Climategate Emails, Snow Give Global-Warming Skeptics Ammo—Are They Right?

March 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print

For years, scientists have warned that human-generated greenhouse gases were behind global warming and have predicted catastrophic consequences. Still, coming off record-setting snowstorms along the eastern seaboard, many have scoffed, especially since so-called climategate E-mails suggested some data may have been manipulated. Sen. James Inhofe, and Oklahoma Republican, is among the skeptics. He argues that the science is flawed—that there is no clear consensus to warrant expensive antiwarming measures. Inhofe's family even built an igloo after a blizzard in Washington to mock the doomsayers. Joseph Romm, a physicist and climate expert at the Center for American Progress, counters that the scandal and the snowstorms change nothing. He cites the warmest January across the globe in the satellite record. And, he notes, we actually get more snow in warmer years.

What do you think? Did climategate expose global-warming fears as overblown? Take our poll and post your thoughts below. And don't forget to check out the debate between Inhofe and Romm in the April issue of U.S. News & World Report.

Are Global-Warming Fears Overblown?

View Results

Previously: Should 9/11 Terror Suspects Be Tried in a Military Court?

Tags:
global warming,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Not Suggestion,bottle process before use south current link address measure suggestion obvious conversation fix check safety fee upon bring health display male chairman selection simply pub himself chief size touch united circle about effect body comparison thin something raise consider through clear choice tomorrow sight tonight large working category offence up open interest substantial acid plan town credit beside acquire treatment pain welcome surface teach financial data party freedom society male effective door leading objective display hide think latter key cross claim road because down lead forward correct derive where communication

buy hcg weight loss cure guide of 7:42PM June 17, 2010

The only CERTAINTY is that the scientific community is uncertain about the cause(s) of climate change and to what degree human activity has on it.

Do I recycle? Yes, absolutely! Do I make a conscious effort to turn out lights, turn off TV before going to bed, etc? Yep. Do I think the earth's climate is so fragile that we will all die in 50 years? NO. Climate change has been occurring since LONG before the days of man and the internal-combustion engine.

I wonder what Al Gore proposes we should do about the Iceland volcano that is spewing MILLIONS of pounds of toxic ash into the atmosphere....is that man-made too, Al? How about all the volcanic activity along the ocean floor?

And by the way, stop telling our grade-school kids that polar bears are drowning because we humans drive our SUV's too much....that is just plain CRAP. Spare us the hot air, Al, it pollutes the environment!

Dave in TX of TX 10:10AM May 19, 2010

While Climate Change adds to the potential urgency of the global climate scenario, that Humankind's ability to influence it is perhaps somewhat debatable does not alter the long-term direction domestic and global energy policies must follow.

Strong evidence supports at least moderate-case scenarios of the global detriments to climate change through drought, famine, flooding, and economic loss. The likelihood of global climatic change requires the enactment of progressive, practical policies to mitigate damage that is already forecast to occur (not so unlike carrying home, auto, and life insurance in the event of catastrophe).

Climate change notwithstanding, we are still faced with depletion of non-renewable sources of energy (oil, coal, natural gas). Developing economies will be increasing their energy consumption as their standard of living rises; more than half the world is classified as “developing”. As such, huge increases in energy consumption are forecast to occur, the question being what resources will make up the mix.

Fossil fuels are inherently dirty, from mining, drilling, processing, and final emission at the point of energy production. Particulates, mercury, sulfur-, nitrous oxides, sludge, and associated waste streams are concomitant products, especially so with coal and oil. The health of the land, water, air, wildlife, and humans, are all adversely affected through release of these substances into the environment.

While we will continue to use fossil resources for energy, we must transition to the use of renewable technologies that include solar, wind, tidal, and appropriately managed biofuel resources. One should keep in mind that the cheapest, most readily form of energy available is that which is not used. Estimates of energy waste in the United States are in the 40-60% range! Demand-side (user) energy management through high-efficiency energy-consuming devices in the home, business, and industry are paramount to achieving the goal of reducing per-capita and aggregate energy consumption. Pertinent to consider is the distinction between per-capita energy consumption; for while per-capita consumption may decrease through gains in efficiency, an ever-increasing population (global and within the U.S.) will increase total energy use. Population stabilization is tantamount to successfully addressing the disparity between what this planet can provide, and what we consume.

Rhett of ID 7:27PM May 04, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement