To Fix the Budget Deficit, Raise Corporate Taxes

Revenue neutral corporate tax reform would be a missed opportunity

May 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Huge corporations, such as ExxonMobil, have recently had years where they paid literally nothing to the U.S. Treasury, despite making huge profits. The New York Times made waves by finding that General Electric paid no federal income tax last year, instead pocketing hundreds of millions of dollars in tax benefits. Mega-manufacturer Boeing has done the same, paying no federal taxes in 2009 while collecting $132 million in tax benefits. Google last year had a 2.4 percent effective tax rate, while California-based Broadcom's rate was just 1.4 percent, far below the rate that the average American pays.

The Treasury Department estimated in 2007 that corporate tax preferences cost $1.2 trillion in lost revenue over a decade. So there is ample room to remove credits and deductions (like those that benefit, amongst others, hugely profitable oil companies and agribusinesses), lower the statutory rate, while still bringing in more revenue. Some companies would see their taxes go up, but others would see their tax bills drop, and the corporate tax code would be more fair, efficient, and competitive, while ensuring that all corporations pay their fair share.

As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities put it, "corporate tax reform is a solid candidate to make a contribution to fiscal improvement … Taking a major revenue source off the table for deficit reduction at the outset would be ill-advised." Indeed, with corporate profits skyrocketing—up 81 percent over a year ago—and corporations sitting on trillions in cash reserves, there is no reason that corporate tax reform should be done in a way that is deficit neutral, besides the fact that raising more revenue will be politically difficult, as corporations will likely throw their considerable lobbying weight against such a move. But in the end, failing to raise additional corporate tax revenue will simply shift more of the deficit reduction burden onto a middle-class already battered by the Great Recession.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Paul Ryan,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

1. "'Revenue neutral' is Republicanese for 'don't raise taxes'"

"Lying About Bush's Tax Cuts"

"According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

_____

2. "Ryan and the Republicans are trying to balance the budget by killing Medicare for retired middle-class voters "

"Why Paul Ryan’s Medicare Is So Much Better Than Obama’s"

Posted on May 7, 2011 by Barbara

Peter Ferrara

"Obama said regarding the Ryan budget plan, “No I don’t think it is particularly courageous. Because…nothing is easier than solving a problem on the backs of people who are poor or people who are powerless or don’t have a lobbyist or don’t have clout.”

"How does obamacare cut cost, but help "people who are poor or people who are powerless or don’t have a lobbyist or don’t have clout.”

"cuts in payments to doctors and hospitals under Medicare as provided in current law due to Obamacare and President Obama’s Medicare reimbursement policies is $15 trillion!"

"These Medicare cuts were the foundation for CBO finding that Obamacare would actually reduce the deficit, despite adopting or expanding three entitlement programs.

"Medicare’s Chief Actuary reports that even before these cuts already two-thirds of hospitals were losing money on Medicare patients."

"The unworkable, draconian effect of these Medicare cuts is why the U.S. Government Accountability Office issued a disclaimer..."

Unlike Ryan’s careful Medicare reforms, these draconian, unworkable, Obamacare cuts to Medicare apply to seniors already retired today. Ryan exempts from any change all seniors retired today and everyone over age 55. On these grounds alone, Ryan’s Medicare is better for today’s seniors than Medicare under Obamacare.

That will involve an additional $500 billion in Medicare cuts for today’s seniors by 2023, “and an additional one trillion dollars in the decade after that,” in Obama’s own words.

http://www.912superseniors.org/2011/05/why-paul-ryans-medicare-is-so-much-better-than-obamas/

Bill Hedges of MO 3:56AM May 27, 2011

One of the big issues in the NY 26 district is that General Electric paid no American taxes in 2010. The Democrat Hochul won over the very conservative middle class voters there with this message and it worked.

'Revenue neutral' is Republicanese for 'don't raise taxes', but the public is rejecting Ryan's Bill to make 'Tax Cuts for the Rich' permanent. Ryan and the Republicans are trying to balance the budget by killing Medicare for retired middle-class voters while making permanent the tax cuts for the rich and big oil companies.

'Revenue neutral' is a gimmick that nobody is buying anymore.

Folks are just getting fed up with subsidies for oil companies, the endless loopholes that let corporations and the rich to pay no taxes. In practice we have the lowest corporate tax rates anywhere considering many corporations pay no taxes at all, like GE and BP.

“The fact that every taxpayer in the 26th District paid more in taxes last year than General Electric is plain wrong. It’s time we overhaul our tax code. Without many of their tax breaks, G.E. would currently have thousands and thousands of more jobs here in the U.S. So we must end the tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas and instead invest in local businesses that create jobs for hard working American families,” Hochul said. "We can balance the budget the right way and not on the backs of our seniors.

Forget revenue neutral, taxes are the main deal that needs reform and we need to raise taxes on oil companies and the rich, while getting rid of all the tax loopholes that let some get away without paying any taxes at all.

Washington DC is screwed up because anyone who can afford lobbyists doesn't pay taxes, and that's what we need to fix - to get some to pay for their fair share.

Lisa of MD 11:08PM May 26, 2011

Gee, what a surprise !!!!

Worse recession had NOTHING to do with THAT !!!! Should be highest ever right !!!!

Bill Hedges of MO 10:41PM May 25, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

advertisement