'Death Panel' Lunacy Takes Dying With Dignity Off the Table

Reader Comments

Back to article

We are observing the end of the USA just like Camelot. There isn't much time left before our government delivers the final coup.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY 3:30PM December 29, 2009

The elderly are getting emotional because Obama is undercutting Medicare by 300 billion and undercutting Social Security by not increasing the COLA (supposed to be tied to inflation of energy costs; but everything else doesn't count like food, medicine,healthcare, transportation, etc. which is inflating like mad and affects Seniors on a daily basis).

Now we have some PHD's saying that Americans are not logical by not supporting Obama; that Americans shouldn't worry that all the illegals are going to be covered by the new healthcare system that Obama is trying to shove down our throats. That Obama is taking from the elderly, the weak and the poor, and giving it to the other poor who don't have healthcare.

OBAMA WANTS TO TAKE OUR TAX MONEY, MEDICARE MONEY, SOCIAL SECURITY MONEY AND GIVE IT TO THE POOR ILLEGALS. ISN'T THAT NICE OF HIM?

THE REAL AMERICANS CAN'T GET HEALTHCARE BECAUSE THE ILLEGALS ARE SUCKING IT UP FOR FREE. THE AMERICAN POOR SHOULD HAVE HEALTHCARE. THE ILLEGALS (MEXICAN FOR THE MOST PART) SNEAKED OVER THE BORDER TO GIVE BIRTH SO THEY COULD STAY IN OUR COUNTRY. HOWEVER, THEIR CHILDREN ARE STILL CITIZENS OF MEXICO AND THEY AND THEIR PARENTS SHOULD BE SENT BACK OVER THE BORDER. THE "SMART-ASS" MEXICAN GOV'T WON'T ALLOW THEM BACK INTO MEXICO. THERE ARE MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS LIVING, WORKING, AND USING OUR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOR F R E E.

BETTER BEEF UP OUR BORDER AND SHIP THE ILLEGALS BACK INTO MEXICO. WHAT IS MEXICO GOING TO DO? START A WAR WITH US?

AFTER KICKING THE ILLEGALS OUT OF THE COUNTRY, WE SHOULD RECALL OBAMA AS PRESIDENT AND PUT BIDEN IN AS PRESIDENT WITH THE STIPULATION THAT HE MAKES SURE THE ILLEGALS ARE OUT OF THE COUNTRY.

WAR IS ECONOMIC AND BASED ON THAT PREMISE, WE ARE AT WAR WITH MEXICO OVER THEIR SNEAKY ILLEGALS AND THEIR GOVERNMENT WHO SUPPORTS THEM SNEAKING OVER THE BORDER. WE DON'T HAVE TO BE FRIENDS WITH MEXICO; MEXICO HAS TO BE FRIENDS WITH THE UNITED STATES. WE SHOULD SUPPORT THE MONROE DOCTRINE, IN CASE CHINA OR RUSSIA OR SOME OTHER COUNTRY WANTS TO TAKE OVER MEXICO BECAUSE IT BORDERS THE UNITED STATES.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY 4:50PM September 02, 2009

The truly thoughtful commentators on both sides of this debate realize that Americans are not letting Y'obama, Pelosi, Reid and their crew, railroad yet another bill through Congress without some real debate.

How can any sincere person vote for a bill nobody has read and nobody understands? Y'obama got into bed with Big Pharma and Big Torte Lawyers, guaranteeing their cut of the pie. This is health reform?

Y'obama's formula for holding down health costs is to hold down reimbursements. That's really intelligent!

We see how government acts once it gets its foot in the door. Instead of reform, we get more and more rules to favor one side or another. This bill will start a process that Y'obama will use to implement single-payer insurance. That is something we don't need.

JimmyDaGeek of MD 10:00AM August 25, 2009

Death, death death. Trust me. It's not going to be the worst thing that happens to you. How can you live life to the fullest when you can't stop thinking about dying?

On the conclusion to this article...I may be an arrogant vainglorious ass-clown, but I have bad qualities too.

Andrew Baum of WI 3:44AM August 23, 2009

If there are so many Americans in an uproar over Health Reform or Universal coverage, then I propose changes that will help Providers stay solvent so they can continue to treat those that are able to pay.

Insurances have implemented a high co-pay to act as a deterrent to consumers that use the ER, for inpatient stays there are high patient liabilities (co-ins) multiple stays can or treatments can cause financial ruin, which is why we need reform. Now the old have Medicare and the poor have Medicaid, but the working class has the aforementioned…high liabilities. Excuse me even the elderly need secondary coverage to cover coinsurance and deductibles.

