How Should Obama Respond to North Korea's Nuclear Test?

May 27, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Reports the Daily News: "North Korea launched tests Tuesday of two short-range missiles, a day after its firing a nuclear bomb underground in a saber-rattling test of the Obama administration." Here's how the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. responded: "If you want to continue to test and provoke the international community, they're going to find they'll pay a price because the international community is clear: it's not acceptable." How should Obama respond to North Korea's test? What role does China have in North Korea's saber-rattling? Post your thoughts.

 

Previously: Is Sotomayor the Right Pick?

Take our poll: Should the U.S. hold China accountable for North Korea's saber-rattling?

Tags:
Obama administration,
North Korea,
nuclear weapons,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

AndroidBoy420, it's a good thing you don't work for the State Department.

While your arguments to manufacture more here have merit, and I agree - your views on China are short-sighted and your bravado is dangerous.

Disengagement from China would be unwise, and nearly impossible. We owe them a LOT of money. Trade keeps the peace. There are sticking points, to be sure - Taiwan, North and South Korea, and Japan. But through most of our history with China, we've had cordial relations, with periods and events of strain.

Your television probably wasn't made there, especially if it is a flat screen. They're usually made in South Korea. Pretty much every flat screen, regardless of the brand. GM may move there, get mad about that.

Free markets have radically changed China for the better in a very short period of time - and they know it. They are cautious by nature, so they don't rush into things. That cautious nature is one reason they are the oldest surviving major culture on earth - show a little respect.

Yes, we have our differences with China. They spy on us, as we do on them. They have a very different view of human rights, and are suspicious of our motives. And rightly so. We tend to be hypocrites when it comes to human rights. Our treatment of Chinese immigrants in the late 1800's reminds me of what we're trying to do to Mexicans today - make them scapegoats for our problems. Where is our moral fiber now?

Consider that China is almost as large as the US in landmass, has over 4 times the population, and a military budget that is a fraction of our own.

Moral fiber has nothing to do with the relationship. It rarely does in geopolitics. It's about practicality and necessity. Inject moral judgements so you can feel superior for the short-term, and you lose the long-term benefits of the relationship.

Comparing China with the Soviet Union is ridiculous. They are not the same, and never have been. China and the Soviets were NOT allies, despite both being communist. In fact, they really, really, really didn't like each other.

Rich of CO 7:04PM May 29, 2009

SURROUND THAT TINY NATION WITH AS MANY PATRIOT MISSILE SYSTEMS DEEMED NECESSARY...AND WAIT FOR THE NEXT MOVE...IF THEY START SOMETHING,POUND THEM LIKE DESSERT STORM ,WITH EVERYTHING WE HAVE THAT IS NON NUCLEAR. DONT WAIT ON THE WORLD FOR PERMISSION...FOR IT WILL THEN BE TO LATE

BOUNTYHUNTER of NY 10:26AM May 28, 2009

"I will consider an attack...any attack...by the Republic of North Korea on ANYBODY as an attack by China upon the United States." There you go. Say what you want about the Kennedys, but that man was ready to throw down.

It's time to disengage from China. I will pay twice as much for a TV if it's made here. They are an evil regime and I think time has shown that free markets aren't going to change the country.

Where will Wal-Mart get their inventories in 10 years? I'm betting transportation costs are going to rise by then. Better to proactively move the means of production back here in by book.

They sell organs culled from political prisoners. They steal our military secrets. They have no freedom of speech. They censor media and the internet. They rewrite history. They imprison and execute religious people. THEY BACK NORTH KOREA!!! When are we going to get our moral fiber back? No, not gay marriage moral fiber, the real kind. The kind of moral fiber that makes you choose between what is expedient and what is right.

Or I can put it like this...would the Soviet Union have collaped if we dealt with them like we have with the Chinese? (Man, when I put it that way, it sounds really dumb to deal with them at all.)

AndroidBoy420 of WI 3:16PM May 27, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement