A New Way Forward for U.S. High Schools

Three ways U.S. high schools are failing their students

June 10, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Jeff Livingston, senior vice president, McGraw-Hill Education Applied College and Career Readiness Learning Solutions Center

As the school year begins to wind down and high school graduation ceremonies loom, educators and parents alike must take a hard look at whether our nation's 17- and 18-year-olds are truly prepared for college or their careers. Have we set them up for success or failure?

While it's easy to get swept up in the celebratory period of proms, college acceptance letters, senior trips, and caps and gowns, we must acknowledge the sober realities that lie before us. Nearly one quarter of students drop out of high school each year, and of those who attend college, 25 percent drop out before the end of their first semester—principally, because they're ill prepared for the academic, financial, and emotional rigors of higher education.

Our high school seniors, on the brink of adulthood, are about to enter the real world in which a highly competitive, deadline-driven global economy requires their talent and skills and their ability to think critically, work collaboratively, and be accountable. America's economic livelihood depends on it. [Check out the best high schools in the nation.]

President Obama brought the issue of college and career readiness to the forefront when he said that every U.S. high school student should make plans to attend college or pursue career-specific job training. While his message is powerful and important, fundamental problems exist in our current educational system that must be addressed before these goals can be met. Namely, we must challenge and re-imagine the entire purpose and design of the American high school, which is stuck in a 19th-century model that is failing our students and our country.

The three primary issues:

1. High schools have college tunnel vision. High schools currently present students with almost zero alternatives to college, such as much-needed technical training for those who have no plans to pursue a college education. Technical education has fallen by the wayside in the U.S.—much to our economic disadvantage—and has undeservedly retained a negative stigma.

The alternative: Reinvent the high school "tracking" system and provide all students with real-world experiences. High schools should not pigeon-hole students into either an academic track or a vocational/technical track; in fact, schools should expose students to number of different options for whatever comes next in their lives—whether it be a 2- or 4-year university, community college, occupational training program, or military service. Additionally, high schools should offer and facilitate more opportunities for internships and apprenticeships, which enable students to make more informed decisions about their career choices. In the United States, only 0.3 percent of the workforce currently acquires skills through an apprenticeship; in Austria, 40 percent of teens (age 15) enter an apprentice program.

2. Schools are too focused on making students "college eligible" versus "college ready." A growing number of high school seniors are not adequately prepared to perform at the college level when they arrive, leading to remediation and dropout rates that are unacceptably high. According to a 2005 report, 63 percent of students at two-year colleges and 40 percent of those at four-year institutions require remedial courses upon entrance.

The alternative: Implement a rigorous curriculum that includes increasingly more challenging work, aligned with formal instruction that supports the pursuit of a successful career in any field. All college-bound seniors should experience a seamless transition from high school to college, and this can only be achieved through a national effort that aligns state high school standards and assessments with the current demands of college and career success and requires all high school graduates to complete a curriculum designed specifically to help make them college- and career-ready.

Tags:
education,
education policy,
K-12 education

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I never attended collage but I provided a stimulating home environment for my children. My oldest two attended a state collage after graduating from a public high school and acquired advanced degrees. One has an English PhD the other a law degree. My youngest son attended a small church school that used the A.C.E. Christian curriculum. He then attended the local junior collage for two years. He was waiting for his girlfriend to graduate high school and choose a collage to attend. He then applied and was easily accepted to that same collage.

I expected a lot out of my children and encouraged them to do well in school. My wife and I sacrificed time and money to see that they had the materials and home life to be well prepared for school. My children were lucky that computers were my hobby and I was an early adapter for new technology. In 1985 my daughter was able to write her English reports on my computer and my son was able to use a statistical program he wrote on his computer to win a blue ribbon at his high school science fair.

I do believe that there is a digital divide and students without the money for equipment and parents who care about technology will have a difficult time doing collage work. My son will be going to collage with a laptop, a high performance gaming computer and an Android smartphone. Any child that hasn't learned to use the internet for research and communication will be seriously handicapped in a collage environment. Applying to a collage and arranging financing would be almost imposable with internet access and most communication with the teachers is by e-mail.

Dan M of FL 5:09AM June 24, 2011

The answer to the above issues can easily be addressed and problems solved by implementing a cirriculum of preferential learning. I have developed a Preferential Learning Theory that has undergone a test run in one lesson plan for Advanced Auto Shop at grade level 10-12. It was a great success.

I have designed a curriculum which places students at the grade 9 level in programs within the cirriculum in subject areas as a major which is one they would like to develop in academically. It assesses students finding their preferences and opening up possibilities that are available in career goals. This points students in a direction they find to their liking while at the same time supplies adapts academic lesson plans to meet preferential subject matter. It has the ability to fulfill all academic requirements and beyond what is required by state boards contingent on the performance of the student. It should go without saying that, when a student is working on something they prefer which can lead to a career in a field they enjoy, they will have a high likelihood of academic success because they will be motivated to do so in order to gain the reward of achieving their goals.

In education motivation is imperative and preparation for college or the workplace can best be found by directing students toward something they have a natural ability to perform well at or are attracted to and will work hard to obtain the necessary abilities to perform well at.

I am currently a student at USC in the MAT program and I am going to be dropping out. My reason is that USC has no interest ion looking into the merits of the theory i have briefly described here. USC has a restrictive approach to education and is moving education int this country away from success in the global environment which is today's world. USC is stuck in the status qou stagnation pool and will slowly deteriorate unless that get on track and fast.

Kermit Greer of CA 1:14AM June 11, 2011

My child was humiliated by counselors at her school for not wanting to go to college. She was given inappropriate paperwork, made to attend college fairs, and queried every day until she told me what was going on and I called the school. She is in trade school now with others who wasted their time and money going to college only to end up in trade school studying what they love to do. I was the opposite. I had to fight to get my college education. I believe deeply in education and the opportunities it affords. But for a child who is not in love with school and for whom the idea of attending college is depressing, I feel we as a society lack the creative insights to channel these children toward their futures. And even though she chose a different path, she was not at all college ready. But she knew how to take a test.

Cynthia of NJ 4:32PM June 10, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement