Should U.S. Stop Building Nuclear Plants After Japan Earthquake?

Should fears of a meltdown in Japan change U.S. nuclear energy policy?

March 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (43)

A nuclear power plant in Japan suffered one explosion on Saturday and a second this morning as a result of last Friday’s record 8.9-magnitude quake. Fears of a nuclear meltdown come on the heels of the devastation the quake and resulting tsunami brought to the island nation, leaving at least 10,000 dead. More than 200,000 residents living in the area surrounding the plant have been evacuated. Like most structures in Japan, the nuclear plants were built to survive the earthquakes that frequently hit there, but Friday’s seismic rumble was the largest on record in Japan. By comparison, Haiti’s 2010 earthquake measured 7 on the Richter scale, and the infamous 1906 quake that destroyed much of the San Francisco area measured around 8.

Japan’s disaster leaves many asking: Could it happen here? The United States has more than 100 nuclear power generators, and, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s website, “nearly 3 million Americans live within 10 miles of an operating nuclear power plant.” President Obama, as well as other Democrats and Republicans, have pushed expansion of nuclear power in the United States as a way to ease dependence on foreign oil while creating new jobs. [Read the U.S. News debate: Does the United States Need More Nuclear Power?]

Independent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman believes it’s time for the United States to put a moratorium on building new plants. "We don't know where it's going with regard to the nuclear power plants in Japan right now, and I think it calls on us here in the U.S., naturally, not to stop building nuclear power plants, but to put the brakes on right now until we understand the ramifications of what's happened in Japan," he said on CBS’s Face the Nation. He added that he is a strong supporter of nuclear power since “it’s domestic, it’s ours, and it’s clean,” and because the country has had a “good safety record.”

But Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News Sunday that he doesn’t think “right after a major environmental catastrophe is a very good time to be making American domestic policy,” he said. “This discussion reminds me, somewhat, of the conversations that were going on after the BP oil spill last year.”

Still others believe this is a wake-up call for the world to pursue safe and greener sources of energy.

What do you think? Should the United States temporarily put the brakes on building new nuclear power plants? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Should the United States temporarily put the brakes on building new nuclear power plants?

View Results

Previously: How should the U.S. government respond to Japan’s earthquake and tsunami?

Tags:
nuclear power,
Joe Lieberman,
energy policy and climate change,
Mitch McConnell,
Congress,
Japan,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (43)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We should stop permanently. We need to get off nuclear power because their is a better alternative called renewable energy. We have the technology right now to run on renewable energy which is much better for the environment then nuclear energy. We should dump the money being used to build power plants into renewable energy so that by the time those power plants would have been built, we will have green energy in it's place. Nuclear may be easier but should we let our laziness get in the way of a better future? If we put the money into renewable instead of nuclear, we could create a better future for ourselves, future generations, and our planet. Who else agrees?!

Max of VA 6:14PM May 19, 2012

The votes are in- take a look! 51% of us want to either stop building nuclear power plants temporarily or permanently!

We need to move to greener energy! Why can't we change?????

Germany and some other countries have already done it.

Lets get moving!

cherie of OH 8:48PM August 02, 2011

Windturbines only kill birds, radiation kill everything. Dont build more nuclear power plants.. unless your tearing down a old one.. use different energy then nuclear whatever the cause, it will kill man kind in the form of a bomb or the form of "power".

derek of MA 1:59AM May 01, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

advertisement