Should NCAA Ban Schools From March Madness for Low Graduation Rates?

March 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Soon, the teams will be chosen and the brackets will be filled out for the office pool, all part of the walk-up to the latest outbreak of March Madness that begins Tuesday. It's all fun and games from there. Or is it? The NCAA basketball championship is great for fans, schools, and sponsors—and Las Vegas—but some ask whether it is good for student athletes, with graduation rates dismal at many colleges. They call for underperforming or academically indifferent schools to be excluded from postseason play. Others say players understand the deal and suggest that the NCAA should give up the "amateur" pretense and earn its millions honestly.

What do you think? Should graduation rates determine NCAA tournament eligibility? Take our poll and weigh in below. And don't miss the debate between Ben Miller of Education Sector and Marc Isenberg, author of Money Players, in this week's issue of U.S. News Weekly.

Should the NCAA weigh graduation rates when inviting schools to March Madness?

View Results

Previously: Are National Education Standards a Smart Idea?

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Yes, weigh, at least to a reasonable degree,graduation rates--we're talking college, as in education, not sports factories. Dumbing-down, pretense, and otherwise gaming the system to produce "winners" (read money) do not represent the ideals educational institutions should be dedicated to achieving. Players are supposed to be students, not just athletes, so the NCAA need to find a way to enforce reasonable academic requirements. Academic eligibility rules for individual athletic participation are already in place but need to be strengthened, given the Sports 101 courses allowed. But there's nothing in place to pressure institutions--and there's nothing quite like loss of--or inability to enhance--money and fame to "encourage" these "institutions of higher learning" to take more seriously their obligation to educate.

As for paying college athletes, I sympathize with those who protest the pretense of their "amateur" status, and I wouldn't register a definite "no" to a stipend, given the monetary value they can bring to the colleges they represent. However, the scholarships they enjoy should suffice. Far too few collegiate athletes can reasonably count on a pro career--and those who can always face the prospect of significant injury shortening or ending their career--so the education they receive needs to be their primary concern, and, it should go without saying, what the colleges exist to provide.

Having argued for graduation rate inclusion for college participation, I can appreciate the unfairness against current athletes who suffer for the the inadequacies of former ones, so I'd recommend a transitional period, a "grandfathering in," if you will. But colleges known as basketball or football factories, despite abysmal academic achievement of their student-athletes, need to become relics of the past. Time to finally place proper emphasis on what we say really counts in our educational institutions--education.

Richard Palzer of IL 6:28PM March 14, 2010

Athletes making obscene amounts of money for schools should be paid a respectable salary. Schools act as managers (in loco greedus) for professional moneymaking athletes, but don't pay anything. Disgusting. Reminds me of a professional boxer I know who is clueless about how much money he makes because his managers just pay all his expenses but don't let him in on revenues.

Linda Re of LA 11:44AM March 12, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement