Meet the Real Barack Obama

Sasha Abramsky discusses Inside Obama's Brain

December 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print

With almost daily television appearances and endless analysis of his every move, Americans—and those around the world­—think they know Barack Obama well. Yet according to Sasha Abramsky's latest book, Inside Obama's Brain, the president is too complex to be pigeonholed. Based on interviews with people who have known Obama throughout his career—friends, neighbors, colleagues—Abramsky paints a private portrait of the public icon, one that highlights just how multifaceted the man can be. Abramsky, a freelance journalist, is the author of four other books, including Breadline USA, about malnutrition in the United States, and is a senior fellow at Demos, a New York-based public policy think tank. He recently chatted with U.S. News about Obama, the pragmatic idealist, and his rope-a-dope approach to change. Excerpts:

What will readers discover in your book?

They'll discover that Obama is an extremely complex, multilayered personality. They'll discover that this is a man who is a very, very gifted writer. He's a very intelligent thinker. He has a very big-picture understanding of politics and policy and the ways in which they play out not just on the domestic stage but on the historical stage. When Obama approaches problems, usually he's thinking historically in a way that some presidents in the past have done, but not terribly many. They'll also discover that he's a very, very self-confident person.

What will surprise people most about the president?

There's an image of Obama as a pure idealist that was fairly carefully crafted in the election campaign, and it gelled very nicely with the rhetoric of change and hope and so on. Yes, he's an idealist, but he's also intensely pragmatic. And it's that fusion of pragmatism and idealism that makes him an effective politician. Idealism without pragmatism could degenerate into just a series of high-flown, oratorical feats. But it's Obama's ability to then knuckle down and do the hard work and actually push for specific policy reforms. There was a lot of mettle underneath the idealism.

Is your book just another Obama biography?

It's not a conventional biography. I didn't talk to Barack Obama himself. But I did talk to anybody and everybody I could who knew Obama. I was looking for people who knew him in a very private setting. People who had known him at school, at university, people who had known him as a community organizer, as a writer, as a lawyer. And so, I basically built up many layers of this man's personality through the write-around technique, through interviewing as many people as I could about as many different aspects of his life or aspects of his personality as I could.

Was anything missing from not talking to him?

In the end, I don't think anything was. Partly because I got such good access to so many people who knew him very, very closely and partly because Obama has written and talked so much about not just his life but his views on so many different issues over the years.

Has Obama as president behaved in a way you would expect from your book?

Yeah. What I found is that this is a man who knows how and when to compromise. In some ways, he's quite like Muhammad Ali. He lets himself lean backwards. He lets himself look like he's going onto the ropes, and then, very effortlessly, he counterattacks. And I think it's not an accident that Muhammad Ali is actually one of his heroes. When you go into Obama's office, in many of his workplace environments over the years, he's had a picture of Muhammad Ali on his wall. One of the things that surprised some of his core group of supporters, his base of supporters, especially in the left-wing blogosphere, has been the fact that it's not very easy to pigeonhole him. He's very radical in his aspirations, but he's very pragmatic in terms of his approach to how do I get where I want to get.

How are we seeing Obama the community organizer now?

He's extremely good at bringing disempowered people into a conversation and making them feel that their voices matter and that if they get involved in the process, then they can change the process. What we're seeing in the White House is that there are limits to the ways in which you can use community organizing skills in government. He's done a fairly good job of making government more open and more transparent. He's done a fairly good job of taking advice from many different corners—all of which are skills he picked up as a community organizer. And yet, at the end of the day, he's in charge of the most complex governing apparatus on Earth. And he's going to be making decisions, some of which are very hard to understand on the ground, based on information that isn't available to the public. That is a transition that we're seeing, this gradual move from the campaign Obama to the leadership Obama, and I think it's two slightly different sides of his personality in play.

How are they different?

Obama fuses a soaring idealism, an idealism which among many of his supporters sometimes bordered on utopianism, on the one hand, with a deep pragmatism on the other. His heart and his soul are somewhat utopian, but his brain is intensely policy wonkish. What we saw in the campaign is that the heart and soul were given greater play. That soaring rhetoric, once it assumes power, has to be mediated by actual results. And that makes maybe for a more effective form of governance, but it's less immediately powerful. It's less viscerally powerful to the base. So what we're seeing is that the Obama administration is becoming a very skilled operator of the political process, but in doing so, it's losing some of that allure of being the ultimate outsider candidacy and the ultimate outsider administration.

How has the presidency weighed on him?

He doesn't look to be quite the youthful persona he was even a year ago. On the other hand, when you talk to people and you ask them, "How is Obama in the White House?" they'll say, well, he's utterly unpretentious, that the assumption of power hasn't phased him.

 

Tags:
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You're correct - the total pop #s include everyone. In the end... its still only 20% of the USA. The President is still the President of people under 18 as well as people too lazy/incompentent to register.

Regarding no President in US history has ever won majority of popular vote.. I havent heard recent past Presidents using the excuse for what they do as "the majority voted us in... thus, this is what they want".

I am not sure the general public actually understands this. Most people arent registered to vote and then, within the group registered, 45-55% actually vote.

Lets just stay away from using the line.. the Majority voted for Obama and thus, we should do it.

Brian of GA 10:12AM July 01, 2010

The figure you cite would include the following groups:

1) People under the age of 18 (ineligible to vote)

2) People not registered to vote

Therefore, the fact that the majority of registered voters who voted constitutes a majority. Otherwise, by your own definition, no President in US history has ever won a majority of the popular vote...

ACME of CA 4:05PM June 29, 2010

Let me help you... Pres Obama was NOT elected by the majority (only by "registered" voters). He was received 63.25M votes. The population of the USA is between 307 and 309M. By my count, that is 20.4%. Hardly the "majority". I dont understand why so many people say this is what the people want.

Brian of GA 3:13PM June 29, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

May Unemployment Rate Dooms Barack Obama

With unemployment now at 8.2 percent, Mitt Romney is poised to gain ground with voters.

Planned Parenthood Pulls a Komen on Mitt Romney

Planned Parenthood successfully targeted the Susan G. Komen Foundation and is now getting political by campaigning against Mitt Romney.

Bill Clinton Undercuts Barack Obama in Wisconsin

Former President Bill Clinton is campaigning for Democrats across the country, disregarding Obama's campaign strategies.

Barack Obama Doesn’t Get a Pass on Poland Gaffe

The president's error and half-hearted apology is a serious diplomatic mistake.

Mitt Romney's Ridiculous Unemployment Reaction

Romney's dramatic reaction to the May jobs report makes him look false and calculating.

What John Edwards Tells Us About the Legal Profession

The legal profession is experiencing a very serious breakdown of ethics.

What the GOP Should Do if Obamacare Falls

If Obamacare is struck down by the Supreme Court, the Democrats are responsible for proposing another plan.

Barack Obama and George Bush Show Congress How to Act Like Adults

Obama and Bush are capable of acting like adults. Why isn't Congress?

advertisement