Why Congress Should Repeal and Replace the Healthcare Reform Law

Obamacare law will cost jobs and bust budgets, writes House Ways & Means Chairman Dave Camp

February 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

Dave Camp, Republican from Michigan, is chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee.

The American people know that when a tree is rotten at the center, you cut it down and plant something new in its place.

Congress began that process last week when the House cast two critical, bipartisan healthcare votes. In one vote, we cut down a rotten tree, voting to repeal the law. Then we cast a second vote to replace it, planting the seeds to grow solutions that ensure all Americans have access to quality, affordable healthcare—regardless of their health condition.

Repealing and replacing the healthcare law is about protecting Americans' health security, making care and coverage more affordable, and taking action so that people don't lose the coverage they have. Everybody agrees that healthcare costs are too high. Everybody also agrees that we need to protect those who are sick and need coverage the most. But when it comes to solutions, the paths diverge. [See a slide show of 10 ways Republicans can take down Obamacare.]

The problem with the Democrats' law is that it puts government—not doctors and patients—at the center of healthcare decisions. Instead of families deciding what coverage is best for them, unelected government officials do so. Instead of families and employers deciding how much they can afford, the IRS makes that decision. And, instead of families and employers deciding if they need health insurance, the government mandates that they buy it even if they can't afford it. [Read Peter Roff: Federal Judge Declares Obamacare Unconstitutional.]

At its core, this law is all about the government. It is financed through new taxes, fees, and mandates—many of which will hit middle-class families and the small businesses that we're depending on to help move our anemic economy forward. It drives state budgets to the brink by pushing 15 million additional people onto Medicaid at a time when states can't afford their current programs. Worst of all, it increases, rather than decreases, insurance costs for millions of Americans.

Entitlement expansion is not healthcare reform; and letting the IRS hire up to 16,500 new auditors, agents, and other employees to implement and enforce this law is not the same as empowering doctors and patients. [See photos of the healthcare debate.]

Repealing the healthcare law is the first step, but not the last. Reform is critical to increasing affordability and coverage. Some ideas have already been proposed. One, which I offered as an alternative to the current law, lowers premiums for millions of families by $3,200 compared to the increases expected under the new law. That approach would also help curtail the junk lawsuits that drive up medical costs, give people more choices by allowing them to shop for insurance across state lines, and provide states the flexibility to make changes that best meet the needs of their residents and small businesses. And, importantly, the proposal also includes vital protections providing people with pre-existing conditions access to affordable coverage, prohibiting insurers from unjustly canceling policies, and allowing dependents to remain on their parents' policies. [See editorial cartoons about the healthcare law.]

There will be other ideas, too. But they won't be developed behind closed doors by Washington politicians who think they know what's best for you and your family. The solutions we intend to bring forward will be developed with the American people, with small business owners, and with large employers. That is the way laws are supposed to be written—with the direct input of those who will be affected.

We can reform healthcare, provide better patient protections, and lower costs. It doesn't take $1 trillion in new government spending, $500 billion in new taxes, and $500 billion in cuts to Medicare. It takes some common-sense reforms. Working together, we can deliver that kind of reform to our families, businesses, and seniors.

Read Assistant House Democratic Leader James Clyburn on why the healthcare law should not be repealed.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
James Clyburn,
Congress,
Republican Party,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This post could not be more factual.

cheap nike max of AL 7:16AM December 05, 2011

The private sector is far better at most endeavors than government but clearly NOT ALL. There are areas where the unfettered single minded pursuit of profit without regard for consequences to others is a detriment to society. It would be fine if doctors and patients were really the decision drivers as suggested in the article but this is a delusion. The real control rests primarily with the health insurance, pharmaceutical and food industries. None of these, though they will deny it, have the best interests of patients at heart. From a moral standpoint, the existence of pre-existing condition exclusionary practices is a high crime second only to war and genocide. As such, it should meet its immediate and unlamented death - not only with regards to mandatory waiting periods but also as it affects eligibility for coverage.

Jacques of CA 7:06PM November 29, 2011

An all around well written article..

specialiste referencement of AL 5:44PM October 22, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement