The Next Rand Pauls

June 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (27)

There are other potential Rand Pauls in battleground races around the country: grassroots favorites aiming to sweep aside more conventional, establishment picks. They share the kind of astringent ideology that can excite Tea Partyers while turning off swing voters.

The top contender to be the next Paul may be former Nevada state Assemblywoman Sharron Angle, who is in a three-way dogfight for that state's June 8 primary. Casino owner and former state party chair Sue Lowden seemed to be cruising to the nomination before she started opining about returning to a healthcare barter system. Her approving recollections of people paying their doctors with live poultry (surely giving new meaning to the phrase "wing-nut") prompted Democrats to call her health plan "Chickens for Checkups."

As Lowden stumbled, the Tea Party Express endorsed Angle, who surged out of polling obscurity. Democrats thrill at the idea of squaring her off against flagging Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Her platform is a fringe greatest hits. The departments of Energy and Education, and the Environmental Protection Agency are all unconstitutional, she argues, and she wants to pull the United States out of the United Nations and abolish campaign contribution limits. Oh yeah, and she wants to privatize Social Security. No wonder a Reid aide told Politico: "She's a female Rand Paul."

Or take Colorado, where incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet (who himself faces a primary challenge), polls in the low 40s. National Republicans quietly boosted former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. But grassroots conservatives favor Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck, who nabbed 76 percent of the votes at the state party's convention, securing him the top spot on the primary ballot on August 10. (Norton had skipped the convention, opting to get onto the ballot by collecting voter signatures.)

There seem to be few substantive differences between Buck and Norton, but Norton's establishment imprimatur, combined with Buck's more truculent profile, has the rabid base riled up. Buck gained notoriety in Colorado in 2008 when he (illegally, the state Supreme Court later ruled) seized thousands of returns from a local tax preparer on a fishing expedition for illegal immigrants. Image and tone matter, especially where swing voters are concerned, a fact reflected in poll numbers showing Bennet slightly ahead of Buck, but slightly behind Norton.

Republicans may get luckier in California against Sen. Barbara Boxer and in Washington against Sen. Patty Murray, where the right's favorites are still marked underdogs, against more moderate—more electable—establishment favorites.

The notion that Rand Paul may be a harbinger rather than an outlier has some GOP-ers worried. The fact that he and his friends could actually win should bother everyone else.

Tags:
Ted Kaufman,
Democratic Party,
Michael Bennet,
Jim DeMint,
Robert Bennett,
Arlen Specter,
Joe Sestak,
Jane Norton,
Roland Burris,
Evan Bayh,
Ben Nelson,
Tea Party,
Mike Castle,
Byron Dorgan,
Barbara Boxer,
Parker Griffith,
2010 Congressional elections,
Mark Kirk,
Sherrod Brown,
Patty Murray,
Mitch McConnell,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Rand Paul,
Harry Reid,
Dan Coats,
Joe Biden,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Between right wing fascists threatening violence and racists bashing minorities and blaming them for all our problems we've got a real roll call of Rhodes Scholars here. I often wonder about the education level of some of the people who read this blog.

steve of IL 9:41PM June 24, 2010

Does Robert Schleisinger believe what he writes? Is it possible that an honest man can watch the world financial system shake the United States down for all it's worth, including all it can borrow, and watch the federal congress just shell out trillions of dollars to these criminal monopolies, and then believe that we should all just be practical, and let ELECTABLE politicians continue to rob us blind, unravel Constitution provisions, rail against nukes in every country except our own, allow fiat money to be the controlled by a few hundred man who are all, surprise, surprise, billionaires?

These culprits that Robert calls ELECTABLE are so because they go along with the agenda of the Federal Reserve, the WHO, the WTO, and all of these magical cash cows who do nothing but use that money to stack the odds against us in our own political system.

Hijacked, is the word often used for the U.S. Congress. Enough with false leadership from those who are supposed to be our servants. Enough with their fake emergencies, and anti-constitutional stances, and financial bubbles, and murder sprees, genocide, torture, and theft.

I'll let Robert remain in fantasy land, if indeed he is an honest man (as opposed to a paid propagandist), in which the preceding characteristics garner a politician the requisite ELECTABILITY that practicality demands. For the rest of us, it's time to use our common sense again. And odd as it may be, to actually go and do something that might require us to interact with other human beings not on our computers.

Until Robert and his ilk are laughed out of town with his notion that ESTABLISHMENT candidates intend to stand by and help as our country is brought down by the insatiable greed of a very, very few men, who mean to end national sovereignty world wide.

This is NOT a battle between honest ideologies of left and right (a thought box designed to control all public political discourse). Nor is it a battle between the gays and straights, the christians and non-christians, the jews and the non-jews, the whites and the blacks, the choicers and lifers, nor even the patriots against the establishment.

The battle is truth against obfuscation. Stop accepting the nonsense you see on TV and read in these pro-establishment articles that pass as honest editorial. All honest men know what's right and what is not. Killing is wrong. Profiteering is WRONG! Taking the wealth of the public and spraying it into an orgy of greed is SO wrong that it must be stopped.

Robert, why don't you write an article on how we can go about recovering the money system so mightily damaged by the plutocracy? Or how the grass roots movements can unite to become ELECTABLE? Or maybe you want to live through the loss of the last Constitutional Republic on Earth.

Think about it.

Eric Holder of NY 10:02AM June 23, 2010

I am so looking forward to a great election this November with some good and honest patriots running such as Rand Paul, Sharron Angle and Carly Fiorina! America is not only looking for some people with integrity and strong moral values but those who are tired of the spending of our run-away government involved in every aspect of our lives. We're suffocating!

Skye Pearl of OR 1:04AM June 22, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

advertisement