Why Congress Should Ban High-Volume Ammo Clips

Large-capacity magazines can turn guns into weapons of mass destruction.

February 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Michael Nutter is mayor of Philadelphia and the second vice president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

Since Congress allowed the federal assault weapons ban to lapse in 2004, we've seen tragedy after tragedy as deranged killers unleashed deadly firepower, murdering dozens of innocents.

At Fort Hood, Texas, on the campus of Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, and at a workplace shooting in Manchester, Conn., the killers all had weapons with large-capacity magazines. And then came Tucson last month. A 9-year-old girl and a federal judge were among six people killed. Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was among the 13 injured. [Photos from the aftermath of the Giffords shooting.]

We as a society will always confront evil in the heart and sickness in the mind. Bad people will do bad things, but we can and must take steps to deny these criminals the weapons of mass destruction that have ripped apart families across the country. While the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that Americans have a right to keep a gun in the home for self-defense, the court has also upheld laws prohibiting possession of guns by felons or the mentally ill.

President Obama has called for "common sense" regulation. Regulating magazine size is surely common sense. Large-capacity magazines can turn a semiautomatic pistol into a weapon of mass destruction, with some spitting out six shots per second. These are not a hunter's weapons. They are meant to hurt or kill as many people as quickly as possible. Only law enforcement and the military should have access to this kind of firepower. [See which members of Congress get the most in campaign contributions from gun rights groups.]

In the wake of the Tucson tragedy, where the gunman used a 33-round magazine, New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, whose husband was killed and son seriously wounded in the terrible assault on the Long Island Rail Road in 1993, introduced legislation that would prohibit the transfer or possession of new large-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. This bill will not solve our nation's gun violence problems, but it will help, and in the long run, it will save lives. The U.S. Conference of Mayors strongly supports this bill and New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg's sponsorship of similar legislation in the Senate. [Take the U.S. News poll: should more Congressman carry guns for protection?]

Since May 2006, eight Philadelphia police officers have been killed in the line of duty, six by gunfire. One, Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski, was felled by an assault weapon. Across the state in Pittsburgh, three police officers were killed in April 2009 by a man armed with an assault rifle and two other guns. In an urban environment, weapons fitted out with large-capacity magazines are in fact weapons of mass destruction.

Some will argue that the magazines are used in sporting competitions or are necessary for defensive purposes at home. The plain truth is that a magazine with 10 bullets, which the McCarthy bill would allow, is more firepower than our Founding Fathers might have imagined and more than enough to guard one's castle.

Beyond halting the ever-increasing arms buildup by bringing common sense back to our regulation of these large-capacity magazines, the U.S. Conference of Mayors has called on Congress to fund fully the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS. Mentally ill people such as the gunman at Virginia Tech or the drug-abusing defendant in the Tucson massacre should not have been able to purchase weapons. [Read more about gun control and gun rights.]

The Mayors Against Illegal Guns group, of which I'm a member, has called for a fully funded NICS to help states cover the costs of gathering records. And we need to clarify the definition of mentally ill people so that individuals like the alleged Tucson shooter, who was too sick to gain readmission to school but was able to buy a gun, can be stopped.

Read NRA executive director for legislative action Chris Cox on why high-volume ammo clips should not be banned.

Should Congress ban high-volume ammo clips?

View Results

.

Tags:
Frank Lautenberg,
Carolyn McCarthy,
Congress,
national security terrorism and the military,
gun control and gun rights,
Gabrielle Giffords

Reader Comments Read all comments (86)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Last time I checked, pistols were for defensive purposes. Hi volume ammo clips turn a pistol into an offensive piece of equipment.

Heather of SC of SC 9:01PM May 02, 2011

Forget about whether or not there should be a ban on high-capacity ammunition containers. The real issue is the fact that some gun owners still fear that so-called "gun prohibitionists" and "total gun ban Democrats" want a 100-percent ban on private gun use and ownership, even though the Supreme Court in 2008 already has stated there cannot be a total gun ban.

Even though it is logical to assume there are no longer any serious "gun prohibitionists" or "total gun ban Democrats", some gun owners will still vote Republican because of a stereotype/myth/exaggerated notion.

There is no such thing in today's United States a total-gun-ban advocate (lesser forms of firearms regulation is a different story, of course).

Myth #1: the Obama Administration is 100 percent against gun ownership.

Fact: See above about the Supreme Court.

Myth #2: the Democratic Party favors a total gun ban.

Fact: The DEmocratic Party platform has NEVER mentioned a total ban.

Myth #3: Most Democrats in Congress support a total gun ban.

Fact: Very few congressional Democrats have ever called for a total ban.

Myth #4: Pro-gun Americans who fear a total gun ban are just being sane and rational.

Fact: Anyone who fears a total ban after what the Supreme Court stated in DC v. Heller is a crazy, kook, or paranoid fearmonger.

JVJ of MD 7:33AM March 09, 2011

Hi-Cap mags are either for rich boys or idiots. The price of ammo is so far out there that a huge mag is a waste, for sport shooting, relax and enjoy your day shooting and reflect on your previous 5-8 shot string, for home defense, if you need 30 bullets in a pistol, bud you should of just bought a shotgun.

Mike Pine of RI 3:58PM February 25, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama Flops Against 'Uncommitted' in Arkansas, Kentucky Primaries

Obama stands to lose voters in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia due to his coal regulations.

Mitt Romney Brought Bain Capital Criticisms on Himself

Romney might be a fixer, but he isn't a job creator.

Mitt Romney's Bain History Deserves Scrutiny

Voters deserve to know about Romney's work history before they hire him for the job as president.

Mitt Romney Can’t Afford to Lose Obama's Bain Game

Romney needs to showcase the jobs he created at Bain and why Obama can't fix the economy.

Rutgers Bullying Case About Gay Rights, Privacy

The Ravi-Clementi case raises the deeper issues equal rights for gays and the right to privacy.

The House of Representatives Is the Scariest Circus on Earth

There's a new circus in town, and it's called the House of Representatives.

Obama Discovers Lobbyists Are Hard to Get Rid Of

Lobbying is a constitutionally protected activity and lobbyists have become a permanent part of the Washington policy process.

Obama Catholic Contraception Fight Isn't Over As Church Sues

The "evolution" in Obama's thinking on the issue of religious freedom is disappointing.

advertisement