Why the FDA Should Regulate Salt in Foods

Scientists have known for decades that high-sodium diets tend to raise blood pressure, and that high blood pressure causes heart attacks and strokes

May 25, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Michael Jacobson is the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest and a nutrition expert.

Imagine the tragedy if every day for years on end a crowded jetliner crashed. Then imagine the outrage when the public learned that those tragedies had been preventable, but that the airlines and government had done nothing. Fortunately, jetliners rarely crash. But excessive salt in our food is causing several hundred preventable deaths every day—100,000 deaths each and every year. And the food industry and government have done virtually nothing.

Scientists have known for decades that high-sodium diets tend to raise blood pressure, and that high blood pressure causes heart attacks and strokes. Yet for years, the American food (and salt) industry has fended off regulation. The outspoken Salt Institute has demanded ever more evidence that efforts to lower sodium consumption would be effective. For instance, it has complained that there were no direct studies showing that reducing salt would decrease the occurrence of heart attacks and strokes.

Now, a small number of such studies have been done. The most telling is the Trials of Hypertension Prevention. More than a thousand people were encouraged to cut the sodium content of their diets, while a similar group served as a control group. Ten to 15 years later, the group that consumed less salt had at least a 25 percent lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

Due to the huge body of research showing that reduced sodium intake lowers the risk of heart attacks and strokes, countless health organizations have recommended that people consume less sodium. In 1979, a committee advising the Food and Drug Administration concluded that salt should no longer be considered "generally recognized as safe." Since 1980, six successive editions of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans have advised reducing sodium, and the FDA has urged the industry to voluntarily reduce sodium. In 2003, a joint statement by 39 major health organizations called for a 50 percent reduction of sodium in the food supply within 10 years.

Unfortunately, Congress, the FDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the food industry have done so little that Americans are actually consuming more sodium than we were 30 years ago. Three-fourths of that sodium comes from packaged and processed foods. According to our research, some meals at restaurants like Denny's or IHOP provide as much as three or four times the sodium an adult should consume in a whole day.

While America dithered, the British government commenced a comprehensive campaign that began with advertisements to convince the public that cutting salt intake was important. But the core of the effort was to pressure manufacturers and restaurants to lower sodium levels. Multinational companies such as Kraft, PepsiCo, and McDonald's are cooperating.

Last month, New York City's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, backed by other local and state health departments, announced a voluntary program modeled on the British one. Unfortunately, only a handful of companies agreed to participate. Also last month, a committee of the Institute of Medicine, a unit of the National Academy of Sciences, urged the FDA to require companies to gradually lower sodium levels to cut consumption without offending consumers' taste buds.

The ball is in the Obama administration's court. The FDA and USDA could simply follow the example of its predecessors and ask companies to, pretty please, reduce sodium levels. Or it could follow the IOM's advice and regulate. After all, a jetliner's worth of fathers and mothers, husbands and wives, are dying every day.

Read why governmental regulation of sodium is a bad idea, by John Tate, president of the Campaign for Liberty and the national political director of Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign.

Tags:
government,
obesity,
FDA,
Barack Obama,
weight loss,
sodium,
heart disease

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

While I agree that salt, in high quantities, can be bad for you, I do not agree that it's within the rights of the US government to control it. We have sodium content listed on every food item that we purchase, including every single restaurant that I've been in in the past couple years. We are offered plenty of alternative low sodium versions of foods in the stores, and are inundated with plenty of "salt is bad for you" information for us to make PERSONAL CHOICES. I choose to restrict my salt intake. The government has more important things to do than to worry about controlling the lives of Americans and controlling what we have in the way of salt. Get on with those more important things and stop trying to micro manage my life. I'm tired of the nanny state telling me what I can and cannot do, eat, say, etc.

Sherri of MA 3:24PM November 25, 2011

A recent study confirmed that a restricted salt diet will help 30% of people with high blood pressure. There is no study that shows that the general population will benefit by salt restriction, while is is a fact that humans will die if we do not get enough salt. Any cardiologist will tell you that potassium is just as bad - or worse, than sodium, yet potassium salt is a common substitute for table salt. Junk science is commonly used by statists to increase government power over an ever-widening part of our lives.

Just as the "low-fat" scare resulted in higher consumption of carbohydrates, and is indicated as a cause of our obesity and diabetes epidemics, CDC continues to advance junk science "results" as a cure-all for everybody, but the biggest beneficiary is them, and their government masters.

Mitchell Fleister of WA 6:12PM June 04, 2010

Why is the "focus" on SALT....tobacco kills as many or more, how about liquor and OMG - SUGAR and obesity....and the welfare program promotes coach potatoes...let's get them on an exercise program.....this entire country is so far gone and we have elected people who are choking on peanuts instead of the more serious issues facing us today....

People must be held accountable for THEIR own actions...starting with the elected officials first.

Beth Miller of KS 10:45AM June 03, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement