Home > Opinion > Sotomayor Hearings Remind Us the Republicans Can Be Judicial Activists, Too

Sotomayor Hearings Remind Us the Republicans Can Be Judicial Activists, Too

Reader Comments
Back to article

44 people have been arrest for coruption inclue some mayor from the democrat party, the number could expected to rise for massive investigation include some rabi lobist from the jew comunity and i thought the jew and the black are from the same team which is most of the money that contribute to Obama presidential election campain come from the Jew, lol rotf i thought i put my nick up in here ObamaNeedSomeJuices so they hate me and bust a bunch of Jew Rabis that have connection to the lobis and they have connection to coruption polican this is a massive case some head in of some dirty politican from the Democrat gona roll after taken of ten of thousand in cash. This might be another great scandal in the Democrat history beside that Clinton charge?

AmenBeliveInAmericanIsHisGod of CA 3:28PM July 25, 2009

Let's look at the two examples of "conservative activism" you raised.
The Second Amendment - after and "informational phrase" regarding militias - clearly states that,"... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It doesn't say, "The right of members of the armed forces shall not be infringed." It says, "The Right of The People".
Now, I know you love the 1st Amendment (well, at least parts of it). Though I note that it begins with, "Congress shall make no law..". Now, shall we limit the 1st Amendment protections only to laws made by Congress and no others? See what I mean?
Pressing on, regarding Ricci. Justice Roberts essentially asked how one can discriminate in order to not discriminate? That pesky, "common sense - logic thing" gets in the way of even judges occasionally.
Of course, you bring up Roe v. Wade in comparison. I note that nowhere in the Constitution, or nearly 200 years of precedent, was it considered legal to kill humans in the womb. This barbarism was discovered under the light of progressive and evolving (devolving) cultural mores. It is judicially schizophrenic in that it defines human life on the basis of "want". If a woman wants her baby and it is killed it is legally murder - If the mother feels the baby is inconvenient and unwanted than the life in her womb becomes a "women's health issue".... As an intellectually honest man, and new father, I'm certain you see the tortured reasoning in this obviously illogical proposition.
Now Bobby, stand up straight, and don't let the blood pool on the left side of your head.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 2:20PM July 23, 2009

Both parties are corrupted by members who are unpatriotic Ban-Abortion Creationists. They disrespect females by insisting a male God created everything. Bible writers gave women the job of being "Step And Fetch It." But women and other female animals are the sole source of new creatures whose offspring are exploited for profit in many ways. The Creationist Senators want to nullify Roe v Wade and force even whores to complete conceptions that have the potential to become believers. Then they'll pay the huge TEN PER CENT LIFETIME TITHE. It's $160,000 if a person pays 40 years on a steady yearly income of $40,000. How many people adopt an unaborted conception and are never told it was conceived in a brothel, where the man went to ESCAPE FATHERHOOD? Pro-Life is harming public health by keeping in the gene pool the flawed DNA of paraphiliacs. Their flaws are described in texts on abnormal pathology, and it includes pedophilia, coprophilia, and wanting to have sex with corpses. Some rapes are committed by that kind of paraphiiac. Kill her and then violate her. Ban-Abortionists are disgustingly horrible in their ignoraaurace.

auradawnveirs of CA 10:34PM July 22, 2009