Why 'Open Carry' Gun Laws Work

Second Amendment or no, law-abiding citizens have the right to go about their business

April 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print

John Pierce, cofounder of OpenCarry.org, is a second-year student at Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minn., and holds an M.B.A. from George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.

The phrase "open carry" refers to the act of law-abiding citizens carrying a properly holstered handgun in plain sight, wherever it is legal to do so, as they go about their daily lives. This includes such mundane tasks as driving to work, walking the dog, grabbing a cup of coffee at Starbucks, or buying a book at Barnes & Noble. Those who choose open carry are just going about their business while armed, just as do the 6 million-plus Americans who hold concealed-carry permits. The only difference—open carriers have taken their jackets off.

Contrary to popular opinion, the ability to carry a weapon openly does not currently derive from the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution but rather from the constitutions and statutes of the 50 states. This is important because those who are opposed to open carry often attempt to characterize it as an oddity of the law or a mischaracterization of the U.S. Constitution. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

In fact, in the majority of states, any law-abiding citizen who is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a firearm may openly carry a loaded handgun with no license or permit required. In the majority of these 29 states, this right is based upon state constitutional provisions. And while anti-gun activists often argue that the prefatory clause of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution brings the intent of the framers into question, the history, tradition, and practice of law-abiding citizens peacefully bearing arms is spelled out time and time again in state constitutional provisions whose interpretation is clear.

In an additional 14 states, citizens who hold a state-issued carry permit may carry openly or concealed as they see fit. It is of particular import that in these states, the legislatures crafted their carry statutes in such a way as to avoid requiring concealment of the firearms thus carried. If open carry were the public safety issue that anti-gun activists proclaim it to be, it is hard to imagine 14 separate legislatures actively passing legislation enabling the practice. It is also illustrative to note that the majority of these carry statutes have been passed within the last several decades. This demonstrates that such legislative thought is not an anachronism, as often claimed by those who are anti-gun. Rather, such carry statutes reflect a modern, individual-rights focus that finds open carry appropriate when balancing the personal protection interests of its citizens with the state's interest in ordered liberty.

In attempting to discredit open carry, anti-gun activists often like to ask the question, "How do I know that the person openly carrying is in fact a law-abiding citizen and not a criminal?" While this is an attempt to imply that anyone who lawfully carries a firearm is a potential criminal, thankfully there is an authoritative answer available. The 2006 FBI study "Violent Encounters: A Study of Felonious Assaults on Our Nation's Law Enforcement Officers" by Anthony Pinizzotto revealed that criminals carefully conceal their firearms, and they eschew the use of holsters. In layman's terms, this report tells us that, statistically speaking, citizens who are openly wearing a properly holstered handgun and are willing to subject themselves to the intense public and law enforcement scrutiny that open carry brings with it are not criminals.

But with open carry legal in some form in 43 states, and with the practice becoming increasingly common, it is not surprising that citizens unfamiliar with the practice might have questions when they first see a neighbor carrying openly. And these questions are often directed to local law enforcement. One of our key missions at OpenCarry.org is to serve as an educational resource for citizens and law enforcement alike when such questions arise in order to insure that interactions between citizens and law enforcement respect both the rights of the citizen and the difficult job being performed by the officer. Interestingly, the increasing normality of open carry has helped to ensure that law enforcement officers across the country have been educated about its legality, rendering such encounters infrequent.

So is open carry right for America? The answer is an unequivocal "yes!" Already present in the vast majority of states, the increasing popularity of the open-carry movement is a visible symbol that the right to bear arms remains a vital, core right of American citizens.

Read why the proliferation of guns—even legal ones—is a danger, by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York.

Check out this month's best political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our digital magazine.

Tags:
weapons,
Second Amendment,
gun control and gun rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (56)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The difference between a citizen and a subject is the legality of being armed. Thus, as global citizens in the eyes of God (however you see Him, or not), the right to keep and bear arms existed BEFORE governments, and is merely protected by the second amendment across America. The fact in infringement within or external to those borders does not negate that right. Furthermore, it merely displays the illegal actions of those "governments". All other rights (to include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness up to infringing on another's rights also come from the Creator. Governments merely get in Gods way!

Texas Trucker of VA 7:58PM November 19, 2011

It's our right as individuals to display 'our' form of criminal deterrent techniques to the future and present criminals of today's society. And furthermore, as a citizen in today's society...I definitely would feel more solace and comfort in knowing that someone has stepped forward to deter and ward off any crime including and not limited to deadly personal harm of myself or that of one of my loved one's. walk with confidence....arm up it's your right if you want to.

twp of TX 11:24AM June 06, 2011

Sir, I'm afraid I take offence at your presuming to tell Americans how to be Australians. We HAVE set the world an example. One which your country, and others, ignore at their peril. For as Thomas Paine (a great Revolutionary writer) wrote,"The first duty of a patriot is to protect his country from it's government".

Your countrymen's surrender of arms (in accordance with an agreement with the UN), is the first step in their failure to do so.

Thomas Paine also wrote (from THE CRISIS, NO.1);"...the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf; and we ought to guard equally against both." and, "...the first object is partly by threats and partly by promises, to terrify or seduce the people to deliver up their arms and to recieve mercy."

Abraham Lincoln said that some principles are so important that we may not and must not compromise. America is a COUNTRY of people, first and foremost- not a government. In fact, our Constitution grants us the right to replace our government if it gets too onerous or oppressive in the view of the majority. That is the lesson and example the rest of the world should take from the USA.

However, if the world doesn't want to... why, we'll just mind our own business, and not have the nerve to tell other countries what to do!

Marie Rich of SC 1:19AM March 04, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

May Unemployment Rate Dooms Barack Obama

With unemployment now at 8.2 percent, Mitt Romney is poised to gain ground with voters.

Planned Parenthood Pulls a Komen on Mitt Romney

Planned Parenthood successfully targeted the Susan G. Komen Foundation and is now getting political by campaigning against Mitt Romney.

Bill Clinton Undercuts Barack Obama in Wisconsin

Former President Bill Clinton is campaigning for Democrats across the country, disregarding Obama's campaign strategies.

Barack Obama Doesn’t Get a Pass on Poland Gaffe

The president's error and half-hearted apology is a serious diplomatic mistake.

Mitt Romney's Ridiculous Unemployment Reaction

Romney's dramatic reaction to the May jobs report makes him look false and calculating.

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

advertisement