'Open Carry' Gun Laws Turn the Country Back into the Wild West

Rights of non-packing Starbucks customers should count, too

April 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy is a seven-term congressional Democrat serving New York's 4th District on Long Island.

There are only three states, Florida, Texas, and Illinois, and the District of Columbia that outright prohibit the open carrying of handguns. Only three! Now, contrary to public perception, I have never been against people owning guns for protection, hunting, or sport. But there are days when I read the newspaper or am watching the news and it seems as if our country is back in the Wild West. Brazenly carrying firearms into restaurants and bars and schools and churches creates a situation that is intimidating to families, and poses risks to law enforcement and to the community.

In the summer of 2009, a man stood just outside a venue in New Hampshire with President Obama inside talking about healthcare reform. He had a gun openly strapped to his thigh. Another time while the president was giving a speech at the convention center in Phoenix, a dozen people were openly carrying guns, including one who walked around with an AR-15 assault rifle strapped to his back. In this session of Congress, laws were passed to allow guns on Amtrak trains and in our national parks. Where does it end? When will people realize that we are moving backwards in reducing gun violence? And now it is happening throughout the states.

For example, Virginia recently passed a bill that will allow people to carry concealed guns in bars and restaurants as long as they do not consume any alcohol. According to a October 2009 Christopher Newport University poll, 68 percent of likely voters in Virginia answered "no" when asked if they thought people with concealed weapons permits should be allowed to bring their guns into restaurants that sell alcohol— 68 percent! What happened to listening to what the voters want? I further agree with the State Association of Chiefs of Police, who sent a letter to Gov. Bob McDonnell asking that he veto the law because the combination of firearms and alcohol is similar to drinking while driving. Shouldn't we at least listen to those whose job it is to keep us safe: our law enforcement officials?

When it comes to open carrying of guns, which most states allow, California's San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, in a Jan. 14, 2010 press release, described the challenge best, stating that, "It's all well and good in hindsight to say [a] gun carrier was simply 'exercising their rights' but the result could be deadly. Simply put, it is not recommended to openly carry firearms."

A lot of businesses have banned guns in their stores, which under some open-carry state laws is allowed. But some have not, like Starbucks. Are people going to have a shoot-out at their local coffee shop if their grande latte order is incorrect? If somebody walked into a Starbucks and started pouring and drinking bourbon with their coffee, I am sure families, especially those with children, would be concerned. And I am sure the authorities would be called. I realize that is an extreme, but when open carry has occurred in retail stores, other customers generally become alarmed and the police are called to the scene. This, as noted by the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, creates a volatile and potentially dangerous situation. Everyone should be able to sit in a coffee shop or a local diner with their families without being confronted with the threatening presence of openly displayed handguns.

Once again, I am not against people owning and carrying their guns, nor am I attacking an individual's Second Amendment rights. But there need to be limits. We need to come together and have a national conversation on guns. If we don't, we will continue to see guns be a part of all aspects of society, with more dangerous weapons on the streets. We can respect the rights of gun owners while at the same time doing more to keep illegal guns off the streets and reducing gun violence in our nation, such as by closing the gun show loophole, enforcing the laws on the books, and preventing terrorists from being able to buy guns, instead of allowing guns in our cherished parks and on our trains.

Read why "open carry" is good for all Americans, by John Pierce, cofounder of OpenCarry.org.

Check out this month's best political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our digital magazine.

Tags:
Second Amendment,
weapons,
gun control and gun rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (127)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A gun in and of itself is NOT a dangerous weapon. A gun is a an inanimate object. People seem to think it has the ability to just inflict harm all by itself. It is the person that is dangerous. Statistics are very clear showing a decrease in crime in areas where a proliferation of lawful gun carrying Americans exist. Criminals may be dumb, but they're not stupid. They will carefully choose their target, and move on if they think they are armed. Gun free zones provide them a haven to wreak havoc on the law abiding. Wake up and use your educated mind for something other than spin.

Chris W of PA 7:45PM February 09, 2012

Because we are not used to see guns every second of every day is the reason why people become nervous or up on their guard. Now when people complain about "gun violence" what are they actually referencing? Cause I am sure that 9 times out of 10 that most "gun violence" is result of people either getting guns illegally or the people who buy them and dont know how to properly use them. Most Americans are patriotic and believe in our laws and constitution, so if they feel more secure with either walking the dog, going grocery shopping, or just everyday routines while carry a fire arm why should they be denied that. Thats part of our American right. Just like Freedom of speech that people love to use against our right to bear arms, so if they have to right to speak I should have the right to carry if I feel like it.

Robert Kissner of IL 7:33AM January 31, 2012

To the author,

You should assume that everyone is potentially armed at all times. I carry, and personnally prefer that people open carry. I spent plenty of time in combat in Afghanistan as a member of an infantry unit in the U.S. Army. I learned a little about human nature in that environment. That is why I choose to carry a fire arm. I consider it my right to protect myself, and my responsibility to protect those around me, especially women, children and the elderly. If I'm under equipped to preform my duties to my country, and those innocent people around me, than I have failed to live up to my responsibilities, and am less of a man. I'd gladly give my life for my country, but I'd much rather the bad guy give up his life.

I see no need to curse or otherwise chastise you for your views, but I compell you to change your very vocal stance. There are many like me, and for that, you should feel a lot safer while going about your daily activities.

Jonathan Sublett of VA 11:46AM January 29, 2012

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement