Employee Free Choice Act Means Union Intimidation in Plain English

June 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

Undoubtedly this frustrates union bosses and their political allies. There's no question that demographic changes coupled with the new global marketplace and a decline in domestic manufacturing has delivered a blow to union membership. But that should not give unions—or Congress—the right to eliminate a basic democratic institution and open the door for the intimidation of workers caught up in a union campaign.

The name "Employee Free Choice Act" may sound appealing, but it's time the public looks beyond the packaging and sees what this bill is all about.

Sabrina L. Schaeffer is a visiting fellow with the Independent Women's Forum and the managing partner of Evolving Strategies.

Tags:
unions

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Union intimidation and violence is well documented throughout history. To suggest that requiring an individual to publicly announce his vote by signature or any other means would not target that individual is naive. The people that support the EFCA are the unions wanting to see who they need to convince to see things their way. And if you don't believe there is violence in the Unions, tell me where is Jimmy Hoffa

Dexter of TX 9:05AM September 04, 2011

The opponents of the EFCA do not diminish the importance of an individual's signature as IZAAK VELEZ of CA suggests. They actually desire to protect the sanctity of that signature. For IZAAK VELEZ of CA to suggest that no one can force a person to sign his name is naive. Union and employer intimidation is well documented throughout history. The only way to protect the free choice of workers is to have a system which does not allow either side to see the individual's vote.

Dexter of TX 8:59AM September 04, 2011

If 74 percent of the country holds a favorable view of unions, how is it that only 9 percent of nonunion workers would like to join a union, and what stops them? I would like to see a poll showing how many union workers would like to be non union but can't because the law requires them to join.

Dexter of TX 8:52AM September 04, 2011

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

advertisement