T. Boone Pickens: Break Our Foreign Oil Addiction With Natural Gas

May 26, 2009 RSS Feed Print

"America is at a crossroads" sounds like tired campaign rhetoric, but when it comes to energy policy, we are in the middle of the intersection.

Since July 8, 2008, when I launched the Pickens Plan to reduce our escalating dependence on foreign oil, I have talked about that dependence as the greatest threat to our economy and our national security. Our consumption is out of whack—25 percent of the world's oil production with only 4.5 percent of the world's population and just 3 percent of the world's oil reserves. We have to get off foreign oil, and the only way is with domestic fuels.

Some argue that we should take a free market approach to energy, that government should be hands off. That's ridiculous at many levels, but I always ask, do you think OPEC is a free market? I am not suggesting we "pick winners" among resources. I'm for anything American.

For example, as much as we might be in favor of generating 20 to 30 percent of our electric power from wind and solar, you can't run an 18-wheeler on a battery. We need to look for ways to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. All too often, we fail to understand the magnitude of the problem. Even as recently as April 2009, we imported 375 million barrels of petroleum—over two thirds of all the oil we used. Put aside the economic drain of sending nearly $500 billion overseas last year for oil. You're still left with the continuing environmental burden associated with gasoline and diesel as transportation fuels. The fact is, we have put ourselves in a position of having countries from unstable regions, with governments that may be unfriendly to the United States, in control of our energy future.

In short, our national security is severely at risk. With so much of our oil coming from foreign sources, even a relatively small disruption in supply can have an exaggerated effect on prices. We have the resource to change the equation in our favor—natural gas. It's a window of opportunity that we can't afford to miss. We have enough natural gas reserves in the continental United States to last for more than 100 years. Over the past 10 years, new technology has been developed so that the vast supplies of natural gas are now easily and safely recoverable from the huge shale deposits under Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Appalachia, Arkansas, and elsewhere.

But we are in the classic "chicken and egg" situation: Manufacturers don't want to build natural gas vehicles because they aren't certain there will be a market for them. Consumers (companies and individuals) can't buy such vehicles because the manufacturers won't build them.

Nearly 10 million natural gas-powered vehicles are on the world's streets and highways, but fewer than 150,000 are in the United States. This is an insupportable situation. There is no reason why, with the dangers of relying so heavily on imported oil as clear and present as they are and with the enormous supply of a replacement fuel that is available right now, we are not making better use of our resources.

There is a bill currently in Congress, H.R. 1835, which is known as the NAT GAS Act of 2009. While Capitol Hill is bitterly divided along partisan lines, H.R. 1835 has already generated support from 50 cosponsors, roughly divided between Republicans and Democrats. That alone should generate front-page headlines.

We should immediately begin providing incentives to truckers and fleet owners, to transit companies and school boards, to municipal, county, and state vehicles, for the purpose of kick-starting a natural gas vehicle industry in the United States. The NAT GAS Act will do that.

The United States government purchases about 65,000 civilian vehicles each year. Of those, in 2007, only 129 were powered by natural gas. Committing the federal government to purchase about half of its vehicles with the ability to run on natural gas will jump-start the manufacture of an entirely new class of vehicles. State and local governments will follow suit because these vehicles are much more cost-efficient over their life cycles.

School districts will change from diesel buses to school buses running on natural gas so children won't start and end their day inhaling diesel fumes. Municipal bus systems are already making the switch from diesel to natural gas for all of these reasons. One example is the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority, the largest bus fleet in the United States, with 2,500 natural gas buses. In natural gas we have a resource that is abundant, domestic, cleaner, and cheaper than imported gasoline or diesel fuel.

America is at a crossroads, and the only good road to the future is domestic natural gas.

Tags:
T. Boone Pickens,
natural gas,
energy,
energy policy and climate change,
renewable energy,
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The two comments above show the conundrum we are in. Poster number one says: If enough people want NGVs then the market will support them with infrastructure. Poster number two says: I won't buy an NGV because there's no place to refuel.

The answer is: Let's lead with heavy trucks - 18-wheelers - which generally run the same routes back and forth on a regular schedule. An over-the-road trucker generally eats, sleeps, and refuels in the same places on every trip. One national trucking firm suggested they can get from coast-to-coast with 10 refueling stops. Private industry will, in fact, fill that gap; but the government can jump start the process by providing incentives for trucking companies to replace aging vehicles which burn dirty, imported diesel; with new vehicles running on clean, domestic natural gas.

No dichotomy; no conundrum.

Rich Galen of VA 9:17AM June 01, 2009

The reason one does not want the gov't controlling the price is that we are/were a free market economy. Price must cover costs and a profit. If the gov't does not cover it's costs, it will have to pass the difference on to YOU in the form of higher taxes, it's not complicated. THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH !! no matter what Hugo, or Fidel, or Stalin, or Lenin/Lennon, or Obama tell you in their books.

If there is a demand for natural gas, people will fill the demand by selling CNG. If you want it so bad get a Phill station installed at home and be done w/ it. OR, better yet, you invest YOUR dollars in a filling station, put your butt on the line. If the market likes your idea, you will be rewarded, if not, you'll have to figure out a way to pay back the money...

GOOD LUCK

PV of MI 9:33AM May 28, 2009

I would buy a Natural gas car today except I can't fill it up anywhere. The Government taxes gas which increases our cost. Why can't the Government open up their own Nat Gas stations cut out the middle man and keep Nat gas prices at a reasonable price.

Bret L. Hedges of NY 1:55PM May 26, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement