Warren Buffett's Billionaires Show Why Charity Trumps Government

It’s not hard to conclude that the Democratic Party is becoming hostile to charity.

By SHARE

History proves that individual effort and action can solve society's problems. Alexis de Tocqueville admired the ability of private "associations" to get Americans to volunteer their time and money for the common good. Here in D.C. after the Civil War, privately funded milk stations on street corners fed orphans. Those stations turned into medical clinics in underserved neighborhoods and still exist. In the 20th century, it was the March of Dimes, not the federal government, that primarily funded Jonas Salk's polio vaccine, saving millions of lives.

"The diversity of American giving," Bill Gates recently said, "is part of its beauty." It also has made the United States the most generous and successful nation in the world. Every day, millions of ordinary citizens volunteer in thousands of neighborhood organizations, schools and businesses, and church and youth groups across America. The uniquely American ethic of donating to charity is something that the liberals who are among the 38 billionaires understand, but that the rest of the Democratic Party is in danger of missing. If income equality were the answer, as big-government liberals believe, some of those billionaires would be writing extra checks to the U.S. Treasury. But they're not. I hope more liberal billionaires will follow the lead and sign up to give their fortunes to private charities. And I hope more liberal nonbillionaires follow as well. 

  • Check out this month's best political cartoons.
  • See which industries give the most to Congress.
  • Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our digital magazine.