John Boehner, Sarah Palin, and When Crying Is OK in Politics

From Ed Muskie to Pat Schroeder to John Boehner

December 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

It was early 1989, and I was 25 and lucky enough to be among a crop of new White House staffers working for President George H.W. Bush. We got the word that the president wanted to see the communications team in the Roosevelt Room for lunch. I was nervously picking at my chicken salad when he told us, "Listen, I'm no Ronald Reagan. If I need a speech to meet the families at Dover"—the Delaware Air Force base where the bodies of fallen soldiers usually arrive—"don't give me a speech that's a '10.' I'll never make it through it. Give me a '5.' "

Bush—the World War II fighter pilot who ran 58 bombing runs—tears up very easily, and always has. That day, a little over a year after the infamous cover of Newsweek that called him a "wimp," he was warning us not to give him a speech that might risk a few tears. Speechwriters know that it's better to pull out all the stops on a sad occasion than to write a restrained, somewhat stilted eulogy. But we understood, and I can't think of a single occasion when Bush ever broke down in public as president (he only did years later, after leaving office.)

Ed Muskie was still alive the day of that luncheon, and he must have been on Bush's mind. When Muskie was a Democratic candidate for president back in 1972, the press reported that he'd been crying in the cold snows of New Hampshire. Muskie insisted they were snowflakes, not tears, on his cheeks but nevertheless withdrew from the race and effectively ended his career in politics. For the next 20 years, his example served as a warning to politicians: get verklempt and you'll be sorry.

But then along came Bill Clinton in 1992. Clinton was the first politician to successfully survive the quivering lip and red eyes, misting up several times as president. He was followed later by Bob Dole tearing up while talking about his World War II days in the 1996 presidential cycle. George W. Bush choked up after giving the Medal of Honor to a war hero, and Mitt Romney broke down while watching a soldier's casket go by during the 2008 primaries. Barack Obama wept openly when his grandmother died, and now incoming House Speaker John Boehner has been nothing short of sobbing, first on election night and later talking to Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes. His is a full-out bawl: face contorted, voice distorted, tears pouring. He has a hard time talking about the American dream and little children.

[See 2010: The Year in Cartoons.]

With Boehner, the tears seem authentic—no Broadcast News waterworks here—and in the end, he comes across as endearing. Stahl, who said she wanted to hold his hand while he was crying, reported that she asked him, "Do you try to control it?" And he said, "This is me, I am comfortable with who I am. Everybody who knows me well knows I cry and that's who I am." Asked whether there would be a public backlash against the airing of an interview so heavy on crying, Stahl responded, "I don't think the public is going to have a negative feeling about this at all. I do think public attitudes about crying have changed a lot." She's right: Rasmussen polls show Boehner's ratings at historic highs, with his favorability ratings far higher than Nancy Pelosi's were before she became speaker. And his ratings have continued to rise even since the election.

But as the song goes, it's different for girls. When Colorado Democratic Rep. Pat Schroeder announced the end of her candidacy for president in 1987, she sobbed. The reaction was swift and severe: She was hounded by both men and women for breaking down. "Guys have been tearing up all along and people think it's marvelous," Schroeder said in an interview years later, adding that she'd started a file on weeping male politicians. The file grew so large she eventually threw it out.

So women kept a stiff upper lip for the next 20 years. Then, in 2008, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton briefly got teary after a voter asked, "How do you do it?" Suddenly she seemed like a real person, one who didn't want to go down in defeat and who had drawn upon her inner reserves to keep going. With a boost of momentum, she won the New Hampshire primary and stayed in the race longer than most expected.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Patty Murray,
Congress,
John Boehner,
Nancy Pelosi,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Haberdashery of ID:

Wow! I see you are a fan of Wiki! There is a problem with this, however. Just about anyone who is registered with the Wikipedia Website can write an article for Wikipedia. Wikipedia's intention, I infer, is to eventually be able to tell the facts, but, presently, Wikipedia accepts the VIEWS of contributors that are not, necessarily, factual.

For this reason, it makes interesting reading, and some of the time, eventually, Wikipedia may finally come up with facts, but, according to the Website below (note this article is published right ON Wikipedia), we really can't argue with this primary source: "...Most importantly, when changes to an article (located on the Wikipedia site) are made, they become available immediately before undergoing any review, no matter if they contain an error, are somehow misguided, or even patent nonsense...." (See the Wikipedia Website citation below).

If you want to prove a point, you are still better off looking for the truth in original (primary) documents, recordings, videos, etc. If you, for instance, want to see the results of lawsuits won by Fox News, you can go directly to the court documents pertaining to the case. This is not easy to do as it takes a great deal of time beyond just looking up a topic. If you really want the facts, however, primary documents are the way to go.

By the way, you might want to look up Jane Akre vs. News Corporation (1998) and News Corporation vs. Jane Akre (2003) in the Tampa, Florida Courts system. I used to think Fox News told the truth on their nighttime news reporting (Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, etc.), until I read these two cases. Fox News is not obligated to present the truth, as truth in the media is not a requirement in the United States of America!

I, personally, want truth brought back to the media, as I don't know how any of us can make an intelligent decision about selecting political candidates without learning the truth. Apparently, most people don't really care one way or the other, according to recent polls.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Nature_of_Wikipedia

anna banana of MI 1:13AM January 11, 2011

Maryszka T of CA:

I am still anxiously awaiting your citations and primary documents that prove your statements.

anna banana of MI 12:42AM January 11, 2011

A drunk is all he is, and its why he puts on the tears, he is not choked up over anything more then his own vile for what he has become

sickened of MI 12:59PM January 04, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

advertisement