Should the Defense of Marriage Act Be Repealed?

A Senate bill would require federal law to recognize same-sex marriages conducted in states where it's legal

July 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (32)

The Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, is on trial in Congress this week five months after the Justice Department announced it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the act in court. The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing Wednesday morning to discuss the Respect for Marriage Act, which would repeal its 1996 predecessor. President Obama, who the White House says has “long called for a legislative repeal of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act,” supports the repeal.

The Respect for Marriage Act states that the federal law must recognize same-sex marriages conducted where such unions are legal. [Read the U.S. News Debate: Is the Defense of Marriage Act Constitutional?]

Repeal supporters at Wednesday’s hearing told how the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, has prevented gay couples from having the kind of financial security heterosexual married couples have, including getting on a partner’s employer-provided medical insurance or inheriting a partner’s Social Security benefits.

Critics of repeal cite the overwhelming support for DOMA in 1996—the act passed by 85-14 in the Senate and 342-67 in the House. Some also bristle at the dismissal by gay activists of “deeply held religious beliefs” as “attitudes and stereotypes.” [See a roundup of political cartoons on gay marriage.]

One witness at the hearing, Thomas Minnery of conservative Focus on the Family, cited a study that he said suggests children are better off if they are raised in a household headed by a man and a woman, based on several factors (though Sen. Al Franken disputed Minnery's interpretation of the study). The Judiciary Committee’s Ranking Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley agrees with this line of thinking, saying marriage between a man and a woman has been the foundation of society for 6000 years around the world. Marriage “creates incentives for husbands and wives to support each other and their children,” he said in remarks prepared for the hearing. “It exists more to benefit children than adults.”

What do you think? Should the Defense of Marriage Act be repealed? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Should the Defense of Marriage Act be repealed?

View Results

Previously: Would migraines affect Michele Bachmann's ability to be president?

Tags:
Al Franken,
LGBT rights,
Congress,
Barack Obama,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (32)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Defense of Marriage Act should be upheld because the legalization of gay and lesbian marriages would harm the sanctity of marriage, would increase the probability of homosexuality becoming the societal “norm”, and would increase the number of children being placed into the homes of homosexual partners.

Jill Caudill of NC 4:22AM March 19, 2012

I am a soldier in the united states army. I love defending my country, and as a medic I love my job and I do everything I can to save my brothers and sisters in combat. Unfortunately, my partner may never be able to be by my side if I were to be wounded. We do not get the same benefits as my other married friends have. We struggle with this. We love each other deeply and all we want is equality. I am not asking for special treatment, I just ask to be treated equally. And for those who say being gay is a choice, if you were given the option to fly first class or coach, would you choose coach? Knowing how easier and comfortable first class would be? Knowing they get privileges you can't get? NO. It is not a choice. We are being treated as second class citizens, I wish for better things for this country, for it's citizens;all of them. I am doing what I can and am just asking for the same from everybody else.

Ellierengill of WA 11:33AM February 01, 2012

Scientists decoding the human genome have discovered that about 78 genes separate men from women. However, a defect in one or two gens, chemical imbalances or psychological disorders could affect someones sexual orientation. Converting a man in to a woman or a woman to a man is completely unthinkable and impossible. It is always possible to medically and psychologically treat gay and lesbian individuals to normalcy. With all due respect to their choice of sexual orientation, I have found their argument and claim to promote their physical or physiological disorder into a normal way of life (norm) totally unacceptable. I deeply reject marriage between same sex individuals or to allow kids to be adopted by same sex partners. Allowing children to be adopted and raised in a family formed by same sex partners deprives children a natural and normal upbringing and subjects the children to involuntarily undergo a continuous state of mental confusion in their tender ages causing psychological and emotional turmoils and sufferings. The adults are their choice, but why the kids?

Yonas Debela of WA 5:30AM January 07, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

advertisement