Mort Zuckerman: How to Rein In Healthcare Costs

Medicare and Medicaid are zombie entitlement programs that threaten the U.S. fiscal future

October 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Babies become old men and women. Of course! We know it as a biological fact. We know, too, that from 1946 to 1964 there was a postwar boom in babies. Still, it is something of a shock to realize that beginning Jan. 1, 2011, the first baby boomers became­—statistically—retirees. More of a shock still is that there are 79 million more baby boomers headed for retirement. And the biggest shock of all is that we don't have the money to ensure the good health of those onetime babies.

[Read Mort Zuckerman and other columnists in U.S. News Weekly, now available on iPad.]

The baby boomers are a critical element of the explosion in healthcare costs—but not the only one. The projected increases in Medicare and Medicaid to treat the old, the sick, and the poor represent the greatest risk facing America's fiscal future. Those increases could raise deficits dramatically in the 2020s and 2030s. Entitlements, primarily Social Security augmented by Medicare and Medicaid and other retiree programs, now constitute roughly half of non-interest federal spending. These transfers have become so huge that, unless checked, they will sabotage America's future. Arithmetic still matters.

[Scott Galupo: Republicans Are Best Hope for Entitlement Reform]

The Medicare hospital insurance trust fund is running a deficit and could be exhausted by 2024. Employer costs for health benefits, meanwhile, have been rising far faster than worker productivity in the postwar period. Employer health benefit costs have increased from approximately 0.5 percent of total compensation in 1950 to over 8 percent today. Healthcare premiums paid directly by workers have soared in recent years, outpacing wage increases and inflation, rising 131 percent between 2001 and 2011 for a family. Employer costs have gone up 113 percent over the same period.

Medicaid now pays for both health and long-term care for 55 million needy Americans. It finances more than one third of all births in the United States and pays the cost of almost two thirds of the people in nursing homes. The federal government underwrites one half to three quarters of the cost, depending on the state. Even so, Medicaid is the second biggest and fastest-growing category of spending by states. Costs are up more than 50 percent in the last five years. They are expected to exceed $450 billion this year and to keep growing by about 8 percent annually for the next decade.

By the mid-2030s, the 65 and over population will nearly double. By then, their healthcare costs may be completely out of control, resulting in a tidal wave of federal spending to sustain these programs. At the end of fiscal 2010, medical programs for seniors made up the bulk of the government's total unfunded liability—estimated at $63 trillion, or over $200,000 per person and $500,000 per household.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

All the (true) scary projections about America's long-term fiscal imbalances demand a fundamental change in how we manage healthcare. The costs are at the core of the impending fiscal crisis, which is bad enough, but the consequence isn't just a tide of red ink. Unless we get the costs under control, we will be confronted by a crippling inability to invest in other areas of national need.

Erskine Bowles, cochair of the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction commission, put it well: "It is a fiscal crisis that is completely predictable and from which there is no escape."

What can be done? Peter Orszag, who while director of the Office of Management and Budget was at the center of the healthcare reform negotiations, points out that costs are heavily concentrated among a small number of relatively sick patients. The top 5 percent of Medicare beneficiaries, ranked by cost, account for roughly 40 percent of total Medicare spending, and the top 25 percent account for more than 85 percent of total costs.

This is where we must focus our efforts. We must stop the epidemic of procedures that neither the patient's needs nor the results can justify. Orszag offers evidence for this assertion: Renowned institutions like the Mayo Clinic are delivering high-quality healthcare at substantially lower cost by using information technology intensely, examining best practices rigorously, focusing on doctors' financial incentives, and utilizing procedures to minimize mistakes

Tags:
Congress,
Medicaid,
Medicare,
healthcare,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Get the Government out of the medical business unless you want Healthcare to end up like the United States Postal Service. Higher and higher cost with poorer and poorer service. (Nothing against the fine people who deliver the mail - It's the bureaucrats in charge).

M. Martin of TN 10:55PM January 08, 2012

I have an idea!

Increase the number of doctors being trained at medical schools.

It is the American way - historicly, whenever a subset of workers earn too much money, you can bet your sweet ass management floods that field with workers. Thus decreasing monies paid to that subset. These workers are either imported or are trained at temporary training faciities,

My question is - how come doctors do not have to worry about an increase in the numbrt of doctors in the field?

Tommy of PA 7:13PM November 05, 2011

OK, I'll wade in with my thoughts, having had a spouse directly involved in health care administration and being an above average consumer (due to hereditary reasons).

It all has to start with tort reform. Something like a state administered (gasp) program akin to workmen's compensation. Patient's would be paid on a specific schedule dependent on the extent of their disability related to the doctor's malpractice. Doctor's wouldn't have the ability to police themselves any longer, and the new healthcare injury compensation board would deal with punitive actions directed at doctors who repeatedly injure patients. I can see the doctor's and lawye's lobbyists not liking this too much. Injured patients would no longer be given astronomical sums, but instead, given specific payouts for lost wages, and costs related to medically caring for them. Right off the bat, we'd save 33% by cutting out the middlemen, the lawyers.

Next up is the supply of physicians. The infrastructure projects I'd like to see being built would be much larger physician training colleges. The supply of doctors simply has to be increased. Of course, other specialties should also see an increase in numbers, specifically nurses, physician's assistants, and other technical specialties needed to cover all these people. More hospitals need to be built, and staffed, instead of only one or two major hospitals in a major city.

Hospitals need to be held to account for the increases in costs far above inflation. If one looks at the cost curve, for health care, it's increasing in an exponential rate and is unsustainable.

Another area that would save tremendous money is delivery of primary health care to urban populations by constructing clinics located throughout a city. These clinics would have 2 - 3 doctors, and a dozen physician assistants. They could deal with the day to day health needs of most of the urban poor.

Ok, I know its a sacred cow, but the last one is pharmaceutical companies. They will simply have to reduce their R & D budgets, and should be treated like public utilities, in that the owners and shareholders should be given fair, but not excessive, profits. Yep, they have shown they are not to be trusted and need some oversight.

Kevin of NH 2:48AM October 20, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

May Unemployment Rate Dooms Barack Obama

With unemployment now at 8.2 percent, Mitt Romney is poised to gain ground with voters.

Planned Parenthood Pulls a Komen on Mitt Romney

Planned Parenthood successfully targeted the Susan G. Komen Foundation and is now getting political by campaigning against Mitt Romney.

Bill Clinton Undercuts Barack Obama in Wisconsin

Former President Bill Clinton is campaigning for Democrats across the country, disregarding Obama's campaign strategies.

Barack Obama Doesn’t Get a Pass on Poland Gaffe

The president's error and half-hearted apology is a serious diplomatic mistake.

Mitt Romney's Ridiculous Unemployment Reaction

Romney's dramatic reaction to the May jobs report makes him look false and calculating.

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

advertisement