Rep. Gutierrez: Immigration Problem Requires a Federal Solution

The Arizona immigration law highlights the need for comprehensive immigration reform

July 30, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (17)

Luis Gutierrez is a Democratic House member from Illinois and chair of the Hispanic Caucus’s immigration task force.

Many see Arizona’s immigration law as a sign that voters want a no-holds-barred crackdown on illegal immigrants. But while much has been made of the law’s popularity in the polls, that same polling shows that those who support the Arizona law also support a comprehensive federal immigration solution.

Across the nation, there is tremendous frustration stemming from the perception that, at the federal level, no one seems to be minding the store. Congress and the White House do not seem to be setting, and enforcing, a clear set of rules that immigrants, employers, and everyone else are following. Few people know that deportations are up, illegal immigration is down, and the border is as safe as it has ever been. The issue has been polarized and politicized to a standstill, opening the door to thousands of state and local immigration initiatives, with Arizona’s law just the latest example. I understand the frustration provoked by our broken immigration system. But 50 state immigration policies are just a recipe for more chaos.

The tragedy is that the gridlock is avoidable. Democrats and Republicans agree on most of a unified, politically viable, and workable immigration reform package. Both parties agree that border security is a key part of any strategy. They would support boots on the ground and more effective management of our ports of entry to allow for legitimate commerce. Both parties also agree that we need a foolproof identification system that holds employers accountable and ends unauthorized work. This would ensure that individuals’ identities are more secure, that documents cannot be easily forged, and that businesses comply with the letter of our law. And we also agree that we need some level of legal immigration. Legal immigrants have been an engine of economic growth, innovation, and entrepreneurship on this continent for longer than we have been a nation. We need limits and a process, but we should not isolate the country.

The problem is that Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on what to do with the estimated 10.8 million illegal immigrants already here. Two-thirds have been here more than 10 years, and half live in families with children. There are about 4 million U.S. citizen children with at least one parent here illegally.

GOP lawmakers, by and large, think our immigration policies should drive out, deport, or otherwise get rid of those people and their families. That is at the heart of the Arizona law: make things so hostile that people deport themselves. Democrats, by and large, think that it is unrealistic to believe that a group larger than the population of Georgia will up and disappear.

We have a better plan. What Democrats propose, so far without a single Republican partner in Congress, is to make those immigrants register with the government, pay fines, pay taxes, learn English, and get in the system as a condition of staying.

We can keep spinning our wheels, making tough-sounding laws and calling anything that is not based on the mass exodus fantasy an “amnesty.” Or we can get together on a national basis and solve our immigration problem and heal the wounds of the immigration debate.

President Obama and the Justice Department are right to sue Arizona. Immigration policy should be set and enforced federally. That said, if the federal government is going to assert its pre-eminence, then Republicans and Democrats ought to find a way to work together to resolve their differences so that we restore law and order to our immigration system from the top down.

Read why Arizona's immigration law is good policy, by Trent Franks, a Republican House member from Arizona and a member of the House Judiciary Committee.

Tags:
Trent Franks,
Arizona,
Barack Obama,
Luis Gutierrez ,
immigration reform,
Congress,
Department of Justice

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We have an interesting debate going on the immigration issue at:

http://www.surveymagnet.com/2010/08/is-it-possible-to-end-the-immigration-problem-in-the-us/

Come join the discussion.

Survey Magnet of GA 2:13PM August 15, 2010

There is no doubt imigration needs to be dealt with. However it is unjustifiable not to enforce current law. It matters not whose in office. But if you say that the liberal media list you as prejudice. The elected officials, and appointees take an oath to protect this nation. They are failing it should be a termination offense as it would be in the real worl for failure to do your job.

This playing politics is rediculous those on the side of imigration reform need to understand that no permanent reform is possible as long as the borders are this fragile.

I have many hispanic friends that agree most are from south america and came legaly. Why should they and theyre familys wait in line. The mexicans should have no more right to citezenship than anyother country. This is rediculous Even the Cuba feet wet issue is appauling. Do haitians get the same treatment.

Federal govt do your job or lose it.

Jerry of NY 10:53AM August 06, 2010

In a decision that could lay the groundwork for an Arizona-style immigration policy, Virginia's attorney general said state law enforcement officers are allowed to check the immigration status of anyone "stopped or arrested."

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli issued the legal opinion Friday extending that authority to Virginia police in response to an inquiry over whether his state could mirror the policies passed into law in Arizona.

"It is my opinion that Virginia law enforcement officers, including conservation officers may, like Arizona police officers, inquire into the immigration status of persons stopped or arrested," he wrote.

The decision comes after a federal judge blocked Arizona from implementing its provision that would require law enforcement to check the immigration status of anyone they stop and suspect of being an illegal immigrant.

Cuccinelli's ruling could justify that kind of policy in Virginia. However, Cuccinelli reiterated in the opinion a prior finding that while state officers have the authority to arrest suspects on criminal immigration violations, they are advised against arresting over civil immigration violations. Overstaying a visa would fall under the latter category.

Apropo of CA 2:46PM August 02, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement