Does the United States Need Compulsory National Service?

October 18, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (44)

Does the United States need compulsory national service? Advocates say such a system, which could include both military and civilian service, would broaden horizons and help the country. Critics argue that such plans would only undermine America's natural charitable spirit and make the country more dependent upon the government.
Edited by Robert Schlesinger

Yes

William Galston
A former adviser to President Clinton and the Ezra K. Zilkha chair in governance studies at the Brookings Institution

A small percentage of Americans do the fighting for the rest of us, creating a wedge between military professionals and average citizens. Many elected officials lack military experience, and few have children in uniform. For most of us, defending our country is something we watch on television. Little in the lives of young Americans helps them understand...

READ MORE...

No

Matthew Spalding
Director of the B. Kenneth Simon Center for American Studies at the Heritage Foundation

Americans have always exhibited a strong sense of compassion toward their neighbors and those less fortunate. Volunteerism, what Alexis de Tocqueville called our "spirit of association," is in the national DNA. Policymakers have long recognized the importance of citizen engagement and philanthropic...

READ MORE...

What do you think?down arrow

Compulsory National Service--Good Idea?

View Results
Tags:
community service,
government,
national security terrorism and the military

Reader Comments Read all comments (44)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am a supporter of the idea of compulsury service on the grounds that we as Americans have been "babied" and "pampered" for way too long, we take everything we have as a right and not as the extreme privilege that it is. It brings a new light to things if you have to fight to have it and keep it. I am not so blinded that I can't see the cons of this idea; loss of freedom of choice being the chief of these, but at the same time, it will boost our economy by ensuring all high school students a job upon graduation, there will be a need for people to build the extra housing and food service facilities needed to support the influx of military personell as well as increased staff at the factories where the uniforms and other equipment is made. There is also the help with college education after service provided by the government that they will receive.

Yes I did volutarily join the US Army upon graduating high school and I am proud to have served my country even though it was only for a short time (I was discharged for a mental disorder that kept me from serving effectively),but I do believe there should be a sense of duty to serve your country. Simply put, if you want to live in a country where you are free to be whatever you want to be, including religion and even gender, without the government telling you you can't be that or do that, then you need to stand up and serve this country.

The complsory service should not be limited to born citizens either, if you wish to live in the US you should have to serve in the military as a condition of your citizenship (of course the checks to make sure you are not a terrorist trying to make it into the country could get expensive).

In conclusion.... America, love it or leave it.

Andrew of CO 10:49PM October 16, 2011

I missed by one year being drafted for occupation forces after WW2, then was drafted after college, served 2 years in U S Army, 7 months in Korea, a life building experience that I believe helped all draftees to become better citizens. Later, I came to believe that the Korean war was a mistake. If I had it to do over again, I would have opted for 2 years of non-military service, if available. But I am proud to have served, regardless. It would be great if our young people today would have the obligation to serve and do their share!T

Thomas McGeoghegan of NM 6:39PM February 22, 2011

No exemptions except for physical or mental disabilities. And I mean every child of every president, vice-president, senator or house representative must serve in the MILITARY.

If their sons and daughters had to go to war, maybe they would think twice about committing our children to sacrifice everything.

And, no person who had not served in the military could run for national office. Period. No exceptions here.

James Foy of MN 2:32PM November 17, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement