The Evolving Biography and Myths of George Washington

The cherry tree to the wooden teeth to his relationship with Martha--the myths of the founding father

February 10, 2011 RSS Feed Print

George Washington's death in December 1799 left Americans feeling "orphaned" and yearning for confirmation that their founding father would continue to guide them, says Edward Lengel, editor in chief of the Papers of George Washington project at the University of Virginia. To maintain and even enhance Washington's legacy, those close to him wrote extensive biographies that portrayed him as a perfect, almost godlike figure in American history. In the centuries since, Americans have remade the founding father's image to support their political, religious, and social ideals. These efforts gave birth to waves of falsehood, Lengel argues in Inventing George Washington: America's Founder, in Myth and Memory. He recently spoke with U.S. News about how the image of Washington extends far beyond the myth of the "cherry tree and wooden teeth." Excerpts:

Explain the difference between the private and the public Washington.

Wherever he went, he moved as if he was an actor on a stage and everybody was watching him. He was aware that everything he did was going to be measured and evaluated. As a result of that, he really pushed down his strong feelings, his passions, his emotions, his ideals. I think he only shared them with one person, and that was Martha.

Was he always like that?

In his younger years, he was much more openly emotional and much more outspoken. But he learned as he grew older, in his 20s and his 30s, that he had to control himself, and self-control and willpower were dominating factors of his personality.

[See a slide show of the 10 youngest presidents.]

What are some of the common myths about Washington?

There's a myth that he didn't get along with Martha at all, that Martha was ugly and cranky and stupid, and that Washington sought solace in the arms of other women after he was married. That's a myth that's only recently been exploded to show that they did love each other deeply. There are many modern myths about Washington's supposed political beliefs or religious belief. When people feel that they are in a political fight, they need to have Washington on their side. People across the political spectrum and across the religious spectrum have concocted myths about Washington to say that he was either conservative or liberal, or that he was an evangelical Christian or even an atheist.

What myth is the most surprising to you?

Myths that he smoked marijuana, which is completely ridiculous. Myths that he consorted with space aliens or that his ghost flits around the countryside or haunts historic houses. And even the myth that he supposedly had a child with a slave, which, in my opinion, is on the same spectrum of ridiculousness because there's absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

How did these myths come about?

They start with the passionate desire that Americans have had since Washington died, to know him . . . to feel that they can shake hands with him, look him in the eye.

Have any of these myths damaged his legacy?

Yes. I still hear people asking whether he died of syphilis. All of these fit into a new mythology created in the 1920s that tries to take Washington down, tries to portray him as a rake, scoundrel, and fool who only succeeded by accident. But I also think the modern mythmaking is damaging because it twists Washington into somebody he was not. It prevents us from really seeing his true example for the nation.

[See a slide show of the 10 worst presidents.]

How will we continue to "invent Washington?"

I'm hopeful that with all the Washington papers being out there free to the public online . . . we will have grounding of the real Washington. It hopefully will be more difficult to twist or manipulate him. But I'm not foolish enough to believe the storytelling will end.

What can President Obama learn from Washington?

One of the things we don't realize about Washington is that he was a very idealistic man. He was somebody who had very strong and firm personal, moral, and political principles, and he stuck to them. But he had enough realism to understand that sometimes you have to adjust your path to achieve what you want. Not exactly compromise, but take a realistic account of people and things as they actually are.

What are the similarities between the two presidents?

They have the same type of gravitas that can be a very positive thing. It means at a time of crisis that you watch your words carefully, but at the same time, it can make them a little bit hard to understand. [Washington] was a great judge of his audience; he had great perception of what people were thinking as they observed him, and he had just the sense of how to make the right dramatic gesture or the right word at the right moment.

What did you learn from writing this book?

Americans need Washington. We want so much to believe that [he] was just like us that we are willing to do anything.

Tags:
George Washington

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

George Washington grew Hemp. In his Journals at the library of Congress. He also grew many other type of crops, but believed in crop rotation and, yes the man grew hemp.

Clif Deruvall of TX 5:15PM February 21, 2011

In Washington's diary from August 7, 1765, he writes, "Began to separate the Male from the Female hemp … rather too late."

George Washington was growing Hemp, AKA: Marijuana. There is NO reason to "separate" the male and female hemp plants in the production of rope, canvas or any of the other thousands of products Hemp was used for during the colonial era. The only reason Washington would have been separating the males and females is to reproduce the Indian (think India) drug varieties, and he no doubt did this as to be able to make any of the many pharmaceutical remedies that utilized Cannabis at that time, if you don't think so, look it up in any pharmacopoeia.

Considering that tobacco smoking was a favorite pastime of the colonialists, I do not think it's much of a stretch of the imagination to consider that they were also smoking the Indian hemp they were growing.

Todd McCormick of CA 1:04PM February 21, 2011

More myths, more bad history.....

See the following film that incorrectly depicts George Washington discussing politics with his slave Billy Lee and includes incorrect historical info from the Director of Gunston Hall about George Mason and the Constitution.

Fractured Union film: www.fcps.edu/fairfaxnetwork/mount_vernon/fractured_union/index.html

Director of Gunston Hall commits major faux pas; incorrectly states the Virginia Constitutional Delegation supported the Bill of Rights. George Mason and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts were the two delegates that made a motion to add a bill of rights at the Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. The motion was turned down unanimously.

Partial transcript

Jack Warren, Executive Director, Society of the Cincinnati: “Madison convinced him [George Washington] that the republic itself would crumble if the Articles of Confederation weren’t substantially revised and Washington felt compelled to protect the republic even at the sacrifice of his reputation.”

Peter Henriques, Associate Professor Emeritus, George Mason University: “The fact that he [George Washington] is going to go makes it a tremendously important meeting and if he’s going to be there, then others want to go and it takes on prominence that it would not have.”

Stuart Leibiger, Chair, History Department, La Salle University: “People arrived in Philadelphia with different ideas of exactly what would happen and it is only as the debates at Philadelphia unfolded, I think, it became clear, that they would really be overthrowing or scrapping the Articles of Confederation entirely.”

David Reese, Director, Gunston Hall Plantation: “The Virginia Delegation at the Convention were in agreement that when it was time for the states to ratify the new constitution, they would ask for a bill of rights and they had already agreed to that. That was not enough for Mason. He did not want to empower a new government that did not guarantee the rights of every individual.”

Next scene: Colonel George Mason and James Madison in Philadelphia discussing Mason’s refusal to sign the Constitution, September 1787. Mason is 62 and Madison is 36.

BM of VA 1:27PM February 11, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

Mitt Romney Should Put Up or Shut Up on Syria

The Republican candidate has proven he doesn't have the foreign policy credentials necessary to be president.

Mitt Romney's Colorado Disconnect

The presumptive GOP nominee seems unwilling or unable to talk about local issues in a swing state he desperately needs to win.

Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

Obama Must Do More to Protect the Intellectual Property Industry

The Obama administration needs to protect the industry's creativity and innovation.

advertisement