Soon, the teams will be chosen and the brackets will be filled out for the office pool, all part of the walk-up to the latest outbreak of March Madness that begins Tuesday. It's all fun and games from there. Or is it? The NCAA basketball championship is great for fans, schools, and sponsors—and Las Vegas—but some ask whether it is good for student athletes, with graduation rates dismal at many colleges. They call for underperforming or academically indifferent schools to be excluded from postseason play. Others say players understand the deal and suggest that the NCAA should give up the "amateur" pretense and earn its millions honestly.
What do you think? Should graduation rates determine NCAA tournament eligibility? Take our poll and weigh in below. And don't miss the debate between Ben Miller of Education Sector and Marc Isenberg, author of Money Players, in this week's issue of U.S. News Weekly.
Previously: Are National Education Standards a Smart Idea?




Reader Comments Read all comments (2)
Richard Palzer of IL 6:28PM March 14, 2010
Linda Re of LA 11:44AM March 12, 2010