Is Supreme Court Right to OK Arizona's 'Business Death Penalty'?

The Supreme Court upholds an Arizona law cracking down on companies that hire illegal immigrants

May 26, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

Arizona won a key victory in its fight to enforce illegal immigration, as the Supreme Court ruled to uphold a 2007 law dubbed the “business death penalty.” The law will allow state authorities to revoke business licenses from companies that knowingly hire illegal immigrant workers, on the company’s second offense. A first offense means a suspension of 10 days or more. The law also requires businesses to vet prospective hires using E-Verify, a government program that checks workers’ legal status to ensure they are eligible for employment in the United States. The ruling sets a precedent for other states looking for ways to crack down. [Read Obama's four ways forward on immigration reform.]

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, business owners, and civil-rights groups—as well as the Obama administration—all opposed this law on the grounds that it puts a burden on employers, could cause workplace discrimination, and infringes on the federal government’s immigration enforcement. The state argued that regulating business licenses is within its jurisdiction.

“Arizona has taken the route least likely to cause tension with federal law,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the court’s majority opinion. “It uses the Federal Government’s own definition of ‘unauthorized alien’ … and it requires Arizona employers to use the Federal Government’s own system for checking employee status.” [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on immigration reform.]

In one of the dissenting opinions, Justice Stephen Breyer writes that federal law pre-empts any state effort at imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants, and he also believes the law will have a negative effect. “Either directly or through the uncertainty that it creates,” he writes, “the Arizona statute will impose additional burdens upon lawful employers and consequently lead those employers to erect ever stronger safeguards against the hiring of unauthorized aliens—without counterbalancing protection against unlawful discrimination.”

This is only one of many such fights to come, as Arizona’s controversial immigration laws from 2010 are still winding their way up through the justice system. [Read Obama's four roadblocks to immigration reform.]

What do you think? Was the Supreme Court right to OK Arizona’s “business death penalty” immigration law? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Was the Supreme Court right to OK Arizona’s “business death penalty” immigration law?

View Results

Previously: Will you watch the Sarah Palin documentary?

Tags:
immigration reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

But illegals can not draw unemployment because they work under the table. No legal social security card.

Bill Hedges of MO 7:15PM May 27, 2011

It is not the function of the Supreme Court to decide if a law is "right or wrong". That is what we elect politicians to do.

The Supreme Court's function is to determine if a law in constitutional. That is a completely different function. In this case the Supreme Court determined that the Arizona law in constitutional. Nothing more. "Right or wrong" is not relavent to the Court's proceedings.

Bob of TX 10:06AM May 27, 2011

I applaud this decision by the Supreme Court and hope that most states pass similar laws. Although, I would rather see federal legislation forcing all employers to use E-Verify for all employees. The federal SAVE Act would accomplish this.

Nothing in this law conflicts or preempts federal law, as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Attorney General claimed. The court ruled the state is on "correct" legal grounds when state law mirrors federal law. This ruling may be a good indicator the SB1070 will be upheld.

Visit Numbers USA and ALIPAC websites and help fight illegal immigration.

magyart of OH 2:00AM May 27, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

advertisement