I propose, as an alternative to Health Reform. Providers be allowed to deny service to any patient that has an open balance at any hospital in order to protect against insolvency for the benefit of the community. Like any other purchase, payment history& ability to pay should be considered/. Furthermore, providers should have the right to sue consumers that are delinquent. If the American people don’t want health reform, then we all should bear the burden responsibly.

The reality is that without any type of reform, the average Provider related treatment, will exceed the actual tax. I am hard pressed to see how this bill is a partisan issue.

As far as “death panels” and waiting periods, you already have that. People with limited coverage ARE excluded from all possible treatments, pre-certification is required. Anyone in the field already knows that you can’t hide behind word games. I’ve written this before and I’ll I write it again. If the Republican party is about limited government, then we can’t have the type of government we need for a NATION STATE. The only thing they need to be in charge of, as presently constituted is Block Captain. When is the last time they addressed an issue, other than suggest medical coverage via the stock market…or to just say NO. Clearly they don’t comprehend that this is more than just a game. The truth is that something responsible must be done and mentally they are ill-equipped to participate. They have their own set of issues to deal with, they can’t possibly deal with mine or yours. At the rate their going, they’ll actually be complaining on talk shows that it’s President Obama’s fault they aren’t in power and someone needs to do something about it!!!! That’s how ridiculous they’ve become.

Anyone that thinks Healthcare reform isn’t need go take your one insurance and spend the night in a hospital to see what happens.

OHARVEY of PA 9:26PM August 22, 2009

Is it not an irony that our freedom to die at the time and in the manner we wish--including with assistance--has been abridged when, at the same time, guns are permitted freely, thus threatening each and every one of us with death by shooting at any time. NRA-supported gun rights are an accident, or an intention, just waiting to happen since too many cannot be trusted to pack firearms of choice without homicidal intent.

And it is discussion of and counseling for end of life that we're supposed to fear instead?

Roin W. Smith of UT 6:00PM August 21, 2009

Totally agree with our having the clear choice on end of life issues. I think it is a total waste of money to have counseling - that's something a doctor should be able to do in the treatment process. Your comment "The flap over Section 1233 is an illustrative example of the way that Obama's foes are resisting healthcare reform—by picking little segments of a complicated bill and distorting (or concocting) their effects" is a distraction from legitimate questions about the sum total or body of the bill. Few members of Congress have even read it.

The question of illegals "not having access to health care in the US" is another red herring. The Democrats took out the Republican submission that everyone must have an I.D. as proof of citizenship, and states that if one member of the illegal household is a citizen (the anchor baby) then all members of the household/family are eligible. Pelosi stated unequivocably that we have the moral obligation to treat illegals. So the point is - there is massive distortion and BS on both sides. The sorry excuse we have for a WH spokesman has done very poorly in explaining this behemoth and the press, like Farrell, is lambasting any and all opposition to it. The bill is too complicated for the layman to understand, has no trained workforce who can implement it, and will be the gift that keeps on taxing in years to come. Unfortunately, given the ass-clownery currently running the country, there may be enough vainglorious fools present to pass it.

Galasso of SC 9:37PM August 20, 2009

Prior to having any discussions on living wills and dnr orders one should truly read "Understanding Your Living Will" What you need to know before a medical emergency. Published by Addicus Books. www.addicusbooks.com

It could just save your life!

Fred Mirarchi of PA 5:13PM August 20, 2009

Your commentary about the value of end-of-life discussions is most reasoned and helpful. My wife went through this with both parents in the past 3 years, and while it did not ease our sense of loss, it did ease the process.

I welcome the opportunity, though, to discuss the way in which you have used the general public's fear of colostomy to make your case. Another brick in the stigma wall, I fear.

Ostomies of all types, and other kinds of diversions, happen to people of all ages. And they happen to only about 1 in every 600 of us in an industrialized society. Yes, it's a little more frequent as we age - due to illnesses like cancer of the colon, bladder and ovaries - but we also have some wonderful early screening and intervention options for the most common one, colon cancer.

I understand you did not necessarily mean that each dying person will end up with all of the things you mentioned, but ask that you learn a bit more about the truth of what it is to live with an ostomy as I have done for the past 37 years, and recall that as you write future pieces. See www.uoaa.org .

Ken Aukett, UOAA President of NJ 11:43AM August 20, 2009

If the Feds really wished to sort out the "death" question they would simply require that a box be signed on each tax return, YES keep me alive on machines forever or NO if reasonable means cannot bring me back please let me go. Then each individual fill out the name of their healthcare advocate.

The hundreds of millions of dollars screwing up some healthcare facilities are brain dead people with no next of kin or health advocate who are being kept on machines at tax payer's expense "forever". Why the Feds think they have to pay doctors to talk to patients about this I have no idea. Do they pay doctors extra for organ donors?

LauraVW of CT 9:25AM August 20, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement