Obama, Democrats Must Worry About the Center, Not the Left

The party must focus on bipartisan efforts on jobs and unemployment

November 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (15)

Jim Matheson is a Democratic U.S. representative from Utah and the Blue Dog Coalition's cochair for communication.

Democrats got whupped on November 2, and anyone who says otherwise is on another planet. In House races, Republicans gained over 60 seats—the second-largest net gain in the chamber by either party since World War II. The carnage was especially severe among moderate-to-conservative members of my caucus, including at least 23 of my fellow Blue Dogs. Because Blue Dogs traditionally represent the most competitive districts, they are always vulnerable. Despite their best efforts, the tidal wave—which most of us knew was coming—swept them out to sea.

Such a steep loss cries out for shaking things up on my side of the aisle. If a CEO presided over such a poor performance, he or she would be shown the door. The same is true for a coach whose team flounders on the field. That is why I have joined many of my colleagues in calling for change—starting at the top, with a new minority leader.

[See photos from the campaign trail.]

A quick glance at the exit-polling data tells you why staying with the status quo would be madness. Across almost every voting demographic, Democratic candidates were rejected. Women voters, senior voters, high school and college graduate voters, suburban and rural voters, and most strikingly, independent voters sent a loud and clear message that jobs and the economy are what matters.

What they didn't say is that they are enamored of Republicans. Polls show neither party in Congress is very popular. In my own district, what I heard time after time on the campaign trail is that both parties are guilty of engaging in too much bickering and not enough problem solving. Because many moderate voices in the House are now gone, I fear one scenario is that the atmosphere will become even more polarized. But it doesn't have to turn out that way.

[See editorial cartoons about the Republicans.]

Some have argued that moderate Democrats are to blame for their own demise—that they disappointed the liberal base. But the numbers don't back up that theory. In 2006, self-described liberals comprised 20 percent of those exiting the polls; an identical 20 percent made up the 2010 electorate and 90 percent voted for Democrats. Meanwhile, for the first time since exit surveys began asking the ideology question in 1976, conservatives outnumbered moderates. In 2008, President Obama won 60 percent of moderates; Democrats—in 2010—attracted 55 percent.

If you look back on history, you'll see that moderates in both parties are critical to forging good public policy. Most of the signature pieces of legislation enacted in the 20th century—the Civil Rights Act, the Social Security Act, welfare reform—came about through the efforts of broad, bipartisan coalitions.

As we heed the voters' message and sharpen our focus on the economy and jobs, all sides have a willing partner in those of us who make up the "radical center." Compromise on tax cuts to create more certainty for families and small businesses, a fiscal blueprint that lowers deficits and moves toward balanced budgets, and a serious discussion about how to address the unsustainable path of excessive growth in healthcare costs are warranted. Other areas include tort reform, lasting incentives for research and development, and fewer layers of regulation.

[See a collection of editorial cartoons about the economy.]

The time-honored adage of "when you find yourself in a deep hole, the first rule is to stop digging" holds true not just for deficit hawks like the Blue Dogs. It also applies to a party that just had the earth move from under it almost everywhere. Before we reapply for our jobs, we must demonstrate that we listen to those doing the hiring.

Read why Democrats should fight for popular progressive policies by Cofounder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee Stephanie Taylor.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
social security,
Congress,
Republican Party,
healthcare reform,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
civil rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Upon taking office, Obama's agenda was a pledge to close Guantanamo w/in a year, prosecute war crimes, the Lilly Ledbetter Act, The Recovery Act, repealing DADT and Health care with the country on the brink of depression.

Nevertheless, his was a progressive agenda but w/in a week of taking office, the republicans hit the president with defiance delaying, stopping or compromising much of his legislation.

I was among those who wanted a 2X sized stimulus with no tax cuts. I am still reeling from the fact that no one was prosecuted for war crimes. My hopes were high for DADT when Obama met with HRC and above all, the health care bill was significantly weakened without single payer or public option.

His failures swung the pendulum right and was a catalyst for the Tea Party. For the next year and 1/2, the climate moved farther to right tightening republican opposition while fine tuning their conservative voice. The possibility for bipartisanship faded.

For his own part, Obama did let progressives down because he was too eager to compromise and such a poor negotiator.

So, my conclusion is that his agenda was progressive but his leadership failings, destructive republican behavior and an economy in dire straights killed the progressive chance was asked for in 2008.

(Denis Kucinich anyone?)

Todd Armstrong of CA 11:58PM December 05, 2010

Mr. Matheson says that sticking with the status quo is madness, and I couldn't agree more. But the status quo for Democrats has been to move to the right and lick the boot heel of corporations. There has been nothing bold or progressive about the Dems over the past few years. They have alienated their base, which is the real reason they have lost.

You're right, Mr. Matheson, the status quo has got to go, so see you later, Jim. And take the rest of your Blue Dogs with you.

Tim of UT 1:04PM November 30, 2010

I'm delighted to see such wonderful posts. I'm not too popular-media oriented, but I've heard ENOUGH about how this election proves that the Dems need to move more to the right. BS!!!!

That every single poster on this site disagrees with that premise is refreshing to me and, now, I don't feel so alone. A windbag like me doesn't even have anything to add.

Now, if we could just get our President and the Democratic Party (including the Blue Dogs who write such miserable op-eds) to hear US, the members of the Democratic Party, they may realize that they've been taken out behind the wood shed for a whipping BY THEIR PARTY'S MEMBERS!

Our Party has a much better history than this toothless aberation that is in place in the White House and the Blue Dog congress. We're trying to change that. Party Pols need to get their collective heads out of the sand.

Linda of WA 2:28PM November 28, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

advertisement