FCC 'Net Neutrality' Rules Would Keep the Web Free for Speech and Trade

Internet providers can and will cheat on service unless the government acts

November 24, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Network neutrality is not just good for the economy but also essential for democratic self-expression. Musicians and other artists have used the Internet to transform traditional distribution models; record companies no longer have a stranglehold on distribution. Political organizations and social action groups now organize on Facebook and Twitter and have decentralized and democratized fundraising on the Internet. Artistic, social, and political speech is generally afforded the highest degree of protection under the First Amendment, but we now

face the prospect of private censorship from Internet service providers. Network neutrality will preclude interference with protected speech and thereby fulfill the Founding Fathers' intention that there be a vibrant marketplace of ideas so that educated citizens can make wise decisions at the ballot box.

It is important to stress that network neutrality protects only lawful content. Internet service providers will always be able to enforce prohibitions on pirated material and unlawful obscenity. Emergency services for first responders can also be given priority. Network neutrality also gives service providers adequate flexibility for intelligent and reasonable management of their network systems.

In short, network neutrality is about your freedom to use the full potential of the Internet for commercial, political, artistic, and social expression. We need it, and that is why the FCC needs to act on its proposal. Not to do so would be an unfortunate action.

Read why FCC rules are a bad idea, by Barbara Esbin of the Progress and Freedom Foundation.

Tags:
FCC,
net neutrality

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mr. Schwartzman's 2nd paragraph is just a lie.

The FCC (and the FTC for that matter)already has authority to prevent the kinds of threats Mr. Schwartzman tried to scare us about. In fact, the FCC has already acted effectively in two such cases. There is simply no evidence that new rules are necessary, or that the companies have any incentive to behave in the way Mr. Schwartzman paranoidly assumes that they will. None at all.

Tom Giovanetti of TX 4:34PM December 04, 2009

In 2007, during a webcast of a Lollapalooza concert, Pearl Jam singer Eddie Vedder changed the lyrics to the tune "Daughter." He sang, "George Bush, Leave this world alone." Vedder sang those lyrics, but the webcast audience was not allowed to hear them: AT&T cut the audio while those words were sung. AT&T, caught with their hand in the corporate cookie jar, claimed it was all just a mistake.

In her US News post, Espin claims "There's no evidence that service providers are cheating, so why act now?" Point of fact, reports of net neutrality violations abound. Some, like the Pearl Jam story, are easy to understand. Others, like Verizon ignoring adopted DNS protocol to drive more traffic to their website or Comcast disrupting BitTorrent traffic are more arcane, but just as important in the larger scheme of things.

Are we to have an internet which openly allows free speech and expression? Or are we to have one controlled by corporate interests which will freely allow us to hear pro-corporate positions, but can censor a growing anti-corporate sentiment? Yesterday, don't criticize George Bush. Today, don't criticize Timothy Geitner. Tomorrow, don't criticize AT&T (don't ever criticize AT&T.)

Beware those waving the corporate flag. We've heard talk radio before.

Sue Wilson of CA 4:38PM November 28, 2009

Get the facts on Net Neutrality- stop big telco from turning the internet into TV:

http://www.savetheinternet.com/faq

Erik Larson of VA 8:14PM November 27, 2009

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

advertisement