School Choice Is the Most Critical Civil Rights Issue of Our Time

Without school choice we risk creating a permanent economic underclass of uneducated, unemployed Americans

February 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Michelle D. Bernard is the president and CEO of the Bernard Center for Women, Politics & Public Policy and an MSNBC political analyst.

Remember those commercials in which people would be blindfolded and asked to try a product and then say which one they thought tasted the best? Inevitably, the people in the commercials would taste the bargain item and say they liked it better than the fancy stuff, thus proving that it doesn't have to be expensive or elite to be good.

I would like to take this opportunity to invite our leaders to put on a blindfold, taste this issue and tell me does it really matter whether it's liberal or conservative.

First, it gives parents the right to choose what's best for their child.

Second, it ensures the possibility of achieving the American dream by giving all children the same chance at a bright, productive, and prosperous future.

Third, it promotes inclusion, integration and tolerance.

It is the most critical civil rights issue of our time, an extension of Brown v. Board of Education, only today, at issue is the egregious separation of students from poor neighborhoods from students in wealthy neighborhoods.

The issue of which I speak is school choice, and I think you'll be surprised to learn that, when we get down to the facts, Americans of every stripe imaginable can agree: choice is a good thing.

[See a round up of the month's best editorial cartoons.]

All of us want the best education possible for our children. Some of us have the means to live in neighborhoods with exceptional public schools. But so many Americans do not. According to the U.S. Department of Education, as of 2008 more than 1700 "dropout factories"--or high schools in which less than 60 percent of students graduate--exist. The students who drop out are overwhelmingly African-American and Latino. They are trapped in schools that, from early in their education, keep moving them from grade to grade without giving them the skills and knowledge necessary to become successful adults.

In his State of the Union address, President Obama reminded Americans that education begins at home and that it's a parent's responsibility to instill a love of learning in their children as well as making sure "the TV is turned off and homework gets done." This is absolutely true, but a parents' ability to influence his or her child's education cannot stop in the home.

As a nation, we have a moral obligation to make sure that all parents have the legal right to put their children in the school that believes that all children can learn and has a proven track record helping children thrive. If we don't do this, we risk creating a permanent underclass of uneducated, unemployable Americans. This would be the end of American exceptionalism.

[See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

It is for this reason that I joined a coalition of more than 150 organizations from the right, from the left, and in the center, to spotlight last month's National School Choice Week. We are shining a spotlight on this issue and reaching out to communities across the country to teach them how to advocate for the future of every child. The week was only the beginning though. We will continue to espouse the critical need for parents to have educational options for their children.

This is not a Republican issue or a Democratic issue, it's an American issue, and, quite possibly, the only bipartisan issue we have left.

If individuals and groups from across the ideological spectrum can come together for this cause, don't you think our politicians should be able to put politics aside, put that blindfold on, and taste what's best for America's children as well?

Tags:
State of the Union,
Democratic Party,
Barack Obama,
education,
Republican Party,
civil rights,
K-12 education

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I agree with your comments, Lynn. What's left out are the taxes, the busing system and the sense of community. In addition, you are not thinking about the children who are living in those towns in all your 'fairness' political talk.

Kris of NH 1:18PM January 22, 2013

I believe you have failed to point out the potential issues of school of choice. First, it doesn't address the real issue. The fact that there are schools that any child has to go to, regardless of race, family income, etc. that is failing the students so miserably is the true problem. School of choice only changes the population of who attends the "good" schools so that it is more evenly distributed. The real problem is that the public school system is failing, it needs to be fixed for all students.

Also, there are benefits to a sense of community, a "neighborhood school". We should be focused on fixing our schools for all of our children, rather than worrying about who gets to go to the good schools. I want my child to know his neighbors, I want all the children in his neighborhood, and any other neighborhood to have a place to go to learn about academics, life, people, in a safe place, with all the opportunity every child deserves. I want my child to know what it means to have a sense of place and community and belonging. Those are important lessons.

School of choice is sort of like the western medicine approach to health. We're trying to solve the problem by treating the symptoms, not the underlying cause. Let's fix our public school system, so children can go to their neighborhood school, and get a good education, no matter where they live.

Lynn of CO 12:29AM March 02, 2012

...anger me more than government intransigence on this issue, whether state or federal. If I had my way, federal funds for education would not be available to states that did not provide full, 100% vouchers for all citizens (not just the poor, who disproportionately benefit from universal vouchers anyway).

Of course, if I had my way, officials who oppose vouchers would have their brains emptied, and they'd be forced to attend schools whose results rank in the lowest quartile -- while everyone else gets vouchers.

rasqual of IL 6:10PM April 08, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

advertisement