The Secret History of the National Security Agency

Intelligence historian Matthew Aid talks to U.S. News about his new book

June 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print

The National Security Agency is one of the most secretive fiefdoms inside the American government and is probably familiar to most people only as the guys who may or may not be listening to your phone calls and reading your E-mails as they surveil terrorists.

Intelligence historian Matthew Aid has spent the past quarter century prying loose NSA documents through the Freedom of Information Act and interviewing current and former agency employees. He recently chatted with U.S. News about his new book, The Secret Sentry: The Untold History of the National Security Agency. Excerpts:

What does the NSA do?

The NSA is the U.S. government's eavesdropping agency, with an annual budget of $8 billion. It spies on all foreign communications, and it also encodes U.S. government communications. About 75 percent of its budget is spent on vacuuming up outside communications, and about 25 percent goes to protecting U.S. government communications. The protection of U.S. communications has become more important as more and more hackers try to break into everything from the power grids to the Pentagon's E-mail network.

Does the NSA have offensive capabilities?

Since 9/11, the military has gone out and recruited a small but important group of technically minded people, very young people, who can break into our enemies' communications systems. They are now a group at NSA working what's called Tailored Access Operations.

Working with the CIA and others, TAO identifies computer systems and networks being used by foreign 
terrorists. Then, a small group of computer hackers belonging to the U.S. Navy, who call themselves Computer Network Exploitation operators, break into the systems electronically to steal the information contained on the hard drives, as well as monitor the E-mail traffic coming in and out of the computer.

Just listening?

When a military commander asks NSA to jam Taliban communications or bring down an Iraqi insurgent website, it drives the NSA people absolutely bonkers. They don't want to go around putting viruses on an al Qaeda laptop. In fact, they don't want to leave any evidence that they've been snooping at all. All the NSA wants to do is listen. There's a never-ending battle between the listeners and the disrupters in the wake of 9/11, and it won't be resolved anytime soon.

How important is NSA compared with, say, the CIA?

There's really no comparing them. The NSA has admitted that on 9/11, more than 60 percent of the material inside the President's Daily Brief [the highly classified national security report] came
from signals intelligence. That percent age is undoubtedly higher today. Human intelligence by nature isn't that comprehensive or reliable. 

Yet there have been some staggering blunders because of signals intercepts. During the Gulf of Tonkin [incident in August 1964], the NSA intercepted signals showing that the North Vietnamese had attacked a U.S. destroyer. It concluded that they were live reports from a battle. They reported that information
up the chain of command. Only many, many years later did the NSA go back and listen to the original material. What they found was that they had intercepted Vietnamese radio operators giving a post
mortem of a battle which occurred two days earlier. It was one of the greatest intelligence mistakes in history.

OK, now let's hear about a success.

In [October] 1964, China was about to detonate their first atomic bomb. The U.S. was well prepared because the NSA was intercepting communications from Chinese transport planes flying VIPs to
the site. They were also intercepting weather forecasts around the test site. Then Secretary of State Dean Rusk strode into the pressroom and told the reporters that he had intelligence that China was 48 hours away from detonating a bomb. The NSA went crazy. The Chinese immediately shut down all their radio traffic, and all the sources were lost. Because of that and other incidents, the NSA still refuses to provide anyone with the raw transcripts of the intercepted communications. It's been a bone of contention be
tween CIA and NSA for more than 50 years—especially with al Qaeda phone call transcripts before 9/11.

Tags:
NSA

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

One of the burdens of your work is that mistakes often get exposed, but successes have to stay uner wraps. I hope that this book brings a bit of public appreciation of the secretive work that you folks (along with the helpers in the Navy, Army and Air Force)have done.

The relationship between sigint (signal intelligence) and humint (human intelligence) is complementary, not competitive, so carry on and keep us safe.

Jim Osburn of IL 11:15PM June 28, 2009

The interview appears to reveal nothing not previously reported by Bamford. The comment " . . . they [NSA] don't want to leave any evidence that they've been snooping at all. All the NSA wants to do is listen. There's a never-ending battle between the listeners and the disrupters in the wake of 9/11. . . ." is interesting, but perhaps it should not be.

In effect, what's new, Mr. Kingsford?

Eisenbahn Wilhelm of MT 11:51PM June 24, 2009

When ever a strong statement is made, and with all knowing certainty, the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. Quote: "Until 1978, not a single high-level Russian code was broken". Really? Frankly, the code that was intercepted in Maryland by NSAA Green Beret cryptologist (1967) would certainly fall into the "high-level" code arena. The code in question, pertained to the displeasure Breshnev felt towards the dispatching of Che to Bolivia, by Castro. (CIA has claimed credit for this code break, but I would beg to differ). The breaking of this code directly led to the transfer of two specially trained Green Beret A teams to Bolivia from Panama, to work directly with the Bolivian Army in the capture of Che Guevra. Secondly,July 2, 1967 a newly minted SR-71 veered into Mexican air space. Mexico promptly contacted Moscow,thinking it was a russian aircraft. Russia responded in code and the NSAA listened in and decoded. Again, this event would certainly fit into the high-level arena.

(NSAA, National Security Agency-Army)

Matthew of CA 2:28AM June 23, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement