• Comment (7)

Government Needs More CEO Help

Successful businessmen like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett have experience their country needs

October 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print

"Visionary." "Fearless." "Genius." Those are the words that kept appearing over and over again in the many obituaries for Apple CEO Steve Jobs. Everyone agreed: Jobs understood what consumers wanted better than most. He was a transformative leader. Jobs once said he wanted to "put a ding in the universe." He did.

Jobs held deep expertise in one area, computer design, but actively acquired knowledge across different areas, such as animation technology, when he helped found Pixar. It was after he returned to Apple in 1996 that Jobs introduced revolutionary products like the iPhone and iPad.

[See photos of Steve Jobs's career.]

It's that ability to create what innovation consultant John Kao calls "recombinant mash-ups" that make a difference. Remember the old ads for Reese's peanut butter cups, when the guy with the peanut butter jar collides with the guy holding the chocolate bar and asks, "Hey, who put chocolate in my peanut butter?" That would be a recombinant mash-up, literally. As Jeff Dyer and Hal Gregersen point out in The Innovator's DNA, Walt Disney was the first to combine animation with full-length films; later, he merged storybook themes and amusement parks for the first time. When a boy asked "Uncle Walt" what he did for a living, Disney replied, "I think of myself as a little bee. I go from one area of the studio to another and gather pollen." Like Disney, Jobs went from industry to industry, cross-pollinating ideas in a way that changed history.

[Ready Mary Kate Cary, Mort Zuckerman, and other U.S. News columnists in U.S. News Weekly, now available on the iPad.]

In January of 2008, Barack Obama said he wanted to be a transformative president, along the lines of Ronald Reagan. "Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path," Obama said, much to the chagrin of the left. Reagan had the depth of experience in different industries that allowed him to become an innovator. Jimmy Carter was not an innovator. Obama, it turns out, is not either. He just didn't have the experience coming into the job.

[Rick Newman: How Steve Jobs Can Save the Economy]

A majority of Americans think we've been on the wrong track for nearly two years. Most of us want to change the trajectory of America. The Tea Party protests were aimed at putting our broken political system back on track. The Occupy Wall Street movement seeks to redirect our economic system. The volatility of the stock market has been matched by the volatility of the race for president, with a different candidate at the top of the polls every few weeks. People are hungry for economic and political certainty. We want a plan for moving forward, and we're not getting it from Washington.

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz recently called on his fellow executives to stop making political contributions to campaigns until elected officials get serious about fixing America's economic problems and reduce the deficit. "Business leaders need to step up and not let Washington dictate a downward cycle in America," he said. There's something else CEOs could do to really step up: become what used to be called "dollar-a-year men."

[Check out political cartoons about the economy.]

During times of national crisis—specifically, World Wars I and II—American business leaders used to serve temporarily in high-level government jobs for the salary of one dollar a year, hence the name. Bernard Baruch, for example, was a stockbroker who agreed to serve as head of the War Industries Board during the Wilson administration. Eugene Meyer, CEO of Allied Chemical and later publisher of the Washington Post, served three different presidents through both world wars and ended up as the chairman of the Federal Reserve. During times of crisis in the 20th century, patriotic CEOs answered when their country called.

Tags:
Warren Buffett,
Steve Jobs,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

RIGHTY REP SHILL MARY CATE CARY POUNDS THE CEO-AS-SAVIOUR THEME TO TRY AND HELP ROMNEY OUT...

What we need in gov't instead of quasi-private-sector CEOs -- which in the current situation means ALL of them are QUASI-private-sector CEOs, emphasis decidedly on the *****QUASI***** -- are Ron Paul types, people with governing and legislative experience who above all else have a firm grasp on what gov't should and should not be involved in.

That way we'd reverse course from the latest quasi-private-sector-CEO-enabled/malinvestment-caused boom-bust business cycle, said malinvestment induced by the combination of global policing, nation destroying then rebuilding, Obamacare, bailouts, stimunots, Fed easy-money policies, DOE, HUD, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac easy-credit policies, etc., etc., etc.

There can be no well done in federal governing -- by a quasi-private-sector CEO or anyone else -- until first there is well begun. And that well begun involves getting out of the things we shouldn't be doing at the federal level to begin with. Ron Paul 2012 is that well begun.

Until we get out of the things we shouldn't be doing at the federal level, quasi-private-sector CEOs like Immelt are foxes guarding the hen house -- with the hens increasingly outsourced to China, Mexico, and India no less. The only person outside of Obama who could have possibly given Immelt a sweeter deal was Mussolini.

With a real governing leader like Paul as president, quasi-private-sector CEOs then would have a better chance to improve and expand their businesses in ways that benefit citizens here -- not in China, Mexico, or India. And consequently, lose the *****QUASI***** dimension.

Let's hope that instead of holding out for some CEO savior, -- the same way others held out for a Community Organizer savior last time around -- more people than not decide to become more innovative at their own personal candidate-selection level to recognize the opportunity for wide-scale federal governing improvement that Paul represents.

dom youngross of OH 7:44PM November 04, 2011

Bring on some new thinkers. The current and older ones certainly lack the ability to adapt to changing economics. Jobs were going overseas long before Obama came into office. It's funny some people never commented on it until he wore the Hat of Responsibility. Job scarcity alone now allows existing big businesses to convice their workers that it is such a burden to even give them health care or a decent wage. Reading the Quarterlies tells me otherwise. Bonus week is even more fun to reason out when one VIP bonus is bigger than the total bonuses of the people department the one VIP oversees.

Big Businesses have cut their department staff size, increased the workloads of those left to do vital jobs, and raked in the saved cash. Did they reinvest it? The thought of that alone makes me chuckle at the absurdity. But their end to such practices is on the horizon. They can sense it like a forest fire just over the next hill about to claim their houses. That's why Banks started making their worst mistakes in panic. "Get their money while we still can!" Muahahhaa... the problem is that The People are finally finding their voice. Oh what a wonderful noise that voice makes. I look forward to hearing more of it.

G L Hill of MI 1:29PM November 03, 2011

Who let a fourth grade student publish an article on US News?

Fire the reporter and the publisher.

Grant Price of WA 3:50PM October 28, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement