Should the Government Regulate Salt in Foods?

Readers react to the possibility of the FDA regulating salt

June 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Michael Jacobson at the Center for Science in the Public Interest says FDA regulation of salt would save many lives; John Tate of the Campaign for Liberty argues it would violate the Constitution. Your feedback:

I do not want the government to control my salt intake. That is my business.

WILLIAM STRANG Madison, Wis.

Oh goody, the salt police! Just what we need from our government. One more academician or government bureaucrat, do-gooder nanny, trying to run the details of our lives. No, we do not need this regulation. From mandatory low-flush toilets to low-temperature, hot-water heaters in new homes, their silly rules run our lives enough already.

JACK GREGORY Anderson, S.C.

I am salt-sensitive. I read labels. I buy reduced-sodium foods. I do not eat fast food very often. All I want is information, and then I can make my own choice. I prefer to run my own life, and I do control the sodium I take in.

LESLIE BROW Yacolt, Wash.

Yes, high-sodium levels are dangerous, but when did governmental regulation of mundane, non-inherently dangerous items become such a commonplace trend? More and bigger warning signs at fast-food restaurants would increase public hype over sodium levels, pressuring the restaurants to reduce levels on their own. The government should focus on public awareness and education before jumping straight to outright regulation. 

NANCY STEWART Montgomery, Ala.

While we’re at it, let’s ban not only salt but the sports of rock climbing and motorcycle riding (with or without a helmet), activities many times more risky than overconsumption of salt. And by all means, establish an agency—call it the Ministry of Utopian Bliss—with authority to ban any food or other product, or any activity that poses a politically incorrect risk (or is otherwise simply annoying to the enlightened few).

WILLIAM BURFORD Midland, Texas

It seems incredible how far some people will go to invoke the Constitution. Unfortunately we, the consumers, have little choice when it comes to processed foods. The salt content in canned soups, for example, is enormous. I think that astute business managers could benefit from an advertising campaign that highlights the advantage of lower salt consumption. The public might select low-sodium products without government regulation.

GEORGE LOWY Silver Spring, Md.

Regulate salt, sugar, trans fats, calories, smoking, housing, banks, Wall Street, pensions, pay, taxes, property, toys in Happy Meals, the Internet. When will it stop?

RANDY MORGAN Iron River, Wis.

There is an alternative available in the supermarkets: potassium chloride. It is more expensive than sodium chloride salt, but in the bigger scheme of things, not a significant part of the food budget. I season with it regularly, instead of sodium salt. It tastes nearly the same. It is easy. We do not need the government to watch over our daily lives. We need to take individual responsibility.

JOHN WARD Lake Jackson, Texas

Tags:
government,
obesity,
FDA,
weight loss,
sodium

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have been warning people that if they allowed them to ban smoking in public and private business thaus would be next. After this they will be limiting the number of children you can have. Someone posted a question when will it stop. It will stop when we stand together and say enough

Linda of TX 10:36PM November 14, 2010

Yeah.....Regulate salt and everything else that happens to offend whoever is in power at the time. Like:

1.Peanuts....Some people are allergic to them.

2.Candy......It causes teeth to rot.

3.Beans......They cause too much gas.

4.Soda Pop...Too much sugar. It rots the teeth.

5.Helmets....Make people riding in cars wear them. Deaths are from head injuries.

6.Game Scores...It hurts kids feelings if they lose.

7.Baseball bats...I understand that an agency is looking into that now.

8.and almost every other thing there is. Because almost everything offends someone.

It is incredible how Government wants to try and make daily life impossible to hurt yourself. Before you know it, it will be a crime if you hurt yourself accidentally.

VicM of CA 12:16PM June 22, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

advertisement