Time to Restart the Battle Against HIV/AIDS

There’s a decided lack of energy on AIDS coming from the gay and lesbian community today

August 18, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Tom Sheridan is president of the Sheridan Group, which serves public interest advocacy efforts and designs socially responsible public policy initiatives. His client portfolio includes Bono's ONE Campaign, One Voice Against Cancer, Catholic Charities USA, and the America Forward coalition, and several AIDS-related charities and causes.

Today marks two major events in this country's history. Twenty years ago, the Ryan White CARE Act became law. And one year ago, Sen. Edward Kennedy passed away, having seen the bill he championed save hundreds of thousands of lives.

In 1990, as I huddled with the senator and his staff to write the nation's first response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, we were interrupted and told that Ryan White—the brave 19-year-old who challenged our presumptions and prejudices—was losing his battle with AIDS. Kennedy picked up the phone and asked Ryan's mother, Jeanne White, if it would be appropriate to name the bill for her dying son. I've always admired the grace and courage that enabled Mrs. White to see beyond her grief. Her support helped us pass a disaster assistance bill in response to an urgent national crisis.

We now have fewer deaths, more available drugs and treatments, more systems able to respond. But the initial response, repair, and recovery process has come to an end. Today's new HIV/AIDS challenges require the same kind of innovation and boldness that we, as a nation, demonstrated two decades ago. So, on this milestone anniversary, I'm compelled to offer this challenge: Let's honor Senator Kennedy and Ryan White by writing and passing the Ryan White CARE Act 2.0.

Ryan White was written when virtually no drug or pharmaceutical interventions were available, but drug access has nevertheless become the bill's primary focus. It was written for an epidemic that raged within the gay community, but HIV/AIDS is now a leading cause of death for African Americans, those with substance abuse issues, and for men who have sex with men but don't identify as gay. The bill couldn't mention education—in 1990, that was a political hot button. But half of today's new infections are among those under age 25 who clearly aren't getting enough HIV/AIDS education. And Ryan White never mentions preventive medicine, but huge strides have been made in that area. A new microbicide gel reduces a women's risk of infection by almost 40 percent. In five or 10 years, we'll probably have the equivalent of a "morning after pill" for HIV.

Clearly, it's time for an updated battle plan that is just as innovative as its predecessor. We need a bill that nationalizes the purchase of AIDS drugs similar to the Veterans Administration's approach, which could save 74 percent over open-market prices. With those savings, we could give greater numbers of Americans with HIV access to life-saving treatments. We need to merge care and prevention strategies so that the current wave of scientific discoveries has an express lane into the new at-risk communities. And we need to remove silos in the federal government that prevent agencies from coordinating care. The Centers for Disease Control, for example, could work much more closely with the Health Resources and Service Administration to develop innovative ideas for leveraging resources.

President Barack Obama's new plan essentially maintains the status quo, but doesn't bring forward any new ideas or offer much money. Twenty years ago, led by Senator Kennedy, our thinking was bolder and demanded more. Why not now?

Is part of the reason that we're just not holding the president's feet to the fire? There's a decided lack of energy on AIDS coming from the gay and lesbian community today, raising uncomfortable questions about who cares (and doesn't) about the new face of this disease. Why have no other groups stepped forward to address the new risks to their communities?

In 20 years things go stale, stakeholders become complacent; for-profit interests embed; innovation stops; creativity becomes lethargic. Edward Kennedy and Ryan White would demand that we honor the 20th anniversary of this bill and, indeed, their memory by committing ourselves to the Ryan White CARE Act 2.0. Let's get to it!

Tags:
health,
Ted Kennedy,
sex,
AIDS/ HIV,
Barack Obama,
Congress

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We have started a free HIV Dating personals website, http://www.positivedatings.com strictly for positive singles. We founded the site after an immediate family member, who is HIV positive, explained to us how difficult it was to find loveand friendship because of the stigmas attached to her condition. We want to help. If you or someone you know is living with HIV or AIDS please come visit our site and add us as a friend!!

andrea of NY 1:27AM September 12, 2010

Mr. Sheridan blurs the history of the federal response to HIV and his role in it, while playing loose with scientific data.

The Ryan White CARE Act is a tremendously important program, but contrary to his assertion it was not the nation's first response to AIDS.

According to a history of the act published by the federal agency that manages the program, "Congress had acted on HIV/AIDS care in a more limited way 2 years earlier with several provisions in the wide-ranging Health Omnibus Programs Extension (HOPE) of 1988. In addition to provisions on HIV research and prevention, the legislation included grants for home- and community-based health services, subacute care demonstration projects, and anonymous counseling and testing programs."

With several iterations of the law over the years, we are now beyond "Ryan White 2.0". The most recent version does include important prevention components, including an emphasis on helping people living with HIV who do not know they are infected learn their status so they can enter care--a major component of current prevention strategies funded by the CDC as well.

Mr Sheridan's flip reference to data on microbicide gels is irresponsible. The data coming out of South Africa this summer was very exciting, but the gel's effectiveness must be replicated in other studies before such assertions can made. Bringing the gel to market is still a couple of years away even in the best case scenario.

I am always doubtful of pieces that seem to have failed even basic fact checking (it's the "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" and the "Health Resources and Services Administration") and the disregard for the facts in this piece are troubling but not unexpected.

Bob of CA 12:17AM August 19, 2010

The portfolio doesn't mention anything about where AIDS priorities have been, overseas. We have provided health care entitlements through PEPFAR, which was originally a treatment program. As Congress tripled the budget to over 50 billion in the second five year entitlement cycle voted on just before the US Presidential vote; treatment became less a priority and the money went to 'portfolios' that don't provide drug treatment, but build offices and advertise. Treatment may actually have gone down, but we won't know until the PEPFAR Country Operational Plans come out, due now; supposedly this is now each country's job and not PEPFAR US?

Drug treatment at home is coming up as PEPFAR and foreign treatment entitlements with drugs are increasing in other areas; there is a priority to spend money on things other than treatment so that others may get a 'piece of the pie.' Maybe we should focus on just treatment and drugs as PEPFAR did in the beginning and wait to expand other areas until that is provided to all US AIDS patients. Health care is a priority, but not the drug treatment; a priority for AIDS patients. We need to keep these issues separate and make health care drug treatment a priority before expanding and giving everyone a 'piece of the pie.'

CS of AL 3:51PM August 18, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

advertisement