Sen. Jim DeMint Explains His Fight Against Obama and Socialism

July 31, 2009 RSS Feed Print

South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint has emerged as one of President Obama's most visible critics, comparing the United States to "where Germany was before World War II" and saying that healthcare reform could be the president's "Waterloo" and could "break him." DeMint explains what he sees as the danger facing the United States in Saving Freedom: We Can Stop America's Slide Into Socialism. He recently spoke with U.S. News about the economy, free markets, and the role of government. Excerpts:

How do you define socialism?

Socialism is when the government owns or controls a large part of your economic system. And if you look at where America is today, with General Motors and Chrysler, AIG, the banks, our education system, a large part of our healthcare system, energy, transportation, there are not many areas of the American economy that are not overregulated or controlled by the federal government.

Hasn't the government controlled a large part of the economy since the early 20th century?

I'm not advocating no laws and regulations; they're essential to free enterprise. But once the government starts taking apart and actually managing business activity—what it's doing today—it moves from a free-enterprise concept to one that's more socialistic.

So socialism is when the government can change its role in the economy whenever it wants?

It is. And when laws become arbitrary. When laws become retroactive. When contracts are revoked or leases are taken back. Investors and business people can no longer count on contracts. If they buy stock in companies, political activity may dilute those shares or totally change a business. There are a lot of people sitting on the sidelines because we no longer have that predictable and knowable legal system.

So socialism is about trust?

When you've got 30 czars in the White House, czars that are determining compensation, for instance, that's no longer a rule-of-law system. It's an arbitrary system. And you get back to the rule of men. And that's something our founders said would not work. You can't have freedom exist when you have arbitrary laws.

You've been criticized for saying, "We're about where Germany was before World War II where they became a social democracy. You still had votes, but the votes were just power grabs like you see in Iran." Do you regret making that comparison?

America is going down that road that many countries have gone down that have been destroyed by the growth of government power that often ends up with debt, tyrants, dysfunctional government. We've seen this movie before.

Is your message that government should get out of the way?

Government should do what the Constitution says it should do. The Constitution is intended to limit government in what it can do. And it's pretty specific about defending our country, regulating interstate commerce, and a few other things. What we're doing today is way out of the bounds of the Constitution. The whole concept of property rights is being violated. When the government moves from working for the general welfare of the whole country to a lot of particular interests, it becomes dysfunctional. And no one could argue that's not the case today.

What does the financial crisis teach us?

I know how free markets work. And I know a local bank or mortgage company does not make a loan to someone who can't afford to pay it back if they can't sell that loan to the government. And that's what we created with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They were buying up loans that weren't any good. Investors are not going to buy [a security] unless it has good creditworthiness behind it. And that was the implied guarantee that came through the government.

So if the government had not been buying these securities, there wouldn't have been a market for them?

No, there would not. They were sold with the implied guarantee of our government all over the world. If it had not had that implied guarantee, there would have been a whole lot more scrutiny on what was the value of those securities.

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

academies part globe article

ardinemcph of IA 12:25AM February 27, 2010

It's obvious that anyone we elect is not going to do what we want them to do. We are going to keep progressing towards a state of complete government control, whether you vote on the right or the left. Bush took away many of our own rights solely for national security, when there were plenty of other viable, more sensible options on the table.

The fact that we're engaging in two wars and probably going to start a third, is just completely ridiculous. We are pissing off the rest of the world with our imperialistic foreign policy. We think democracy is the best thing out there, yet our own citizens are being ignored by whomever we elect into office.

We can't afford to cut taxes anymore. We need to get this deficit under control. This means withdrawing all our troops from the 98+ countries that they are stationed in, so we can spend less on national security and have a more secure homeland. We also need to end this ridiculous war on drugs, because having a black market for these drugs is what is financing terrorists in the first place. If we destroy the source of their massive profits (the black market of drugs), then we take away a lot of their power and influence in the world. Instead, we've been fighting a drug war for over forty years that we haven't gained any ground on, at all...

DeMint is not going to change policy. No one we elect is going to change policy. The constitution is merely a historical artifact as it stands today. Haven't you noticed that whomever runs for president always promises all these great things and changes, yet they never happen? In fact, the opposite almost always happens. Bush said he would protect us from terrorist attacks, and in his first term, we had the largest terrorist attack on American soil. Obama promised healthcare reform, and since the Republican and Democratic parties are like matter and antimatter, there will be no change. They always disagree with each other solely for the purpose of disagreeing and winning support from their party base. It's getting ridiculous.

Axe the DEA, the CIA, merge the National Guard with the NSA, destroy the black market of drugs that finance terrorists (since drug users will use drugs regardless of the law--and we have about 20+ million regular illicit drug users in our country). Doing all this would eliminate the national deficit, and we will no longer need to worry about national security threats, because we would have plenty of troops at home protecting our borders, and we would save billions of dollars a year by ending funding for a war that cannot be won (the war on drugs), and we wouldn't need to mettle in other countries affairs. That's why we are so widely hated around the world. We are viewed as the "policing country" on Earth when we have no just cause of doing so. Just eliminate the war on drugs and all of our seemingly large problems will be solved.

The end. Too bad it will never happen. In 100 years the U.S. won't exist, if we continue on the path we're on.

Brian Crouse of WA 7:51PM February 25, 2010

medium developed air sres retrieved lapse required

lynnetmars of IL 12:43PM November 19, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.

advertisement