Why Congress Should Ban High-Volume Ammo Clips

Large-capacity magazines can turn guns into weapons of mass destruction.

February 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (87)

Michael Nutter is mayor of Philadelphia and the second vice president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

Since Congress allowed the federal assault weapons ban to lapse in 2004, we've seen tragedy after tragedy as deranged killers unleashed deadly firepower, murdering dozens of innocents.

At Fort Hood, Texas, on the campus of Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, and at a workplace shooting in Manchester, Conn., the killers all had weapons with large-capacity magazines. And then came Tucson last month. A 9-year-old girl and a federal judge were among six people killed. Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was among the 13 injured. [Photos from the aftermath of the Giffords shooting.]

We as a society will always confront evil in the heart and sickness in the mind. Bad people will do bad things, but we can and must take steps to deny these criminals the weapons of mass destruction that have ripped apart families across the country. While the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that Americans have a right to keep a gun in the home for self-defense, the court has also upheld laws prohibiting possession of guns by felons or the mentally ill.

President Obama has called for "common sense" regulation. Regulating magazine size is surely common sense. Large-capacity magazines can turn a semiautomatic pistol into a weapon of mass destruction, with some spitting out six shots per second. These are not a hunter's weapons. They are meant to hurt or kill as many people as quickly as possible. Only law enforcement and the military should have access to this kind of firepower. [See which members of Congress get the most in campaign contributions from gun rights groups.]

In the wake of the Tucson tragedy, where the gunman used a 33-round magazine, New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, whose husband was killed and son seriously wounded in the terrible assault on the Long Island Rail Road in 1993, introduced legislation that would prohibit the transfer or possession of new large-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. This bill will not solve our nation's gun violence problems, but it will help, and in the long run, it will save lives. The U.S. Conference of Mayors strongly supports this bill and New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg's sponsorship of similar legislation in the Senate. [Take the U.S. News poll: should more Congressman carry guns for protection?]

Since May 2006, eight Philadelphia police officers have been killed in the line of duty, six by gunfire. One, Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski, was felled by an assault weapon. Across the state in Pittsburgh, three police officers were killed in April 2009 by a man armed with an assault rifle and two other guns. In an urban environment, weapons fitted out with large-capacity magazines are in fact weapons of mass destruction.

Some will argue that the magazines are used in sporting competitions or are necessary for defensive purposes at home. The plain truth is that a magazine with 10 bullets, which the McCarthy bill would allow, is more firepower than our Founding Fathers might have imagined and more than enough to guard one's castle.

Beyond halting the ever-increasing arms buildup by bringing common sense back to our regulation of these large-capacity magazines, the U.S. Conference of Mayors has called on Congress to fund fully the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS. Mentally ill people such as the gunman at Virginia Tech or the drug-abusing defendant in the Tucson massacre should not have been able to purchase weapons. [Read more about gun control and gun rights.]

The Mayors Against Illegal Guns group, of which I'm a member, has called for a fully funded NICS to help states cover the costs of gathering records. And we need to clarify the definition of mentally ill people so that individuals like the alleged Tucson shooter, who was too sick to gain readmission to school but was able to buy a gun, can be stopped.

Read NRA executive director for legislative action Chris Cox on why high-volume ammo clips should not be banned.

Should Congress ban high-volume ammo clips?

View Results

.

Tags:
Frank Lautenberg,
Carolyn McCarthy,
gun control and gun rights,
Congress,
Gabrielle Giffords,
national security terrorism and the military

Reader Comments Read all comments (87)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

So people that break the law to kill people are going to follow the law the says they can't have a rifle with a big magazine? If you want to sit in your inside your "castle" limited to 10 rounds per mag you will easily be overun by those that are already breaking the law to attack you and are not limiting themselves to 10 rounds per mag. The law breaks do not have any regards for weapons bans or restrictions if a villians wants some and it is illegal they will steal it or get it on a black market transaction. In the mean time most firearm laws and regulation for the restriction of firearms to the US public only degrade the law abiding citizens ability to defend themselves against law breaking citizens.

example 1 :

assume legal mag limit is 10rnds

law abiding citizen in armed with his 10rnds vs law breaking citizen armed with 100rnds.

I think its pretty easy to see that the odds are stacked agianst the law abiding citizen 10 fold.

example 2:

location restricts carrying firearms on site.

Law abiding citizen stores their firearm and does not take it to the restricted location vs law breaking citizen that brings a his same 100rnds firearm.

In this scenario the odds are near 0 to 100. Those are not odds that I like.

Making any part of the firearm segment illegal would stop the law breaking citizens from legally buying firearms, it would not stop them from illegally buying the same firearm or supplies. The thing about villians is that they lie cheat and steal.

How often do these tragedies occur where it is illegal to be carrying a firearm? Is it possible the the villians are smart enough to know that if they carry out an act at a place it is illegal be caring a firearm that all the law abiding citizens will be unarmed and unable to protect themselves?

RDTPHD of IN 1:45PM July 31, 2012

Last time I checked, pistols were for defensive purposes. Hi volume ammo clips turn a pistol into an offensive piece of equipment.

Heather of SC of SC 9:01PM May 02, 2011

Forget about whether or not there should be a ban on high-capacity ammunition containers. The real issue is the fact that some gun owners still fear that so-called "gun prohibitionists" and "total gun ban Democrats" want a 100-percent ban on private gun use and ownership, even though the Supreme Court in 2008 already has stated there cannot be a total gun ban.

Even though it is logical to assume there are no longer any serious "gun prohibitionists" or "total gun ban Democrats", some gun owners will still vote Republican because of a stereotype/myth/exaggerated notion.

There is no such thing in today's United States a total-gun-ban advocate (lesser forms of firearms regulation is a different story, of course).

Myth #1: the Obama Administration is 100 percent against gun ownership.

Fact: See above about the Supreme Court.

Myth #2: the Democratic Party favors a total gun ban.

Fact: The DEmocratic Party platform has NEVER mentioned a total ban.

Myth #3: Most Democrats in Congress support a total gun ban.

Fact: Very few congressional Democrats have ever called for a total ban.

Myth #4: Pro-gun Americans who fear a total gun ban are just being sane and rational.

Fact: Anyone who fears a total ban after what the Supreme Court stated in DC v. Heller is a crazy, kook, or paranoid fearmonger.

JVJ of MD 7:33AM March 09, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

advertisement