A key aspect of the healthcare reform debate is whether to have an individual mandate legally requiring that each citizen carry health insurance. Critics call it an industry boondoggle, but advocates say it is morally and fiscally necessary. Is such a mandate needed?
Edited by Robert Schlesinger

Yes
By William H. Frist
Heart surgeon, Tennessee Republican, and former U.S. Senate majority leader
I believe in limited government and individual responsibility, cherish the freedom to choose, and generally oppose individual mandates—except where markets fail, individuals suffer, and society pays a hefty price. Let's face it, in a country as productive and advanced as ours, every American deserves affordable access to healthcare delivered at the right time. And they don't have it today....
No
By Dick Armey
Texas Republican, former U.S. House majority leader, and chairman of FreedomWorks
Two hundred billion dollars in new insurance premiums per year. And $463,000,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies over the next 10 years. That's how much health insurance companies could reap if any of the major healthcare bills become law. That's because they all include an "individual mandate"—a requirement that every American purchase health insurance or be fined—a policy that candidate Barack Obama opposed but that President Barack Obama supports....
What do you think?![]()




Reader Comments Read all comments (7)
Hotel in Muenster buchen of 6:39PM April 02, 2010
Merry of MT 3:51PM October 17, 2009
Enlightened Barbarian of OH 12:50AM October 13, 2009