential candidate discusses what it means to be a "McGovern Liberal"

December 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print

George McGovern, the Democratic presidential nominee in 1972 who also served in the House and Senate, embodies liberal politics so much that his name is evoked pejoratively by conservatives. In What It Means to Be a Democrat, McGovern makes a plea to his party to uphold the values that it used to stand for. McGovern recently spoke with U.S. News about partisanship and what the Democrats should do next. Excerpts:

What does it mean to be a Democrat?

Democrats believe that the federal government is not our enemy, it's our partner.

How is today's Democratic Party doing?

I think it needs a little more backbone. I'm for President Obama and I hope he'll be re-elected. But I think both he and the Democrats in the Congress need a little dose of backbone-itis to stand for the kinds of things that a progressive liberal party should endorse.

[Read more Book Club interviews in U.S. News Weekly, now available on the iPad.]

Should welfare programs be cut to help with the deficit?

Well, the first thing we need to do is to recognize the basic cause of our present $14 trillion [national debt]. When I was a youngster growing up in South Dakota, we never referred to the national debt, it was always referred to as the war debt because it stemmed from World War I. Well, what we have now, at least two thirds of it, is the war debt. We're never going to make a substantial cut in that debt until we quit getting into these unnecessary wars.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit]

Why do you think the antiwar movement didn't gain traction with Iraq as it did with Vietnam?

People didn't have the political guts to stand up against an American war. It took plenty of that back in '63 when I made my first speech against the Vietnam War. My knees were knocking as much as they ever did on those bombing missions I was flying as a bomber pilot in World War II. But for some reason, we don't seem to have the same political courage. People are fearful of defeat, they're fearful of demagoguery, they're fearful of the flag wavers.

What about Occupy Wall Street?

Many Americans believe that this recession was brought on by reckless behavior on the part of big banks and Wall Street. And I think there's something to that. So it's a good thing to march and carry signs and support each other. It lets these individuals know that the American people are not asleep.

[See photos of Occupy Wall Street protests.]

Which element of your 1972 platform would have served the country best had you won?

I called for the immediate withdrawal of all forces from Vietnam. After [Nixon's] four years [as president], we had [already] lost almost half of the men that were killed in the Vietnam War. I think I was absolutely right in calling for an immediate end to the war. I think I said it could be accomplished in 60 days.

You recently spoke with President Obama about bringing the troops home.

He was kind enough to agree to see me, even though he knew I was coming in with a critical appraisal. I [said I] don't agree with this war in Afghanistan and I think we should get out of there. And he said, well, how do you do that? I said, with trucks, the same way we got in there. Load the men up in trucks and take them to the nearest port and bring them home. Well, he said, you can't just withdraw like that. I said, why not? That's how we got in, we just decided to plunge in there. And he said, you know you're preaching to the choir. I said, no I'm not, Mr. President, I'm talking to you, who added another 30,000 to 50,000 troops.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Afghanistan.]

Is Washington partisanship different today?

When I was in the House and then later in the Senate, a total of 22 years, I frequently reached across the aisle and gathered support from some of the Republicans who were reaching back. I teamed up with Bob Dole a number of times. We reformed and expanded school lunches, the food stamp program, and we started a new program for low-income pregnant and nursing mothers. None of those programs would have sailed through Congress if they just had the name McGovern on them, or just had the name Dole on them. Now today you don't see that.

Why not?

Somehow politicians have become convinced that negative campaigning pays off in elections. And another thing that pays off is if you can give the impression that the party in power can't accomplish anything and the way you do that is to block everything they try to do. And this is not a good way to run the government.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the GOP hopefuls.]

How would you define a "McGovern liberal"?

A McGovern liberal is not ashamed of the federal government. It points to a record that's very impressive—Roosevelt's New Deal, Jack Kennedy's New Frontier, and Johnson's Great Society. I wish above all else right now the Democratic Party would come out for universal healthcare. A one-sentence bill: Congress hereby extends Medicare for all Americans.

What would you like your legacy to be?

That I did everything humanly possible to end hunger and malnutrition in this country and in the world around us.

 

 

 

Tags:
George McGovern,
democratic party,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
Occupy Wall Street,
War in Afghanistan (2001-)

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The comments about George McGovern, presidential nominee of 1972 and also that Dems need a backbone. What do these subjects have to do with our current social and economic problems? Why do the Soc/Dems need a backbone? Is it because they have forgotten how to proudly stand up for America and the passages in the Constitution .. giving its citizens the right to protest abuses by the government? Or is it because the Dem/Soc leaders prefer to stay ignorant about Socialism and Communism, and not believe that their decisions can destroy America and our way of life. And rather than stand up and protest the direction that Obama is taking America they would rather stay unified and yet cowardly, in the agenda that Obama has laid out for Americas future. Thus destroying America and incentives for those that can produce jobs, and slowly adding to the destruction of our way of life. How come I have'nt seen one article about Eric Holder and the Fast and Furious scandal? As I had written in 12/6/09 about the encompentency of Eric Holder a Socialist and "Closet Terrorist Sympathizer". Being assigned as the Attorney General by Commie Barack Obama, it seems that my predictions of him have come to be realized. Holder is a coward, and it is because of his anti-American Socialist leanings and his being protected by our Communist leader in the White House, he really dousn't care about defending the Rights of the average American as evidenced by his bringing charges against States that want to defend their borders and protect Americans against illegals or the protective passages in our Constitution. And why should he? Like many of Obamas appointees in his administration, like he were'nt BORN IN THE UNITED STATES and really don't know what it is to BE or FEEL like an American. Both Obama and Holder should resign from their posts because of their incompetency and NO EXPERIANCE in the fields assigned them. All they know is what they were groomed and educated for, to believe in the philosophy of instilling Communism and class mentality into a society, and the prejudices of the dictators of the third world countries. And this is only the beginning of the Communist Obama agenda and the destruction of America and the way we live. By instilling cockroach organizations like Socialists, Communists, Terrorists, and left leaning radicals WITHIN our government, and upsetting the economic and social structure of the American government and our way of life. ARE WE BETTER OFF NOW,than we were before BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA became our president?? ... HELL NO!!! Americans of all cultures, STAND TOGETHER and take back our country by voting out this Communist in 2012!!! Vote for Newt Gingrich, he'll get America back on track ... and Americans back to work!!!

BORN AMERICAN of CA 4:14PM December 08, 2011

"Democrats Need a Backbone"

They showed it. Passing legislation that the polls were against like obamacare.

Reward_ Nov. 2, 2010...

Bill Hedges of MO 10:43PM December 05, 2011

I may not agree with a lot of what he stands for - But by God, he's earned the right to stand his ground.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 11:48AM December 05, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

May Unemployment Rate Dooms Barack Obama

With unemployment now at 8.2 percent, Mitt Romney is poised to gain ground with voters.

Planned Parenthood Pulls a Komen on Mitt Romney

Planned Parenthood successfully targeted the Susan G. Komen Foundation and is now getting political by campaigning against Mitt Romney.

Bill Clinton Undercuts Barack Obama in Wisconsin

Former President Bill Clinton is campaigning for Democrats across the country, disregarding Obama's campaign strategies.

Barack Obama Doesn’t Get a Pass on Poland Gaffe

The president's error and half-hearted apology is a serious diplomatic mistake.

Mitt Romney's Ridiculous Unemployment Reaction

Romney's dramatic reaction to the May jobs report makes him look false and calculating.

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

advertisement