Was the Casey Anthony 'Not Guilty' Verdict the Right One?

Everyone seems to want a say in whether or not Anthony killed 2-year-old Caylee

July 6, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (76)

In the aftermath of the dramatic reading of Casey Anthony's murder trial verdict, everyone seems to want a say in whether or not the jury made the right choice. Trial goers in Florida spoke to reporters outside the courthouse about their anger at the "not guilty" verdict, and others trusted the jury’s judgment, pointing out that the nation’s law requires the prosecution to prove a charge beyond reasonable doubt.

Many people following the trial were surprised by the straight-out acquittal on the murder and child abuse charges, assuming that Anthony would have at least been found guilty of a lesser charge in connection with her 2-year-old daughter Caylee’s death, rather than only a few misdemeanors for lying to police. Details of jury deliberations have begun to leak out, and an alternate juror told NBC’s Today show prosecutors “didn't present the evidence that would have sustained either a murder charge or a manslaughter charge,” he said, adding that a motive wasn't clear. “Just because Casey was a party girl did not show why she would … kill Caylee.”

U.S. News blogger Leslie Marshall, who believes Anthony is guilty of murder, thought the verdict was outrageous. “What message does this send to all the young girls who might have gotten pregnant before they wanted to and feel burdened by a baby when they’d rather get tattoos, party like rock stars, and sleep around?” she writes. “Will they think, hey, if I have a baby and kill it, I won’t go to jail, I’ll be on television(!!!), all eyes will be on me, I’ll get a book deal.”

But fellow U.S. News blogger Susan Milligan thinks such judgment by people who were not on the jury creates a mob bloodlust that, she says, thankfully did not infect the jury’s deliberations. “A guilty verdict also would have satisfied the mentality of those used to television crime-and-prosecution dramas, where the bad mother is made to pay, perhaps with her life, for her crimes, and the innocent little girl is given some justice,” Milligan writes. “But the fundamentals of our criminal justice system dictate that the case be evaluated on the facts, and not the emotions of an angry mob whose members were not in the courtroom every day or bound by rules of evidence.”

What do you think? Was the Casey Anthony verdict the right one? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Was the Casey Anthony verdict the right one?

View Results

Previously: Should Congress and the White House make a “mini” debt ceiling deal?

Reader Comments Read all comments (76)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

She killed her own 2 YEAR old daughter! she should be in prison or even worse

cara of OH 10:58AM March 06, 2012

Those who continue to persecute and malign Ms. casey are the LD with arms extending, fingers pointing, mouths wide opening and evil proclivities protruding.

http://roma.indymedia.org/prin​table/taxonomy/term/1549

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/stat​ement.html

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/oliv​erwendallhol.html

geral of TX 11:56AM July 09, 2011

It's what can be *proven*. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Now, one *can* argue about what constitutes "reasonable"; since there is no objective standard specified; but *desires* have no place on a jury.

Yes, Casey's activities "raise questions"; but "raising questions" isn't supposed to convict someone. The *answers* to those questions may; but one has to have real answers, not speculation.

That was the problem here. There was a lot of speculation, but little facts, in most cases not even close to conclusive. For a murder trial, you really need to prove (1) that the person was actually murdered; and (2) that the person charged did it. Actually neither of those things occurred in this trial. Perhaps they never could have been, or perhaps the prosecutors jumped the gun and should have waited in the hopes of finding something more conclusive, who knows? It was a judgment call on the part of the DA's office.

I have seen some folks speculate that before DNA and such, she probably would have gotten convicted. Personally, I'm not sure. While some of the forensics evidence now available can certainly clinch a case; the basic requirements haven't really changed. A lot of folks convicted for crimes way back when were convicted on the basis of conclusive evidence - murder weapon found in their possession, eyewitness testimony to the crime, or even them bragging or admitting their guilt to a 3rd party. None of that was done here.

The fact is, if there *is* a guilty party, with no other witnesses, and they keep their mouth shut, we may never really know with any degree of actual (not supposed) certainty what really happened to Caylee. That in and of itself *requires* a not guilty verdict under the constraints of our legal system.

Orlando Native of FL 6:48PM July 07, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

advertisement