• Comment (5)

Obama's Trade Deal Delays Have Cost Jobs

The president's jobs effort is too little, too late, and too political, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus writes

October 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

When President Obama took office in 2009, he found these three trade deals on his desk. They were previously brokered deals that Democrats had blocked in Congress. Estimates at the time suggested they could create billions of dollars in new export revenue for the United States, and access to these markets would create jobs here at home.

But the president brushed them aside, doing the bidding of the labor union bosses that had backed his campaign. Then earlier this year, as he cobbled together a "jobs plan," he called on Congress to pass these trade agreements—pretending this was a bold new idea. Not only was it not new, it was misleading. Republicans wanted to pass them for years, but the president wouldn't do his part and submit them to Congress.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Even then, President Obama stalled for another month before finally sending those trade pacts to Capitol Hill. Once they're enacted, they'll provide a boost to the economy by making U.S. exports more attractive to foreign consumers. But think about what we've lost while the president delayed.

Based on estimates from the International Trade Commission, the Free Trade Agreement with South Korea could increase U.S. exports by $11 billion annually. Over two and half years, that adds up to over $27 billion Obama effectively robbed from U.S. companies.

In the meantime, the European Union's trade agreement with South Korea took effect. The president stalled to win political points, and America lost jobs, revenue, and opportunity.

But that's just South Korea. In Colombia, the United States missed out on another billion dollars a year. Even Democratic Sens. John Kerry and Max Baucus wrote in April, "Each day we fail to act costs American jobs and sales—and sends them elsewhere." Our unemployment rate is above 9 percent, and Obama's inaction meant we lost jobs to China, Argentina, and Europe as they increased their trade with Colombia.

[Vote now: Will Obama be a one-term president?]

You would think the president would learn from this mistake. But he's doomed to repeat it once again—and it will cost more jobs. It's a result of his unrealistic and irresponsible demand that his American Jobs Act be an all-or-nothing proposition.

After his September speech to Congress outlining his plan, it became immediately apparent that it would meet bipartisan opposition in Congress. Many of his proposed tax increases had been defeated when Democrats controlled both houses. And even senators in his own party knew his new spending proposals were the same failed policies of the first stimulus.

[See an opinion slide show of 10 wasteful stimulus projects.]

President Obama ignored that reality and crisscrossed the country for a month demanding Congress "pass this bill right away." He knew it couldn't, but he needed a campaign prop. Republicans, for their part, were ready to work with Democrats on areas of agreement. The president shunned their offers.

On Tuesday, though, the inevitable happened: Democrats and Republicans in the Senate said no to the All-or-Nothing-Jobs-Bill. By the next morning, Democrats were offering to work with Republicans on proposals they could all support. Yet were it not for the president's campaign plans, that work could've started a month earlier. So, how much longer will the president sacrifice the economy for his political ambitions?

[Check out political cartoons about President Obama.]

The president knows he cannot get re-elected on his record. The economy is flailing, and Americans are hurting. His only path to victory relies on misrepresentation and cynical political ploys. He's used the American Jobs Act to knock Republicans in hopes of boosting his political prospects. But the truth is Republicans have been working hard for months; they've passed over a dozen bills in the House that would spur job creation. The president and Senate Democrats, though, have sat on their hands.

It's time for President Obama to truly make jobs his number one priority. The campaign can wait. The American people cannot. Republicans want to get this economy moving. There's no more time for the president's self-interested delay tactics.

Better late than never, sure, but "late" is not good enough.

 

Tags:
international trade,
RNC,
economy,
Obama administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The continuing tool of the president to pass bills that will tell Americans "I take Care of you" which are so flawed or costly, that rational people have to change them, is just a method to keep the Country in "crisis". The President ingeniously blames others for the "Crisis" while rallying his fringe or those who lack knowledge of capitalism to his real goals of the continuing Crisis which is 4 more years..

Gerryww of WI 3:58PM October 17, 2011

Great yet another free trade deal that will benefit billionaire importers. I love how they neglected to mention that a hefty part of the 11 billion income would be a result of the convoluted math that allows them to count off shoring of US jobs as export profit.

Swiftright of PA 3:41PM October 16, 2011

"If they were on his desk when he arrived, why didn't Bush sign them?'

The total ignorance of you Bush haters is astounding.

These were trade agreement negotiated by the Bush administration. He passed them to Congress for approval, but they were passed back to him by the Democrat-controlled Congress of the time.

THE PRESIDENT CANNOT SIGN A BILL UNTIL IT GETS PASSED BY CONGRESS, moron.

junior of DC 8:20PM October 14, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement