Was President Obama’s State of the Union Speech a Success?

January 26, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Last night, stepping back from a stark economic backdrop, deficit fears, and partisan budget arguments, President Obama called Americans to look forward with hope and issued a challenge to invest in our country’s international competitiveness. Without using the current catch-phrase “exceptionalism,” Obama's address focused on the country’s track record of greatness and its potential to lead in innovation. “What we can do—what America does better than anyone else—is spark the creativity and imagination of our people,” the president said. “We’re the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook.” But he pointed out that this will not come without effort, saying we need to invest in innovation and education and to “take responsibility for our deficit and reform our government.”

The speech was more thematic than specific, with the president setting goals rather than laying out a step-by-step policy plan. Initially, that seems to be what viewers wanted. U.S. News blogger Robert Schlesinger points out, “The insta-returns are in and the president knocked the State of the Union out of the ballpark.” A CBS poll directly following the speech showed 91 percent of viewers approved of the proposals Obama made, while 9 percent disapproved. “No great surprises here,” Schlesinger writes. “The speech was well-delivered and seemed to be constructed not to pick partisan fights.”

But The Weekly Standard blogger Stephen F. Hayes disagrees. He found the State of the Union meaningless. “Overall, the speech was a lot like the Obama presidency: phony bipartisanship, too much spending, unconvincing rhetoric on fiscal restraint, and not enough attention to foreign policy and national security.” His fellow blogger Fred Barnes called Obama’s goal of “‘winning the future’ a fuzzy goal if there ever was one,” he wrote. “But how about winning the present?”

What do you think? Was President Obama’s State of the Union speech a success? Take the poll and post your thoughts below.

Was President Obama’s State of the Union speech a success?

View Results

Previously: Should Supreme Court justices attend the State of the Union address?

Tags:
Congress,
State of the Union,
Barack Obama,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (47)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Details on how to revitalize the economy was clearly stated, how to invest in the future of the younger generation is clearly stated,how create job now by global alliance is an excellent, and to cap it all, effort to keep American people together and to remain focus on the economy recovery gave a pass. I'm thrilled and i'm proud to be an American.

Bisiriyu Elujoba of NY 12:07AM February 02, 2011

Every innovation named by the President in his call for "investment" was by people who were NOT funded by the government. Edison, the Wright Brothers, every single historical reference was to private operations which led the way. Microsoft became successful long before it had any dealings with the government.

But the very biggest fraud of the entire speech was about the history of transcontental railways. Four separate groups attempted to complete rail systems traversing the North American Continent. Three, almost entirely subsidised by the U.S. Government, failed utterly and went bankrupt, requiring public (that means tax-money) bailouts just to settle debts, not to continue operating. Bonds were issued, during the middle of the Civil War, as de facto payment to the builders of what became the Union Pacific Overland Route. It was built on debt, just as Obama plans to do to us now. A separate construction was completely successful from start to finish, and was funded privately. Not only did the Great Northern Railway cover a great distance (the Union Pacific "transcontinental" line only went from Omaha to the West Coast), but was built with fewer disasters, fewer lives lost, and more quickly.

The President asks us to "invest", by which he means give the government more of our money, with which they will get less done. No thank you.

Freelancer of CA 7:25PM January 30, 2011

When the riff-raff is all worked up over another successful speech by Obama - you can be sure it was a big success. All the hatemongers are not looking out out the best interests of this country and all their wrath are bound for the dustbin of current opinion.

Eric of NJ 3:10PM January 30, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

Mitt Romney Should Put Up or Shut Up on Syria

The Republican candidate has proven he doesn't have the foreign policy credentials necessary to be president.

Mitt Romney's Colorado Disconnect

The presumptive GOP nominee seems unwilling or unable to talk about local issues in a swing state he desperately needs to win.

Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

Obama Must Do More to Protect the Intellectual Property Industry

The Obama administration needs to protect the industry's creativity and innovation.

advertisement