Mary Landrieu: Safe Offshore Drilling Is Key for Our Energy Future

We can remain the world leader in offshore energy production, but we must do so in a way that protects the world’s oceans and our coastal communities

June 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

Mary Landrieu is a Democratic senator from Louisiana and a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

As we remain mindful of the 11 men who perished on the Deepwater Horizon and continue to pray for their families, Gulf Coast communities are experiencing an unprecedented ecological disaster. Corrosive effects on the environment, economy, and way of life mount each day. Shock and sadness is turning to anger and frustration as we watch the thick, brown sludge seep into our bountiful marshes and wetlands.

[See photos of the Gulf oil spill disaster.]

These are not just Louisiana’s wetlands. They are America’s wetlands, and this is America’s working coast. The oil and gas, fishing, shipping, ecotourism, and hospitality industries all share it. Accounting for 40 percent of the nation’s wetlands, Louisiana’s coast produces 90 percent of America’s offshore energy and as much as 40 percent of the seafood harvested in the lower 48 states.

Yet efforts to protect our fragile and deteriorating coast have met with resistance from a government unwilling to acknowledge the risk communities bear when hosting drilling offshore. This began to change in 2006 when Congress approved a law allowing energy-producing coastal states to share a portion of federal revenues generated from resource development, a system interior states have enjoyed since 1920. But the legislation stipulated that states not receive significant funding until 2017. This shortsightedness is now painfully apparent as oil laps onto our beaches and marshes. To give the Gulf states a fighting chance to save their coast and America’s wetlands, revenue sharing must begin now.

Congress should also stay focused on America’s energy challenges. Even as we pursue renewable forms of energy, the United States consumes more than 20 million barrels of oil daily. Yet we produce less than half of that domestically. And more than 20 percent of our electricity is generated by natural gas, which is also important for chemical and fertilizer production. Natural gas can address several environmental concerns, including smog and greenhouse gas emissions, making it the bridge fuel to a low-carbon future.

Safely meeting America’s demand for oil and gas will require the federal government to clean house at the Minerals Management Service and hire, train, and pay the most-qualified people to oversee this important industry. As we consider the future of oil and gas production off our shores, a new regulatory regime should focus on deep-water operations (those in more than 1,000 feet of water) that feature greater risk and more challenging technology. At the direction of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, shallow water operations are proceeding. This decision will preserve thousands of jobs in the region and the future of hundreds of companies that would be put at risk with unnecessary delays.

We must learn the right lessons and take measured steps forward. Congress cannot afford to react to this disaster as we did following the meltdown at Three Mile Island, when the government unwisely halted all nuclear power plant construction for 30 years. Our nation should instead respond as we did after the Challenger tragedy. NASA put the shuttle program on hiatus, carefully reviewed what went wrong, and corrected those mistakes. As a result, the United States is still the standard bearer in space technology and an industry that generates hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs is thriving.

We can remain the world leader in offshore energy production, including oil, gas, wind, wave, and other technologies. But we must do so in a way that protects the world’s oceans and our coastal communities. With bold vision, innovation, and the right leadership, America can meet this challenge.

Read why new offshore drilling is a bad idea, by Bill Nelson, a Democratic senator from Florida and a member of the Senate Commerce Committee.

Tags:
Bill Nelson,
Ken Salazar,
Gulf of Mexico,
Louisiana,
BP,
energy,
Mary Landrieu,
Congress,
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Of course the moratorium is necessary.

We can not trust a single approval that has come from the former MMS, and every offshore well is a ticking time bomb, no better than domestic terrorism.

we don't have to tolerate the boom/bust oil drilling mentality, especially as we find out most these offshore rigs are foreign companies carpetbagging with all the profits and leaving the place a sticking disaster after they're done. Its not American oil they are drilling for in the Gulf - its British profits and British oil delivered to international markets.

I don't have problem with drilling for oil, just foreign companies who want to do it on the cheap shortcutting every thing possible. Oil drilling can be done right - Norway is proof, and Norway has the highest standard of living in the world because of it. Other countries get rich off off their oil, while the Gulf Coast (maybe supplies the cheap roughneck labor) is as close to 3rd world America.

The Gulf is not sharing in the booty of all the oil pulled from their shores so why would we want to let them c0ome take our resources without the least bit of precautions. BP has proved they were completey unprepared by fraudulently got license to drill by dishonesty and corruption.

Its all too apparent these foreign oil companies have bought off politicians, judges and regulatory agencies that we now know that its been a free-for-all to be able to pillage American resources for foreign companies.

Til we get to the bottom of the extent of corruption in the oil drilling business the moratorium is absolutely necessary.

Jimbo Timar of KY 9:48PM June 24, 2010

I work for big oil. I've been in drilling for almost 30 years. I've lived on and worked in the GOM. I am angry with BP for making several questionable operational decisions that led to this tragic event that killed 11 people, is polluting the Gulf and has changed for the worse, in some cases much worse, the lives of all Americans. I am equally angry about BP's PR effort after the tragedy. They continue to deny the basic cause of this event: a bad decision to use a poor well design. Tony Hayword said that the odds of such an "accident" happening were 1-in-100,000 to 1-in-1,000,000. In reality, with this design, the odds were more like 1-in-10 to 1-in-100.

All drilling involves risk. All human activity involves risks. We are all risk managers. BP did a poor job at risk management.

I am usually critical of Congress, but Rep. Waxman's and Stupak's letter from the House Committee on Energy and Commerce to Tony Hayward dated June 14, 2010 is excellent (the hearing not so much). They list 5 causes for the disaster. All were bad choices BP made. Number 1 was the well design. This letter identifies mistakes BP made and that they should have reported to the American people on around Day 10. There is no mystery except, "Why?"

Operators not using BP's design or procedures should not be shut-down. Consider: a relief well is the only way to stop this flow. BP is currently drilling 3 of them in the same deep-water environment. If we are willing to allow BP to continue drilling, albeit out of necessity, why the necessity to shut down all operators?

Change the design requirements. Change some blowout preventer rules on certification, maintenance, testing and record keeping. Change temporary abandonment barrier test procedures. Review and revise all current drilling plans accordingly. The deep-water drilling moratorium is much pain for very little gain. BP’s bad risk management need not be followed by a government display of the same. Unfortunetely, the damage of this moratorium will not be limited to big oil.

Jeff of CO 6:38PM June 18, 2010

I remember when the Oklahoma City Federal Building blew up - Came at a perfect time for the Clinton Administration. The right was gaining power and militias were popping up everywhere. Then....poof!... from a truckload of fertilizer parked in the street.

Those "weapons of mass destruction" disappeared once we got into Iraq. Guess they weren't needed once we invaded.

Our Green - Socialist prez grabs a little conservative cred by saying that he'll consider expanding offshore drilling. 2 weeks later there is the worse oil platform accident in history - allowing B'HO the cover to crawfish with righteous indignation and then slam his green agenda down our throats - at the same time re-energizing the faltering Global Warming - Environmentalist agenda. What a stroke of luck for the Greenies.

Amazing how that all worked out...

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:01PM June 08, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement