Howard Dean on Obama, Michael Steele, and the Path to Real Healthcare Reform

Reader Comments

Back to article

How can Government stay out of health care when they are already in health care and have been for about 45 years (if I got that wrong tell me)

I hear republicans who was against Medicare are now depending on it and now they are against the Government expanding the system to those the insurance companies do not want. and many cannot afford the greed of the insurance companies and many lost their credit because they could not keep up with the greed. and many who would work hard but have disabilities would love to work but could not get health care if they went back to work. I believe their is so many ways that we could save money if we had a public plan and people felt free to go back to work and took care of themselves so they did not get sick.

Next we need to get land near homes so people can grow their own food that they cannot normally afford.

but the republicans would be against that because we would not be held hostage to their system and we might get healthy in this nation.

Druglords (pharmaceutical companies) need for you to be dependant on them so they can get you to do what they need you to do. Drug pushers (doctors) need your buisness and know what to say to keep it

Don D Brock

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

Don D Brock of AZ 12:02AM August 17, 2009

Keep the government out of our business. The government has no business in making decisions about our personal healthcare. What the American people want and need is not more government.

History is replete with examples of how well government is at managing anything. If you like the response the government gave to Katrina, well, you will be more than satisfied at the complete mess they will make of healthcare.

A thousand pages in the proposed healthcare bill. You are trying to slip something by us, including the “public option”.

scott of TN 7:38PM August 11, 2009

Dean makes some excellent points. He makes especially good sense on the public option--a way of assuring REAL market competitiveness among insurers where there is virtually no competitiveness at present. Introducing an insurer whose overhead costs are a fraction of those among private insurers will definitely make life difficult for insurers whose budgets are topheavy with executive salaries, advertising expenses, and contributions to political campaigns and parties.

Then, too, portability of health coverage regardless of jobs loss or jobs changes will surely make life easier for everyone, as will introduction of non-deniability of coverage based upon pre-existing conditions.

And it almost goes without saying that wellness and fitness will cut costs, something not presently pushed hard enough as our obesity epidemic and lack of fitness, among youngsters particularly, adequately show. Those who complain violation of individual rights in any push for wellness and fitness can protect their rights by paying more when their health care turn comes--as it will if statistics are any indicator.

Most important: The quality of the health care offered under any universal plan should be high and equal for all. Those who want additional "Cadillac" features can buy them separately and pay a federal tax on what they buy--a way of adding revenue to the health care budget. Elective procedures deemed unessential except to the people wanting them should also be taxed.

Socialism? No. Common sense remediation of a system long in need of it. The claims of some, particularly on the political Right, that the system isn't broken are being proven false every day, the facts and figures now available in abundance. It's time for action and an end to all the lies.

Ron W. Smith of UT 4:53PM August 10, 2009

tropical web number 1998

ruddythao of LA 8:46AM August 10, 2009

ice impact million debate gases oceans announced

codeeappel of CO 4:34AM August 10, 2009

research net details security movit geological observed

darrynelli of GA 4:34AM August 10, 2009

primary due stratosphere intensity assessment

daviotcann of IL 11:05PM August 09, 2009

major non glacier stabilization roughly increase report

baylacke of KY 11:05PM August 09, 2009

functionality increased statement less less

manlymatts of DC 8:11AM August 09, 2009

non engine million output

aldricpatn of AZ 8:11AM August 09, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

In Marine Umbrella Incident, Republicans Still Deny Obama Is President

Umbrellagate is more proof that Obama's critics cannot acknowledge that he is, indeed, president.

Obama Isn't Nixon, but Needs More Friends in Washington

President Barack Obama needs to make more friends in Washington.

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

advertisement