The Republicans' Tea Party Problem

May 20, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

Presumably Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele doesn't need to be told that a document that approved of slavery and counted slaves as three-fifths persons was defective. Nor would the framers have taken offense since they included a mechanism for amending the Constitution and immediately used it to add on the Bill of Rights.

But the GOP defense of the Constitution was not about rational, mainstream argument. It was aimed squarely at the hyperpatriotic, kitchen table constitutional scholars who currently reside in the activated portion of the GOP base. This is the Tea Party movement and, more broadly, the conservative outrage coalition that yearns to "take back" our country in a way that often has a distinctly antebellum view of states' rights.

Parties and politicians must cater to their base voters. But the urgency with which the GOP is doing it makes it look like a party with a perpetual primary-race mentality. The establishment, haunted by the specter of a Tea Party-driven urge to purge, seems to continually need to demonstrate its worthiness. But even primary candidates eventually have to tack back to the center to win general elections. The problem for Republicans is that Tea Party petulance and ideological certitude could keep the party on the fringe.

Take an issue as apparently GOP-friendly as healthcare reform. Since President Obama signed the bill in March, its poll numbers have narrowed but it remains unpopular. Pollster.com's average of polls shows a bit less than 44 percent favoring healthcare reform and a little more than 49 percent opposing it. It should be a political winner for the GOP. But Republicans seem intent on overplaying their hand, campaigning not merely against the law but affirmatively pledging its repeal. Such a promise may exhilarate the base, but could prove tone-deaf for voters who like individual elements of the plan, such as parents being able to keep children under age 26 on their healthcare plans. That's why Democrats have launched a campaign to highlight the GOP's repeal fervor. "Are Republicans really willing to deny our young people their healthcare coverage just to score a few cheap political points?" Rep. George Miller, the California Democrat who chairs the House Education and Labor Committee, asked last month. [See who supports Miller.]

The law doesn't even have to achieve net popularity to pose a danger to Republicans. If it simply becomes neutral, voters who were frustrated by Democrats' never-ending efforts to pass the bill, rather than focus on jobs, will wonder at the GOP's obsession with overturning it.

Then there are those jobs. Republicans seized on the slight uptick in last month's unemployment rate, from 9.7 percent to 9.9 percent. But House GOP Leader John Boehner's asking, "Where are the jobs?" looked blunderingly partisan because the economy created 290,000 new jobs, making April the strongest month in four years. If the trend continues, GOP chants of "socialism," while necessary to keep base conservatives happy, could make the party seem stridently out of touch.

Or consider immigration, another issue on which Democrats seem poised to cooperate with good fortune. Pivoting off of the controversial Arizona law, Democrats will soon start debating an immigration bill in Congress. A tougher-than-thou immigration stance is de rigueur, for the Republican base. And, in fairness, it could have short-term traction with economically insecure voters.

But Hispanics are not only the largest but also the fastest-growing minority group in the country. They will make up 25 percent of the U.S. population in 2050. And while they are often culturally conservative, they tend to feel targeted and alienated by tough immigration rhetoric. As recently as 2004, the GOP had room to position itself to appeal to these voters, and George W. Bush won more than 40 percent in that group. But immigration politics have reversed Bush's progress. A poll commissioned by the New Democrat Network, released last month, gave Democrats a 59 percent to 23 percent advantage in this critical demographic group.

Tags:
Elena Kagan,
Michael Bennet,
Michael Steele,
Judd Gregg,
George Miller,
Tea Party,
Republican Party,
Barbara Boxer,
John McCain,
Ron Paul,
John Boehner,
Harry Reid

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Not everyone is American. If you can't support the fact that though my opinion is different than yours and that I have just as much right to speak and act on it than I don't think you adhere to the ideals of an American in a constitutional Republic. This idea that we are some how a "democracy" is as twisted as liberal thinking. The fact that you claim to be a "treehugger" exposes your thoughts that we should apologize for the industrial revolution taking us back "hundreds" of years. That type of dialectic materialism is as foolish as Obama or Stalin's fix for the budget crisis...... Take over the industry.

My suggestion to you treehugger is go find your stash of drugs and smoke a few more..... maybe you can be quiet along with your stupidity!

Jeff of WI 9:57PM June 01, 2010

that's threatening to regulate the internet. And it's conservative judges that continually let sexually-violent criminals off. And of course it's conservatives who are threatening boycotts against Americans who politically disagree with them. And Pres. Obama REALLY isn't in bed with George Soros, GE, Goldman-Sachs, BP, Van Jones (and his ilk!)- It just looks that way!!

Treehugger of CO, you were right!! It's me that's backwards - of course JUSTICE shouldn't be blind, it should be one-sided toward liberals/progressives and their drive to create a universal 'fairness'. Thank you so much!! God Bless You!

Donna of TX 7:16PM May 21, 2010

and distract us from the real issues, I would be surprised to see the tea party last beyond 2012 Although I would love to see new political parties that are based on the teachings of our forefathers.

I have been a democrat most of my voting years, I am now a independent who is somewhat pleased with President Obama but wished he had more backbone.

President Obama deserves to win in 2012, Nevertheless our next president should come from a new party, the parties of the past and present of which we had presidents are Democratic, Republican, Whig, Democratic-Republican, Federalist, Independent.

I noticed George Washington (1789-1797) was an independent.

Big business will dissolve our freedoms and must be put out of the white house before big business dissolves America with there reckless spending

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_political_affiliation

Don D. Brock of AZ 3:31PM May 21, 2010

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Poll Finds Congress' Popularity Hits Historic Lows

Polling shows Congress has achieved historic unpopularity.

House GOP 20 Week Abortion Ban Vote Was a Waste of Time

Abortion should be left up to the states.

The NSA, Guns and Privacy in the Obama Administration

The Obama administration’s needs to take a long look in the mirror after revelations about government surveillance.

Polls Show American People Hate Almost Everything About Politics

The American people are breaking up with politics.

Do You Believe NSA Leaker Edward Snowden or President Obama?

Should we take the word of the NSA leaker or Obama?

Obama, Boehner and the GOP Crisis of Leadership

It’s tough for anyone to lead when some in the GOP seem committed to their own destruction.

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

advertisement