Dick Cheney: Defense Spending Doesn't Drive Debt Problem

The former vice president is not apologizing in his book 'In My Time'

September 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Few politicians evoke such strong reaction from the public as does former Vice President Dick Cheney. He is either praised or criticized for his convictions, and his recent memoir has predictably created controversy. In My Time, written with his daughter Liz Cheney, covers Cheney's life and his almost 40 years in politics. He says his personal chronicle is honest and accurate and that critics won't find any apologies for policy decisions they may disagree with. Cheney, who served as George W. Bush's vice president, wants the memoir to help people better understand "what it is we did and why we did it." He recently spoke with U.S. News about his motivation for writing the book, his response to critics, and his view on how history will judge the Bush administration. Excerpts:

Is there any significance to the timing of your book?

Basically it's because I left office in January of 2009, signed a contract in the summer, and finished it a little bit delayed. I was in the hospital for a period of time; I had heart surgery. I [wanted] to get it done before the next election. But it's something I thought of off and on over the years. It represents 70 years of my life and it seemed like a good time to write it.

[See a photo gallery of Bush's legacy.]

Critics have described the memoir as being especially unapologetic. How do you respond to this?

Well, you know, the interesting thing about the people who want apologies is they don't want just any old apology, they usually have a policy ax to grind. And what they want you to do is to apologize for whatever it is they disagreed with and I don't operate that way.

Did you collaborate with any cabinet members about your recollection of events?

I had a lot of records left over over the years. I had three oral histories done on my time at the Defense Department. I had notes from prior administrations that I had worked in. I didn't keep a diary, but I had accumulated a lot of paper. We used that primarily as the basis on which to write the book. I did not consult with other members of the cabinet.

[Washington Whispers: Cheney Wanted Rumsfeld As Bush's VP]

How do you respond to criticism of your accounts of events?

Well, there are differences. I thought it was important to accurately and honestly portray those differences, not to fizz them up. So you know, none of it is personal. It's intended to be a clear statement of what I believed and why I did what I did. And some people will like it and some won't. But that's the nature of the business.

You were outspoken about President Obama's positions on national security. What is your assessment now?

Well, I think he started out very shaky. And the thing that bothered me most is when they first took over they talked about prosecuting the people in the intelligence community who had carried out our counterterrorism policies—things like enhanced interrogation, for example. I thought that was a terrible precedent. They were going to close Guantánamo [Bay detention camp]; of course Guantánamo is still open. So there have been some things where they campaigned hard against what we'd been doing. But once they got into office I think they discovered that some of those policies were sound and needed to be continued. I think they did well when they captured and killed Osama bin Laden. On the other hand, all of the talk on cutting the defense budget is potentially very damaging to national security.

[See photos of the prison at Guantánamo Bay.]

Are the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributing to the deficit problem?

No, the debt problem that we've got is driven much more by entitlement programs than it is by defense spending. Now, you can occasionally find that savings in the defense budget, but it's not going to be the kind of savings that are going to let you deal with a long-term debt problem.

Do you stand by the Bush administration's decision to lower taxes and ask Americans to shop in response to 9/11?

I do. It was very important to get the economy going again. The stock market was closed for a week, the transportation system was shut down, tourism and so forth devastated. What we did is reduce rates for everybody who was paying income taxes. We cut the tax on capital gains and dividends. If we had run out then and raised taxes, I think it would have done serious damage to the economy.

Tags:
Bush administration,
9/11,
George W. Bush,
national security terrorism and the military,
Dick Cheney

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The new definition of "entitlement programs" is foreign aid.

I find it remarkable that politicians would even whisper the word "taxes," when usury is the glaring hidden tax on us all.

The United States of America is a slave to the international bankers.

As for Afghanistan and Iraq; they should be paying a "service charge" to the United States, in the form of their own mineral and oil wealth.

Donald J. Trump is right. The spoils of war must be garnered.

T.H. Asgardson of CA 4:10PM October 30, 2011

It would be difficult to find any president who has done more damage to America than the last one (GW Bush).

For example, On February 27, 2001, in his first address before Congress, GW Bush assured that his budget would: “prepare for the unexpected, for the uncertainties of the future” by setting aside “a contingency fund for emergencies or additional spending needs” totaling “almost a trillion dollars.” But he did not, and only two years later, The Wall Street Journal reported that Bush used “all the Social Security surpluses...to fund the government for the next two years and to spend well over $100 billion of Social Security funds in each of the following three years.”

Bush accomplished this feat by using a “sunset provision” lie to overcome the “Byrd Rule,” and thus his Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) was signed into law on 7 June, 2001. “One of the most notable characteristics of EGTRRA is that its provisions are designed to sunset, or revert to the provisions that were in effect before it was passed. EGTRRA will sunset on January 1, 2011 unless further legislation is enacted to make its changes permanent. The sunset provision SIDESTEPS the Byrd Rule, a Senate rule that amends the Congressional Budget Act to allow Senators to block a piece of legislation if it purports to significantly increase the federal deficit beyond a ten-year term. The sunset allowed the bill to stay within the letter of the PAYGO law while removing nearly $700 billion from amounts that would have triggered PAYGO sequestration.”

In addition, Bush falsely involved America in a war that still drags on. In a speech in Cincinnati on Oct. 7, 2002, Bush said, “If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today - and we do...” But in a 2/24/01 interview in Cairo, Egypt, Collin Powell said: “And frankly they (sanctions) have worked. He (Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction.” And On 29 July 2001 Condoleezza Rice indicated the weakness of Iraq when she said “the country is divided, arms have been kept from him and his military forces have not been rebuilt.”

Also, according to a 11/26/09 article in Forbes (http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/25/shared-sacrifice-war-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html) “Republicans have been characterized by two principal positions: They like starting wars and don't like paying for them. George W. Bush initiated two major wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but adamantly refused to pay for either of them by cutting non-military spending or raising taxes… Bush and his party, which controlled Congress from 2001 to 2006, never asked for sacrifices from anyone except those in our nation's military and their families.”

Barney Murrell of IL 7:00PM October 14, 2011

The Woof of AR

Before Bush became President, Bill Clinton, Sen Clinton, Pelosi, and other Deocrats was pushing need for war. Senator obama was for Afgan war.

obama is "Chick Hawks when it came to war having never served." He gave us non'war. He could stop using drones.

Bill Hedges of MO 11:47PM October 06, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

May Unemployment Rate Dooms Barack Obama

With unemployment now at 8.2 percent, Mitt Romney is poised to gain ground with voters.

Planned Parenthood Pulls a Komen on Mitt Romney

Planned Parenthood successfully targeted the Susan G. Komen Foundation and is now getting political by campaigning against Mitt Romney.

Bill Clinton Undercuts Barack Obama in Wisconsin

Former President Bill Clinton is campaigning for Democrats across the country, disregarding Obama's campaign strategies.

Barack Obama Doesn’t Get a Pass on Poland Gaffe

The president's error and half-hearted apology is a serious diplomatic mistake.

Mitt Romney's Ridiculous Unemployment Reaction

Romney's dramatic reaction to the May jobs report makes him look false and calculating.

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

advertisement