Should the Government Fund High-Speed Rail?

February 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (26)

Yesterday, Vice President Joe Biden announced the White House plan to invest $53 billion over the next six years into a high-speed passenger rail network, including $8 billion in the coming fiscal year. The proposed plan would be a step toward providing high-speed rail access to 80 percent of Americans within 25 years, a goal President Obama laid out in his State of the Union address last month. The funds—part of the president’s budget he will send to Congress next week—would develop new and improve existing rail corridors. “There are key places where we cannot afford to sacrifice as a nation—one of which is infrastructure,” Biden told a crowd at Philadelphia’s busy 30th Street train station, arguing the investment is part of winning the future. “If we sit back, a lot of other folks are going to eat our lunch,” he said. [Read Little Rock, Ark., Mayor Hays's Editorial: High Speed Rail is Key to Economic Development.]

The federal government has historically funded or subsidized infrastructure projects like highways and rail lines since they are public goods, used by many and aimed at contributing to the country’s overall economic growth.

But some members of Congress are already protesting, saying the government isn’t the best entity to pursue rail improvements. “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, and that is exactly what Vice President Biden offered,” said Rep. Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican and chair of the Transportation Committee’s railroads subcommittee. “Government won’t develop American high-speed rail. Private investment and a competitive market will.”

What do you think? Should the government fund development of high-speed rail? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Should the government fund development of high-speed rail?

View Results

Previously: Was Bill O’Reilly’s “people hate you” question to Obama appropriate?

Tags:
State of the Union,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Joe Biden,
Barack Obama,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How can we even consider such a thing as High Speed Rail? Consider what we pay and what we get from AmTrak. Those trains were built in more affordable times, and they are still a major annual cost to us. There are so many less expensive, more important to all of us problems, like interest payments on the national debt. 80%, really, think about how we are spread out we are in this country. High Speed Rail that really serves 80% would cost us more than we can borrow. No one has that kind of money. If it were really do-able, it would still not fair to the 20% that pay so much to get nothing.

ESHarz of NJ 10:09AM April 20, 2011

How can we even consider such a thing as High Speed Rail? There are so many less expensive, more important to all of us problems, like interest payments on the national debt. High Speed Rail that really serves 80% will cost us more than we can borrow. If it were really do-able, it is still not fair to the 20% that pay so much to get nothing.

ESHarz of NJ 9:56AM April 20, 2011

The united states, once considered the most powerful,the most progressive,

the most admired nation in the world...

What made this nation so great? american people with there work ethics,

and labor unions helped to gave all of us decent wages and retirement benefits.

Today there are no jobs, inflation is killing all of us, due to the greed of super

wealthy industrialists , oil corporations never had it so good..

I think the time is right, to invest in 200 mile per hour trains, traveling all over

America , High air fares limits our ability to travel, ,high gas prices wont help either..

Super fast trains are the answer to our unemployment, thousands of workers

in the construction trades will be able to earn there daily breadl

LETS DO IT!!!!.

.

.

VICTOR SINDONI of FL 10:44PM March 29, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement