• Comment (8)

Why the Government is to Blame for High College Costs

Federal student loans are driving up college costs and adding to the deficit

November 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Last month President Obama, facing increasingly violent Occupy Wall Street protests nationwide, announced executive action to help alleviate the heavy burden of student debt faced by many of the young, unemployed protesters. Although many of the protesters are blaming private banks and corporate "fat cats" for the financial pickle they're in, the president thought he'd calm them down by easing the terms of repayment and forgiveness. What Obama didn't tell them is that it's really the federal government they should blame.

A year ago, the president signed legislation ending subsidies for private banks giving federally guaranteed student loans—making the federal government, not banks, the lender of choice for most students. You can still get private bank loans for your college education, but since they no longer are backed by the U.S. government, private loans aren't as good a deal anymore; most are variable rate loans that require a co-signer and are difficult to qualify for. So it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why most kids take out federal student loans from the Department of Education now, and leave the bank loans as a last resort.

[U.S. News's Debate Club: Is a College Degree Still Worth It.]

Back in the mid-1980s when I went to college, there was a $2,500 limit on the amount of federal student loans you could take out in a year. I graduated with $10,000 of debt and worked three jobs to pay it off. That's all changed. The limit on federal loans for most students is now $31,000 for four years. These days, the average college senior who had loans graduates with $25,250 in student debt, a new record, with some high-tuition colleges averaging double that, at over $55,000 per student. Unemployment has hit a new high among young people, and their median incomes are falling. Many of them are having trouble finding a job and making their loan payments. A whole generation of middle-class students is being crushed by student debt.

It all goes back to two well-intentioned federal goals: first, that a college education should be within the reach of every American, and second, that if students borrow money from the federal government, they should repay it. Most of us would agree that both are noble goals. But the consequences of both have been stunning.

As a result of the first, the money began to flow; over the last 30 years, inflation-adjusted federal financial aid has quadrupled. Total student debt has now reached the $1 trillion mark, more than the credit card debt of every American combined. The federal deficit in the recently ended fiscal year totaled $1.3 trillion; the debt load carried by college grads now stands at more than two thirds of our nation's massive budget shortfall. According to the College Board, over half of all full-time undergrads at public colleges and universities are now full-time borrowers. At private nonprofit schools, a whopping two thirds have loans.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

The more money the federal government pumps into financial aid, the more money the colleges charge for tuition. Inflation-adjusted tuition and fees have tripled over those same 30 years while aid quadrupled; the aid is going up faster than the tuition. Thanks to the federal government, massive sums of money are available to pay for massive tuitions.

This has nothing to do with costs. According to Neal McCluskey's research at the Cato Institute, it costs roughly $8,000 a year to educate an undergraduate at an average residential college. Yet the average college bill—including room and board—charged at a private four-year university is $37,000, and $16,000 at a public one. For a long time, college tuition has been rising faster than the inflation rate, which certainly has hurt middle-class families. Colleges can raise tuition with impunity because colleges know they'll get paid no matter what.

That brings us to that second well-intentioned federal goal, that all student loans must be repaid. In 1976 federal law was changed to state that student loans would no longer be "dischargeable," or covered by bankruptcy. Along the way, the federal government also removed the requirement that college students have parents or grandparents co-sign for federal loans, making young students solely responsible for payment in full.

Tags:
tuition,
government,
student loans

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I don't see how anyone can blame government help for the high tuition and fees being charged by colleges. I have spent most of my life working in higher ed, and I know that in the past 20 years, the attitude of college administrators (who used to be attracted to academia because they didn't want to be in the corporate rat race) has changed along with the rest of society to one of greed and building one's career. College presidents and top administrators now think they are worth as much as the CEOs and top brass in the corporate world who give themselves obscene salaries. I witnessed twenty years of empire-building at the elite private college where I worked, with students (including my own sons) paying the price. And this doesn't even begin to address the issue of what happened during the Clinton & Bush administrations, when bank lobbyists effectively rewrote the rules so that the banks could become middlemen, lending to students and adding their own layer of profit. Greed is the cause of the problem, not the government's good intentions!

Diana Douglass of PA 9:42AM April 27, 2012

I feel sad for the parents who thought just any old college education at a private college would work and thus went over $100k in debt. A few years of retail or other drudge work under a youngster's belt, they'll have a better idea of what they like and where they want to end up and what the job prospects are in reality. Then they can go to community college part time, while working full time, and get a degree WHILE getting work experience. So many clueless parents out there, raising clueless kids. Sorry, but you'll pay for cluelessness.

Tex of CA 6:52PM April 18, 2012

It's true. When government subsidizes something, it becomes bloated and inefficient.

What happens when you give every kid an America the opportunity to get $1,000 to buy video games with, no payments for 5 years?

1. A lot of kids will sign up - a 9-year-old don't think ahead about their ability to earn and repay $1,000 by the time they're 14.

2. Video game companies will jack up their prices - and the kids won't care because they have $1,000 in their pocket to spend on games.

3. Video game companies will come out with new product offerings - some of those offerings won't be as fun or as good, but some kids will buy them, and that's all that matters.

4. New video game companies will come into existence.

5. More staff will be hired at video game companies - they'll spend a lot on marketing folks, marketing promotions, and maybe a cafeteria with a chef, an on-site dry cleaner, etc.

This is exactly what has happened to the college education market:

You get students majoring in art history, women's studies, religious studies, thinking they'll come out to take advantage of the massive new markets of consumer demand in art history, women's studies, and religious studies.

You have for-profit universities who know 50% of their students eventually default, but they aggressively go after them anyway because the government guarantees those loans, or if not guaranteed, the students can't file bankruptcy but can have wages garnished for life.

You have institutions hiring massive numbers of managers and administrators. Why is it that U.C. Davis has in the last 15 years, increased their number of administrators from roughly 3 per 100 students to roughly 13 per 100, while faculty ratios have remained virtually unchanged? Wouldn't efficiencies and improvements in technology and processes reduce the number of administrators and managers needed? This has been the case across almost all American college/university institutions.

Unfortunately with all this malinvestment and so many warning signs out there (college graduates won't can't find jobs, but are saddled with tens of thousands to over a hundred thousand in debt, a bad economy) that today's students can now see, and parents increasingly unable to sink money into education for their children... There is going to be a major destruction of the post-secondary education bubble in America.

Tex of CA 6:48PM April 18, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

advertisement